ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 September 2018, 12:18 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
126710 spring bar comparison
Had a little time today and was hoping to post some pics of the jubilee from the BLRO (#69200) on some other models (Daytona, Submariner, and BLNR). However I discovered the pins on this model are different from others. Specifically, the ends of the BLRO pins that insert to the case are thicker. Further, the BLRO pins are thinner along the middle, than say the pins from a Daytona or super jubilee (1.8mm).
Here are all three pins: 1. BLRO / bracelet 69200 2. Daytona / bracelet 78590 3. Submariner / bracelet 97200 Thickness of the ends of the pins vary with pin 1 for the BLRO being the fatter of the three: I have seen info posted the oyster with polished center links (#78590) will fit the BLRO which I don’t doubt. But Rolex did switch up the pins making the jubilee not universal using OEM pins. I am sure with the right aftermarket pins it could work on other sports models. A few more pics for fun.... BLRO on top Daytona 116500 bottom BLRO - 69200 The tape job... No scratches... Done playing with bracelets for the night... Anyway- just wanted to share info on the pins. I apologize if this is old news. ⌚️ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 September 2018, 12:43 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
126710 spring bar comparison
Additional note:
The BLRO jubilee with the factory pins do not work with the Daytona (116500) because their ends are too fat. They click into place but do not lock in... with a little pressure pop out of the case. The other two sets of pins (pictured and labeled 2 & 3) won’t fit the BLRO jubilee because their middle width is too wide to fit into the bracelet. Hopefully this makes sense- Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 September 2018, 12:54 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
If I am not mistaken the tips on the #3 the Sub should be 1.2mm in size. So what size is the BLRO? 2mm maybe? Which is crazy to say the least.
|
27 September 2018, 12:59 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,523
|
Thanks for the info
It would make more sense for Rolex to make All spring bara the same size to make life a little easy on us!!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
27 September 2018, 01:03 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
Thanks, first time I've seen the lug holes on one of these.
So it seems that the 126710 takes 1.6 mm(?) spring bars with 1.5 mm(?) pins. Thus those that have installed an Oyster using the standard 1.8 mm spring bars with 1.2 mm pins would have a sloppy fit. |
27 September 2018, 01:32 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
I don’t know the measurement and don’t have something at the cabin to measure pins this small. I think you are right, the oyster with the 1.8s must be a sloppy fit due to the holes in the case being a larger diameter than the pins. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
27 September 2018, 01:33 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
|
27 September 2018, 01:35 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,368
|
Very interesting. Thanks for the comparison.
|
27 September 2018, 02:11 PM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: John
Location: ɹǝpun
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,984
|
wow, many thanks. Detailed discussions on spring bars are few and far between, so this is an excellent resource...
__________________
Obey Gravity, it's the Law! ROLEX --- SEIKO --- HEUER TRF REHAUT T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M |
27 September 2018, 02:26 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
|
27 September 2018, 02:42 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
If a forum member knows or can chime with the spring bar measurements, please do. If not, tomorrow I can get some measurements and I’ll post them here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
27 September 2018, 03:16 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Rob
Location: Australia
Watch: 116500LN White
Posts: 886
|
Thanks for sharing. Pictures say 1000 words.
|
27 September 2018, 06:59 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Malaysia
Watch: Rolex AP PP Tudor
Posts: 409
|
OP, thanks for taking the time to put this up.
Great info.
__________________
My Instagram Feed |
27 September 2018, 07:26 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 294
|
|
27 September 2018, 10:40 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
|
Neat comparison, thanks for sharing
|
27 September 2018, 10:45 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
|
Interesting that Rolex would spend so much time engineering different size spring bars just to mess with us switching bracelets. Seems childish!
__________________
Patek Philippe Rolex |
27 September 2018, 11:07 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
|
thanks for taking the time to post this!
Mix matching spring bars has always been part of the game if you like to tinker with bracelets (like I do). For example, the 63600 jubilee has it's own spring bars that basically follow the bracelet. The Sub Glidelock bracelet will fit my 116710 but will require the spring bars from a YM (neither the original sub spring bars or GMT spring bars will work with that combo). |
28 September 2018, 12:08 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
126710 spring bar comparison
Quote:
That’s odd, I had no issue with standard 2.0mm spring bars for my BLNR with the 97200 glidelock (pictured). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
28 September 2018, 12:10 AM | #19 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
|
Quote:
Have you been wearing it around like that? No issues. Just double check to make sure they’re clicked in all the way. |
|
28 September 2018, 12:14 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Yes, spring bar 3 pictured and have worn it like this approximately a year. I’ve also used the same spring bar for my 16610LV and another 97200 glidelock with no issues. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
28 September 2018, 12:16 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Looks beautiful. I have a random assortment of aftermarket spring bars but after “tinkering” with them, it’s obvious they are not created equally. I would be a little nervous with their fit and durability but that’s my aftermarket version, yours may be nicer. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
28 September 2018, 01:57 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
I try to keep everything original but nice collection
|
28 September 2018, 02:43 AM | #23 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
Check your ceramic Sub lug holes. They should be the larger size and not the same as a 16610, and use spring bars with the larger pivots.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
28 September 2018, 02:45 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northwest
Posts: 1,339
|
Very interesting, thanks!
|
28 September 2018, 03:03 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Real Name: Mikko
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,437
|
Great! Thanks for share this. Very useful!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
28 September 2018, 03:06 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Georgia
Watch: All of them
Posts: 569
|
SD43 also has those new style spring bars, thinner with larger pivots.
__________________
Current:
Rolex Daytona 116500 | Rolex Submariner 116610 | Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69 Past: Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 | Rolex Submariner 16610 | Rolex Submariner 1680 |
28 September 2018, 05:09 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
That's some solid information. Very useful in helping to find a solution in the future if one wants to tinker.
Thanks for posting. |
28 September 2018, 06:23 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 90
|
Many thanks. I have both the BLRO and the BLNR. What spring bars would be needed for the jubilee work on the BLNR?
Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk |
28 September 2018, 08:09 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Spring Bars / Pin 1. 1.4mm / 1.1mm (BLRO - 69200) 2. 1.7mm / .80mm (Daytona - 78590) 3. 1.92mm / .80mm (Submariner - 97200) I used a digital caliper and triple checked. Re-inserting pics so you don’t have to scroll to the top. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
28 September 2018, 08:27 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
None of the spring bars pictured. As far as I can tell, you will need to get spring bars no more than 1.4mm diameter with .8mm pins/pivots for the jubilee/69200 to work with BLNR, Subc, and Daytona. The size/shape of the jubilee/69200 seems to match up to the Daytona case really nice and I’m guessing it will be the same for mentioned models with the right spring bars. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.