ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 September 2018, 05:10 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Patek 5980AR
Posts: 28
|
Ap 15202or
I am thinking of trading my 5164 stainless for the Ap 15202OR... Thoughts on 15202OR?
Is it too flashy being rose or does the matte finish dull it out? I have been thinking about doing it for a while. I had a 15202 stainless and sold it for a huge premium. Other than being rose is it heavier... thoughts on differences? |
13 September 2018, 05:22 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
hmm, if u had the 64R I'd say no.
but given it's SS... tough. i think I'd go 202OR and no, the rose is not flashy. and it'll feel amazing on the wrist...imo, far greater than the 64 in SS. |
13 September 2018, 05:28 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
|
I'd rather sell the AR if you have it, keep the 64.
|
13 September 2018, 09:43 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: Australia
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, JLC
Posts: 612
|
That’s a tough one for sure. The OR is substantial on the wrist. Is it too flashy? Not under a cuff. I would do it. Let’s face it, how many 15202 gold Royal Oaks do you see out there?
__________________
Have...a good..time...all the time. That's my philosphy! |
18 September 2018, 08:55 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 50
|
i have the 15202OR, it has a specialness to it. I also have a 15202ST, it doesn't seem to pop the same way - if that one bored you a bit, the OR has pop. but not in a tacky ROO Brick way.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.