ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 01:27 AM

Good Day All,

I have narrowed down my search for a new Paneria a bit; I am going to get a 44mm Luminor.

I already have this one; PAM 114

One of these 5

1. PAM 233 (a lot of cash but one nice watch).

2. PAM 177 0r 176 (Love the TI)

3. PAM 111 or 112 (I think a good sandwich dial would go with my 114 well)

4. PAM 024 or 025 (I do like the subs a lot).

5. PAM 088 (GMT would be nice).
(no photos of this one).

Thanks,

Eric

nauticajoe · 1 May 2012, 01:31 AM

My vote goes to either the 233 or 112.

Good luck!

wokafu · 1 May 2012, 01:40 AM

112 tq

dalip · 1 May 2012, 01:40 AM

233. No doubt.

psv · 1 May 2012, 01:51 AM

Well, do you really "need" one, Eric? :-)

Out of those, I'd go with the 233 or find an older Ti with painted dial.

Noonan · 1 May 2012, 01:53 AM

The 233 is the clear choice if you're willing/able to afford one. Otherwise, I'd go with the trusty 112.

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

Well, do you really "need" one, Eric? :-)

Out of those, I'd go with the 233 or find an older Ti with painted dial.

Need for sure, that is what I told my wife.

BKKJake · 1 May 2012, 02:55 AM

Another vote for 233!

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalip

233. No doubt.

I really want the 233 but it is going to cut in the AP fund

dddrees · 1 May 2012, 03:21 AM

Eric, I think you ought to take the Pam money and combine it with the AP money and get yourself a Patek.

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

Eric, I think you ought to take the Pam money and combine it with the AP money and get yourself a Patek.

I think I will need a lot more money to get the Patek

I talked with my AD and no sales on Patek

MortgageGuy · 1 May 2012, 03:51 AM

Out of what you have listed I would grab a 111, really have been wanting one of these myself again too

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MortgageGuy

Out of what you have listed I would grab a 111, really have been wanting one of these myself again too

I am really thinking about a 112 or 176.

ghotihead2001 · 1 May 2012, 04:23 AM

I can vouch for the awesomeness of the 176

Hoppyjr · 1 May 2012, 04:28 AM

I'd go off the chart and say 114 & 312 (or 351 if you want Ti). The 312/351 is closer to the 24/25 in price - much less than 233 - and gives you the 1950 case and a different look.

sent using Tapatalk

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoppyjr

I'd go off the chart and say 114 & 312 (or 351 if you want Ti). The 312/351 is closer to the 24/25 in price - much less than 233 - and gives you the 1950 case and a different look.

sent using Tapatalk

I had a 351 before and I am not sure I would get a Panerai in house auto again. Love the look but it died on me in less then 2 weeks.

FNFZ4 · 1 May 2012, 06:40 AM

since you already have a 114... I guess my suggestion will be a 111 or 177... unless you want a date.

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FNFZ4

since you already have a 114... I guess my suggestion will be a 111 or 177... unless you want a date.

I am thinking about the 177.

It would go well with the straps I have.

SaddleSC · 1 May 2012, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric23

I am thinking about the 177.

It would go well with the straps I have.

I agree! If you already have a 114 in SS, then the 177 in Ti would make a great companion. I LOVE my 177 because it is so lightweight (108 grams with Micah strap). It looks great with most straps and the brushed finish looks great.

rulessapt · 1 May 2012, 08:54 AM

#177 is an awesome piece. Sandwich dial and lightweight. The Ti finish is prone to marking if you're like me, don't wear a suit and work with your hands.
Having said that not the ideal environment for most watches, but I do like them with patina!

I suppose ou could save on straps and not buy a Radiomir ;-)

cheers
richard

watchdaddy1 · 1 May 2012, 09:24 AM

177 OR 176 Ti is soo nice

kilyung · 1 May 2012, 09:24 AM

233. Have you tried a 305?

Psmith · 1 May 2012, 09:30 AM

From your list, the 233

eric23 · 1 May 2012, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

233. Have you tried a 305?

Hi Mike, yes tried the 305 but the 47mm does not work for me, just a bit too big.

B. Doggy · 1 May 2012, 11:14 AM

From your choices, I'd go 112.

mfer · 1 May 2012, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B. Doggy

From your choices, I'd go 112.

x2

not from your choices in the luminor range....
372/390/000.

tomato · 1 May 2012, 12:07 PM

Would you consider letting your 114 go to fund a 233 so it doesn't eat into your AP fund as much?

Incorrigible · 1 May 2012, 11:31 PM

233

Gmtsub · 1 May 2012, 11:51 PM

Sub Pam all the way go 24 or 25

eric23 · 2 May 2012, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomato

Would you consider letting your 114 go to fund a 233 so it doesn't eat into your AP fund as much?

Got to keep the 114, the wife got it for me.

1 May 2012, 01:40 AM	#4
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	233. No doubt. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

1 May 2012, 03:21 AM	#10
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,251	Eric, I think you ought to take the Pam money and combine it with the AP money and get yourself a Patek. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

1 May 2012, 03:51 AM	#12
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	Out of what you have listed I would grab a 111, really have been wanting one of these myself again too __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

1 May 2012, 09:30 AM	#23
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	From your list, the 233 __________________

1 May 2012, 11:14 AM	#25
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	From your choices, I'd go 112. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

1 May 2012, 01:27 AM	#1
eric23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Calgary Posts: 9,595	Need a new PAM Good Day All, I have narrowed down my search for a new Paneria a bit; I am going to get a 44mm Luminor. I already have this one; PAM 114 One of these 5 1. PAM 233 (a lot of cash but one nice watch). 2. PAM 177 0r 176 (Love the TI) 3. PAM 111 or 112 (I think a good sandwich dial would go with my 114 well) 4. PAM 024 or 025 (I do like the subs a lot). 5. PAM 088 (GMT would be nice). (no photos of this one). Thanks, Eric

1 May 2012, 01:31 AM	#2
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	My vote goes to either the 233 or 112. Good luck!

1 May 2012, 01:40 AM	#3
wokafu "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Malaysia Watch: SM300+14060M Posts: 2,012	112 tq

1 May 2012, 01:51 AM	#5
psv "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: North America Posts: 11,062	Well, do you really "need" one, Eric? :-) Out of those, I'd go with the 233 or find an older Ti with painted dial.

1 May 2012, 01:53 AM	#6
Noonan Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: US Watch: 3570.50 Posts: 2,156	The 233 is the clear choice if you're willing/able to afford one. Otherwise, I'd go with the trusty 112.

1 May 2012, 02:55 AM	#8
BKKJake "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Bangkok Posts: 48	Another vote for 233!

1 May 2012, 04:23 AM	#14
ghotihead2001 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: NYC Watch: Breaking bad Posts: 426	I can vouch for the awesomeness of the 176

1 May 2012, 04:28 AM	#15
Hoppyjr "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Washington State Posts: 441	I'd go off the chart and say 114 & 312 (or 351 if you want Ti). The 312/351 is closer to the 24/25 in price - much less than 233 - and gives you the 1950 case and a different look. sent using Tapatalk

1 May 2012, 06:40 AM	#17
FNFZ4 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Alfred Location: DC Metro Watch: None Posts: 29,368	since you already have a 114... I guess my suggestion will be a 111 or 177... unless you want a date. __________________ NEED PC HELP? ASK HERE! Watches: Patek 5205G \| Patek 5167A \| 16613 Serti \| 116718 Green \| 216570 Black \| 16700 Pepsi Wish list: Patek 5726/1 \| AP RG Ceramic \| Patek 5712 \| Patek 5130

1 May 2012, 08:54 AM	#20
rulessapt "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: richard Location: Tasmania Watch: u c Posts: 514	#177 is an awesome piece. Sandwich dial and lightweight. The Ti finish is prone to marking if you're like me, don't wear a suit and work with your hands. Having said that not the ideal environment for most watches, but I do like them with patina! I suppose ou could save on straps and not buy a Radiomir ;-) cheers richard

1 May 2012, 09:24 AM	#21
watchdaddy1 Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: William Location: Az Watch: strap whore Posts: 1,194	177 OR 176 Ti is soo nice

1 May 2012, 09:24 AM	#22
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,870	233. Have you tried a 305?

1 May 2012, 12:07 PM	#27
tomato "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Frank Location: Canada Watch: PAM & AP Posts: 368	Would you consider letting your 114 go to fund a 233 so it doesn't eat into your AP fund as much?

1 May 2012, 11:31 PM	#28
Incorrigible "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: J. Knapmeyer Location: Huntington Beach Watch: 116520 & PAM 321 Posts: 226	233

1 May 2012, 11:51 PM	#29
Gmtsub Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 111	Sub Pam all the way go 24 or 25

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)