ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ajg223 · 29 November 2018, 04:59 AM

So I have cleaned out the collection of all my sport models. I am looking to add a Rolex back into the mix to add to my daily wearer (a nomos Orion neomatik). I am considering the following.

5 digit sub
17650 polar
214270 (lumed version)
114270/14270

I have owned a couple 6 digit references and they are just too beastly for my 6.75 inch wrist. As hard as I try to love them and as amazing as the bracelets are I just don't feel comfortable. I know there are people that have owned all of these at one point and wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mg Barcelona · 29 November 2018, 05:11 AM

a late 14060M would be my call. I hear you on the chunkiness of the 6 digits.

praveen · 29 November 2018, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

So I have cleaned out the collection of all my sport models. I am looking to add a Rolex back into the mix to add to my daily wearer (a nomos Orion neomatik). I am considering the following.

5 digit sub
17650 polar
214270 (lumed version)
114270/14270

I have owned a couple 6 digit references and they are just too beastly for my 6.75 inch wrist. As hard as I try to love them and as amazing as the bracelets are I just don't feel comfortable. I know there are people that have owned all of these at one point and wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have the same size wrist. Surprised to hear that the 39mm 214270 is beastly. Just to clarify, is it the weight, height or the case size the issue? I'm waiting on my first sport model so I would love to get your (and others) thoughts here.

The Libertine · 29 November 2018, 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mg Barcelona

a late 14060M would be my call. I hear you on the chunkiness of the 6 digits.

Agree. Can’t go wrong with the 14060M.

ajg223 · 29 November 2018, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by praveen

I have the same size wrist. Surprised to hear that the 39mm 214270 is beastly. Just to clarify, is it the weight, height or the case size the issue? I'm waiting on my first sport model so I would love to get your (and others) thoughts here.

I haven't tried the 6 digit explorer 1. I have owned the sub and gmt 6 digit and the weight is great. They are just too big in general for my tastes.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mgsooner · 29 November 2018, 06:31 AM

My wrist is between 6.75 and 7. I’ve got a 214270 and personally don’t find it too large at all. The versatility of it is damn near unmatched. I work out of our home so I’m typically in casual dress but I wore it with a suit yesterday and it killed.

ajg223 · 29 November 2018, 09:59 AM

The front runners are the 5 digit sub and the new explorer 1. The explorer 1 would win hands down but the maxi case scares me. Does it wear like the ceramic sub?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Saaci · 29 November 2018, 12:52 PM

I’ll support any opportunity to promote this watch!

And on my 7 inch wrist

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sensui · 29 November 2018, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mg Barcelona

a late 14060M would be my call. I hear you on the chunkiness of the 6 digits.

I like this idea.

AdamG · 29 November 2018, 01:11 PM

14060m

77T · 29 November 2018, 01:29 PM

Lighter, Stronger, Faster: 4-digit if you can afford it.

If not, a 5-digit 16570

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

AEC · 29 November 2018, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

So I have cleaned out the collection of all my sport models. I am looking to add a Rolex back into the mix to add to my daily wearer (a nomos Orion neomatik). I am considering the following.

5 digit sub
17650 polar
214270 (lumed version)
114270/14270

I have owned a couple 6 digit references and they are just too beastly for my 6.75 inch wrist. As hard as I try to love them and as amazing as the bracelets are I just don't feel comfortable. I know there are people that have owned all of these at one point and wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Try on a 39mm Explorer I. The case is shaped in a very svelte way, much different than the Submariner's case. Other things to love about it are the exquisite Oyster bracelet with Easylink, and the matte dial and Professional hands with Chromalight.

encarter13 · 30 November 2018, 12:51 AM

16570 or 14060M

ltmgeller · 30 November 2018, 01:10 AM

5 digit sub would be my vote happy hunting

ajg223 · 30 November 2018, 02:21 AM

Is there a reason people are suggesting the no date sub over the date version?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

datejust24 · 30 November 2018, 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

Is there a reason people are suggesting the no date sub over the date version?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I MUCH prefer the Submariner over the Submariner date...aesthetics and simplicity of the dial, sans date, does it for me...

OP consider the 14060M...2 or 4 liner...can’t go wrong either way

eltonbalch · 30 November 2018, 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

Is there a reason people are suggesting the no date sub over the date version?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I can’t speak for others but my first Rolex was a 14060 no date Sub. My AD had both and the price difference was not an issue. The no date Sub was just mesmerizing because it was so simple and flew a bit more under the radar without the cyclops.

capote · 30 November 2018, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by encarter13

16570 or 14060M

I agree

fania123 · 30 November 2018, 02:59 AM

5 digit sub

sugarl4nd · 30 November 2018, 03:03 AM

126710BLRO will fit 6.75" wrist like a dream, much better than BLNR or other 6 digits

HogwldFLTR · 30 November 2018, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by encarter13

16570 or 14060M

I'd go with either of these two as well. I like having a watch with a GMT function and I find the date is a great asset as well. If only one watch those functions would make the deal for me. On the other hand having the adjustable bezel can be really useful. I also like having a dive watch. IMHO the choice would come down to those two. I'd likely go for the 16570 because its complication, understated, fly under the radar presence, and favorable pricing. You'll pay a premium for a 14060 (M or not).

praveen · 30 November 2018, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

I haven't tried the 6 digit explorer 1. I have owned the sub and gmt 6 digit and the weight is great. They are just too big in general for my tastes.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Got it. Thanks!

ajg223 · 6 December 2018, 04:48 AM

Went with the 16570. Very pleased with the choice. Nothing special about this particular one, but love the look on a strap. Thanks for the opinions.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pauln · 6 December 2018, 05:41 AM

It sounds like you already have a business watch, so I’d skip the Explorer 1 and go directly to Explorer 2. Or the sub. I recently learned that I’m not as fond of divers as I thought I was. Imagining wearing one is a lot different than wearing one.

AEC · 6 December 2018, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

So I have cleaned out the collection of all my sport models. I am looking to add a Rolex back into the mix to add to my daily wearer (a nomos Orion neomatik). I am considering the following.

5 digit sub
17650 polar
214270 (lumed version)
114270/14270

I have owned a couple 6 digit references and they are just too beastly for my 6.75 inch wrist. As hard as I try to love them and as amazing as the bracelets are I just don't feel comfortable. I know there are people that have owned all of these at one point and wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think reference 214270 has a lot going for it: the svelte case and bracelet (including Easylink in the clasp) make for excellent comfort; it uses caliber 3132, featuring a Parachrome spring and Paraflex shock absorption; the matte dial and Chromalight on the markers look dynamite.

lenfried29 · 6 December 2018, 06:06 AM

I don't like nether of the watches on your list. I have 6.5 inch wrist and the beastlier watch is it's better for me.

MickCollins1916 · 6 December 2018, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

Went with the 16570. Very pleased with the choice. Nothing special about this particular one, but love the look on a strap. Thanks for the opinions.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice pickup! I was about to respond and suggest 14060m or 214270, both of which I have and enjoy, but that Explorer II is a great reference. Looking good on that strap.

Saaci · 6 December 2018, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajg223

Went with the 16570. Very pleased with the choice. Nothing special about this particular one, but love the look on a strap. Thanks for the opinions.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Always happy to have another join the 16570 club! Hope you’re loving it

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

el-heffe · 6 December 2018, 12:16 PM

Polar gets my vote. So many black dial watches. I find the white very refreshing.

ocN55 · 6 December 2018, 01:02 PM

16570 polar all the way. Stunning watch and very under the radar.

29 November 2018, 04:59 AM	#1
ajg223 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: NY Posts: 81	Opinions on which Rolex Sport Model So I have cleaned out the collection of all my sport models. I am looking to add a Rolex back into the mix to add to my daily wearer (a nomos Orion neomatik). I am considering the following. 5 digit sub 17650 polar 214270 (lumed version) 114270/14270 I have owned a couple 6 digit references and they are just too beastly for my 6.75 inch wrist. As hard as I try to love them and as amazing as the bracelets are I just don't feel comfortable. I know there are people that have owned all of these at one point and wanted to hear some opinions. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 November 2018, 01:29 PM	#11
77T 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 40,847	Lighter, Stronger, Faster: 4-digit if you can afford it. If not, a 5-digit 16570 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

30 November 2018, 12:51 AM	#13
encarter13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Real Name: Nick Location: Georgia Posts: 2,613	16570 or 14060M __________________ Instagram - watches_wine

30 November 2018, 01:10 AM	#14
ltmgeller 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: New York Watch: Rolex Posts: 21,461	5 digit sub would be my vote happy hunting __________________ Oh, look at the time... Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019

29 November 2018, 05:11 AM	#2
mg Barcelona Banned Join Date: Sep 2018 Location: Barcelona Posts: 298	a late 14060M would be my call. I hear you on the chunkiness of the 6 digits.

29 November 2018, 06:31 AM	#6
mgsooner "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Real Name: Matthew Location: Tulsa, OK, USA Posts: 1,909	My wrist is between 6.75 and 7. I’ve got a 214270 and personally don’t find it too large at all. The versatility of it is damn near unmatched. I work out of our home so I’m typically in casual dress but I wore it with a suit yesterday and it killed.

29 November 2018, 09:59 AM	#7
ajg223 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: NY Posts: 81	The front runners are the 5 digit sub and the new explorer 1. The explorer 1 would win hands down but the maxi case scares me. Does it wear like the ceramic sub? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 November 2018, 12:52 PM	#8
Saaci "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: New York Watch: 16570 Posts: 300	I’ll support any opportunity to promote this watch! And on my 7 inch wrist Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 November 2018, 01:11 PM	#10
AdamG "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Adam Location: HNL, LDN, SHA Watch: 5 digit ref Posts: 397	14060m

30 November 2018, 02:21 AM	#15
ajg223 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: NY Posts: 81	Is there a reason people are suggesting the no date sub over the date version? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 November 2018, 02:59 AM	#19
fania123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: PHILA Posts: 1,719	5 digit sub

30 November 2018, 03:03 AM	#20
sugarl4nd "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 67	126710BLRO will fit 6.75" wrist like a dream, much better than BLNR or other 6 digits

6 December 2018, 04:48 AM	#23
ajg223 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: NY Posts: 81	Went with the 16570. Very pleased with the choice. Nothing special about this particular one, but love the look on a strap. Thanks for the opinions. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 December 2018, 05:41 AM	#24
Pauln "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Paul Location: Colorado Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,543	It sounds like you already have a business watch, so I’d skip the Explorer 1 and go directly to Explorer 2. Or the sub. I recently learned that I’m not as fond of divers as I thought I was. Imagining wearing one is a lot different than wearing one.

6 December 2018, 06:06 AM	#26
lenfried29 Banned Join Date: Jun 2018 Location: Far Far Away Watch: tick-tock Posts: 1,206	I don't like nether of the watches on your list. I have 6.5 inch wrist and the beastlier watch is it's better for me.

6 December 2018, 12:16 PM	#29
el-heffe "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2018 Real Name: Ken Location: USA Posts: 241	Polar gets my vote. So many black dial watches. I find the white very refreshing.

6 December 2018, 01:02 PM	#30
ocN55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Location: WestCoast! Watch: Vintage Posts: 854	16570 polar all the way. Stunning watch and very under the radar.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)