The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 May 2020, 06:49 PM   #1
Dave4D
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: France
Posts: 116
1675/16750 Insert Check

Hello everyone,

I would like to pick the experts' opinion on a 1675/16750 blue back insert.

Does the fading look natural to you? Whats your general opinion on this one?



Dave4D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 12:48 AM   #2
Pocosso
"TRF" Member
 
Pocosso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Davide
Location: Italy
Watch: RO/ROO/PAM/DAYTONA
Posts: 402
Could you post some picture of the back?
__________________
5167-5711
6217-8001
16520A-16520E-16500-116610LV-166710LN-16760-16030-16570T-
ROO(Ti)-RO-ROC
PAN0055-PAM351-PAM733-PAM721
Type XX-XXI
Pocosso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 01:04 AM   #3
BigBlue1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
BigBlue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Webmaster
Location: Space
Watch: it pal !
Posts: 2,955
I agree with Dave. Photos of the back would help. 2 seems off to me, but I am no expert at the Pepsi. Please wait for others to chime in.
__________________
" Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford".
Cindy Crawford

Hypochondria is the only disease I haven't got
RIP Mikey
BigBlue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 01:15 AM   #4
Dave4D
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: France
Posts: 116
Thanks a lot already for chiming in.

Here is the back.

Dave4D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 02:26 AM   #5
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,215
Looks good to go. The fading in the red area appears natural.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 02:52 AM   #6
BigBlue1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
BigBlue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Webmaster
Location: Space
Watch: it pal !
Posts: 2,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave4D View Post
Thanks a lot already for chiming in.

Here is the back.

From the GMT Master Himself.

It’s Good.
__________________
" Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford".
Cindy Crawford

Hypochondria is the only disease I haven't got
RIP Mikey
BigBlue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 04:04 AM   #7
Dave4D
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: France
Posts: 116
I appreciate that, thanks a lot.
Dave4D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 06:47 AM   #8
BigBlue1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
BigBlue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Webmaster
Location: Space
Watch: it pal !
Posts: 2,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Looks good to go. The fading in the red area appears natural.
I think Ill refrain from advice if I'm on my crappy phone. The twos are perfect.
__________________
" Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford".
Cindy Crawford

Hypochondria is the only disease I haven't got
RIP Mikey
BigBlue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 05:19 PM   #9
Pocosso
"TRF" Member
 
Pocosso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Davide
Location: Italy
Watch: RO/ROO/PAM/DAYTONA
Posts: 402
The Fading looks good to me, the font is thin, but it may be a late insert and acceptable.
It looks in good condition for a 16750, if you are looking for one for a 1675 I would focus on a fatter font one.
__________________
5167-5711
6217-8001
16520A-16520E-16500-116610LV-166710LN-16760-16030-16570T-
ROO(Ti)-RO-ROC
PAN0055-PAM351-PAM733-PAM721
Type XX-XXI
Pocosso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2020, 11:55 PM   #10
Dave4D
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: France
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocosso View Post
The Fading looks good to me, the font is thin, but it may be a late insert and acceptable.
It looks in good condition for a 16750, if you are looking for one for a 1675 I would focus on a fatter font one.

It is indeed for a 1675, thanks for your input. It got me thinking..
Dave4D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2020, 07:18 AM   #11
Pocosso
"TRF" Member
 
Pocosso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Davide
Location: Italy
Watch: RO/ROO/PAM/DAYTONA
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave4D View Post
It is indeed for a 1675, thanks for your input. It got me thinking..
Absolutely, it is perfect for a 1675, what I meant was that the production era is probably late 70s/80s, same for the 16750.
But Yes, is is perfect for a 1675.
__________________
5167-5711
6217-8001
16520A-16520E-16500-116610LV-166710LN-16760-16030-16570T-
ROO(Ti)-RO-ROC
PAN0055-PAM351-PAM733-PAM721
Type XX-XXI
Pocosso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2020, 09:00 AM   #12
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocosso View Post
Absolutely, it is perfect for a 1675, what I meant was that the production era is probably late 70s/80s, same for the 16750.
But Yes, is is perfect for a 1675.
Hello Pocosso. The production era is 1980s - bluebacks were not in use until the 1980s. Based on my experience, bluebacks were in use sometime prior to 1984 -around 1981, 1982 or 1983 (choose the year since this is not an exact science) and thereafter up until today.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2020, 09:44 AM   #13
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 550
Love it, looks great!
__________________
phillip@ridleywatchmakers.com
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2020, 12:19 PM   #14
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave4D View Post
It is indeed for a 1675, thanks for your input. It got me thinking..
It’s definitely not for a 1675....a 16750 and service at that thin font
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.