The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 September 2018, 12:18 PM   #1
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
126710 spring bar comparison

Had a little time today and was hoping to post some pics of the jubilee from the BLRO (#69200) on some other models (Daytona, Submariner, and BLNR). However I discovered the pins on this model are different from others. Specifically, the ends of the BLRO pins that insert to the case are thicker. Further, the BLRO pins are thinner along the middle, than say the pins from a Daytona or super jubilee (1.8mm).

Here are all three pins:
1. BLRO / bracelet 69200
2. Daytona / bracelet 78590
3. Submariner / bracelet 97200



Thickness of the ends of the pins vary with pin 1 for the BLRO being the fatter of the three:



I have seen info posted the oyster with polished center links (#78590) will fit the BLRO which I don’t doubt. But Rolex did switch up the pins making the jubilee not universal using OEM pins. I am sure with the right aftermarket pins it could work on other sports models.

A few more pics for fun....
BLRO on top
Daytona 116500 bottom



BLRO - 69200


The tape job...


No scratches...


Done playing with bracelets for the night...


Anyway- just wanted to share info on the pins. I apologize if this is old news. ⌚️


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 12:43 PM   #2
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
126710 spring bar comparison

Additional note:
The BLRO jubilee with the factory pins do not work with the Daytona (116500) because their ends are too fat. They click into place but do not lock in... with a little pressure pop out of the case.

The other two sets of pins (pictured and labeled 2 & 3) won’t fit the BLRO jubilee because their middle width is too wide to fit into the bracelet. Hopefully this makes sense-


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 12:54 PM   #3
toxicavenger
"TRF" Member
 
toxicavenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
If I am not mistaken the tips on the #3 the Sub should be 1.2mm in size. So what size is the BLRO? 2mm maybe? Which is crazy to say the least.
toxicavenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 12:59 PM   #4
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,523
Thanks for the info
It would make more sense for Rolex to make All spring bara the same size to make life a little easy on us!!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 01:03 PM   #5
exador
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
Thanks, first time I've seen the lug holes on one of these.

So it seems that the 126710 takes 1.6 mm(?) spring bars with 1.5 mm(?) pins.

Thus those that have installed an Oyster using the standard 1.8 mm spring bars with 1.2 mm pins would have a sloppy fit.
exador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 01:32 PM   #6
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by exador View Post
Thanks, first time I've seen the lug holes on one of these.

So it seems that the 126710 takes 1.6 mm(?) spring bars with 1.5 mm(?) pins.

Thus those that have installed an Oyster using the standard 1.8 mm spring bars with 1.2 mm pins would have a sloppy fit.

I don’t know the measurement and don’t have something at the cabin to measure pins this small.

I think you are right, the oyster with the 1.8s must be a sloppy fit due to the holes in the case being a larger diameter than the pins.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 01:33 PM   #7
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorA View Post
Thanks for the info
It would make more sense for Rolex to make All spring bara the same size to make life a little easy on us!!


They know what they’re doing to us.... And it isn’t making life easier.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 01:35 PM   #8
WS9D
"TRF" Member
 
WS9D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,368
Very interesting. Thanks for the comparison.
WS9D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 02:11 PM   #9
Porsche
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: John
Location: ɹǝpun
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,984
wow, many thanks. Detailed discussions on spring bars are few and far between, so this is an excellent resource...
__________________
Obey Gravity, it's the Law!

ROLEX --- SEIKO --- HEUER

TRF REHAUT
T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M
Porsche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 02:26 PM   #10
toxicavenger
"TRF" Member
 
toxicavenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porsche View Post
wow, many thanks. Detailed discussions on spring bars are few and far between, so this is an excellent resource...
You are right and they are super important. It would be cool if the op could get some measurements also.
toxicavenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 02:42 PM   #11
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by toxicavenger View Post
You are right and they are super important. It would be cool if the op could get some measurements also.


If a forum member knows or can chime with the spring bar measurements, please do. If not, tomorrow I can get some measurements and I’ll post them here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 03:16 PM   #12
imgook
"TRF" Member
 
imgook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Rob
Location: Australia
Watch: 116500LN White
Posts: 886
Thanks for sharing. Pictures say 1000 words.
imgook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 06:59 PM   #13
zack777es
"TRF" Member
 
zack777es's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Malaysia
Watch: Rolex AP PP Tudor
Posts: 409
OP, thanks for taking the time to put this up.
Great info.
__________________
My Instagram Feed
zack777es is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 07:26 PM   #14
Enoch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 294
I discovered the difference in pins and lug holes this week..

Had to use generic 20mm pins to do this

Enoch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 10:40 PM   #15
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
Neat comparison, thanks for sharing
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 10:45 PM   #16
incontrol
"TRF" Member
 
incontrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
Interesting that Rolex would spend so much time engineering different size spring bars just to mess with us switching bracelets. Seems childish!
__________________
Patek Philippe
Rolex
incontrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 11:07 PM   #17
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
thanks for taking the time to post this!

Mix matching spring bars has always been part of the game if you like to tinker with bracelets (like I do).

For example, the 63600 jubilee has it's own spring bars that basically follow the bracelet. The Sub Glidelock bracelet will fit my 116710 but will require the spring bars from a YM (neither the original sub spring bars or GMT spring bars will work with that combo).
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 12:08 AM   #18
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
126710 spring bar comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
The Sub Glidelock bracelet will fit my 116710 but will require the spring bars from a YM (neither the original sub spring bars or GMT spring bars will work with that combo).

That’s odd, I had no issue with standard 2.0mm spring bars for my BLNR with the 97200 glidelock (pictured).



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 12:10 AM   #19
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNIC View Post
That’s odd, I had no issue with standard 2.0mm spring bars for my BLNR with the 97200 glidelock (pictured).



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I couldn’t get mine to seat with anything but the 1.8mm spring bars. Specifically from a YM. The BLNR and Sub spring bars both wouldn’t seat for me.

Have you been wearing it around like that? No issues. Just double check to make sure they’re clicked in all the way.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 12:14 AM   #20
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
I couldn’t get mine to seat with anything but the 1.8mm spring bars. Specifically from a YM. The BLNR and Sub spring bars both wouldn’t seat for me.



Have you been wearing it around like that? No issues. Just double check to make sure they’re clicked in all the way.


Yes, spring bar 3 pictured and have worn it like this approximately a year. I’ve also used the same spring bar for my 16610LV and another 97200 glidelock with no issues.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 12:16 AM   #21
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch View Post
I discovered the difference in pins and lug holes this week..



Had to use generic 20mm pins to do this




Looks beautiful. I have a random assortment of aftermarket spring bars but after “tinkering” with them, it’s obvious they are not created equally. I would be a little nervous with their fit and durability but that’s my aftermarket version, yours may be nicer.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 01:57 AM   #22
R!$
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
I try to keep everything original but nice collection
R!$ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 02:43 AM   #23
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNIC View Post
Yes, spring bar 3 pictured and have worn it like this approximately a year. I’ve also used the same spring bar for my 16610LV and another 97200 glidelock with no issues.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Check your ceramic Sub lug holes. They should be the larger size and not the same as a 16610, and use spring bars with the larger pivots.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 02:45 AM   #24
toolr
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northwest
Posts: 1,339
Very interesting, thanks!
toolr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 03:03 AM   #25
mikkoi
"TRF" Member
 
mikkoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Real Name: Mikko
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,437
Great! Thanks for share this. Very useful!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
mikkoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 03:06 AM   #26
gt0279a
"TRF" Member
 
gt0279a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Georgia
Watch: All of them
Posts: 569
SD43 also has those new style spring bars, thinner with larger pivots.
__________________
Current:
Rolex Daytona 116500 | Rolex Submariner 116610 | Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69
Past:
Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 | Rolex Submariner 16610 | Rolex Submariner 1680
gt0279a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 05:09 AM   #27
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
That's some solid information. Very useful in helping to find a solution in the future if one wants to tinker.
Thanks for posting.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 06:23 AM   #28
pvl86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 90
Many thanks. I have both the BLRO and the BLNR. What spring bars would be needed for the jubilee work on the BLNR?

Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk
pvl86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 08:09 AM   #29
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by toxicavenger View Post
You are right and they are super important. It would be cool if the op could get some measurements also.


Spring Bars / Pin
1. 1.4mm / 1.1mm (BLRO - 69200)
2. 1.7mm / .80mm (Daytona - 78590)
3. 1.92mm / .80mm (Submariner - 97200)

I used a digital caliper and triple checked.

Re-inserting pics so you don’t have to scroll to the top.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2018, 08:27 AM   #30
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvl86 View Post
Many thanks. I have both the BLRO and the BLNR. What spring bars would be needed for the jubilee work on the BLNR?

Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk

None of the spring bars pictured. As far as I can tell, you will need to get spring bars no more than 1.4mm diameter with .8mm pins/pivots for the jubilee/69200 to work with BLNR, Subc, and Daytona.

The size/shape of the jubilee/69200 seems to match up to the Daytona case really nice and I’m guessing it will be the same for mentioned models with the right spring bars.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.