ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 April 2018, 01:39 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,104
|
Interesting. Good work
|
9 April 2018, 09:48 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas tx
Watch: 16610,1675,16030
Posts: 1,135
|
Glad to see you confirmed a theory I be had for a while!
Does it feel any different in practice? Or is it not worth the trouble? |
9 April 2018, 10:22 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: DRSD
Posts: 511
|
|
9 April 2018, 10:23 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,821
|
I wouldn’t trust this. Although if I’m not diving I suppose not much could go wrong if the parts fit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
9 April 2018, 10:41 PM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: "H"
Location: England
Watch: ing Rainclouds
Posts: 1,437
|
Quote:
|
|
10 April 2018, 12:48 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
[QUOTE=Juggernaut;8460835]it DID work!
Here are some photos: So here's my 14060M Sub with the standard Sub caseback: Hi OP. Any chance that you can re-create this pic but with the replacement case back fitted. I would like to see the numbers. thanks Johny.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
10 April 2018, 01:25 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 760
|
|
14 April 2018, 11:00 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
[QUOTE=Johny;8469360]
Quote:
I can't believe I forgot the money shot! Thanks |
|
31 May 2018, 10:47 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
I've been getting asked repeatedly where I sourced the 16710 caseback. I found mine on eBay from a German seller. It took several weeks to arrive to me here in the states.
|
22 September 2019, 09:45 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: California
Posts: 38
|
Does anyone know if an explorer II 16550 caseback would fit the same way? I'm looking to do this same kind of mod to my 14060M and I'm curious what other "low profile" casebacks would fit, such as a 1675/16750 or a 16550/16570.
|
25 April 2020, 05:24 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 19
|
I would like to know if this would work with sub-c and gmt-c. I have the same idea. love the sub case, but much prefer the low profile of the gmt back. Don't care about losing water resistance.
|
25 March 2021, 01:32 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: California
Posts: 38
|
After contemplating this mod for 2 years, I finally did it too. Acquired a brand new 2180 caseback and had my local watchmaker swap it and do the 100M pressure test. They are definitely interchangeable and use the same gasket. He confirmed the inside dimensions are the same. While it only makes a 0.7mm difference in thickness, you can totally see and feel the difference. Watch sits much flatter on the wrist, basically the difference between a 5-digit Sub and a YM, GMT, or EXII in how it sits, but with the added advantage of the low profile 14060 bezel. Yes, the bracelet now needs to be tightened by about a half-link worth. This mod definitely achieves new levels of insane WIS minutia but the heart wants what the heart wants!
|
25 March 2021, 03:06 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 318
|
2180 case back is from what model Rolex ? OP used a GMT case back which has the reference number inside the case back.
|
25 March 2021, 03:26 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: LA<>NY
Watch: Rolex♠Lange
Posts: 2,277
|
|
25 March 2021, 03:39 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: California
Posts: 38
|
Rolex transitioned case backs to general part # sometime in the 2000s (not exactly sure the year, but I know it was no later than 2009). So the 16570, 16700, 16710, and 16713 engraved case backs, which were otherwise identical, all became 2180, while the 14060, 16610, and 16613 all transitioned to a 2160 case back. So, depending on the year of the watch you might see a 4-digit case back or the older style with the watch ref engraved on it. Any service replacements would have the 4-digit case back.
|
25 March 2021, 04:40 PM | #46 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 60
|
Great job, I hope it fits.
|
25 March 2021, 10:11 PM | #47 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Very good work. Thank you for the information.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.