ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

nyc2la · 6 July 2016, 07:44 AM

These two references have gotten some nice attention recently. If you were to pick one of the two in platinum, which would you choose?

Thanks in advance.

Pics borrowed from the interweb:

rolex_addict · 6 July 2016, 07:46 AM

5146p

Samui · 6 July 2016, 08:05 AM

They both look really good so its a close call for me. But im not the hugest fan of WTs so 5146p

AK797 · 6 July 2016, 08:17 AM

WT for me.

WJGESQ · 6 July 2016, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nyc2la

These two references have gotten some nice attention recently. If you were to pick one of the two in platinum, which would you choose?

Thanks in advance.

Pics borrowed from the interweb:

Wow that too one is sweeeeet.

locutus49 · 6 July 2016, 08:37 AM

WT for me.

cervantes · 6 July 2016, 08:49 AM

WT for me too.

KarlS · 6 July 2016, 08:59 AM

WT fan boy I am

incontrol · 6 July 2016, 09:58 AM

WT for me also! Such an interesting dial with the guilloche detail in the center.

mps354 · 6 July 2016, 10:27 AM

Of those two, 5146p for me. I'd go world time if you were thinking 5110p

jon_jon · 6 July 2016, 11:06 AM

Both are very nice watches. As you know the 5130P was just discontinued. The 5146P has been around 10 years and still in production. it comes down to if you prefer a World Time or an Annual Calendar, but a platinum Patek is also nice!

soundserious · 6 July 2016, 11:11 AM

5146 for me, more useful

KarlS · 6 July 2016, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jon_jon

Both are very nice watches. As you know the 5130P was just discontinued. The 5146P has been around 10 years and still in production. it comes down to if you prefer a World Time or an Annual Calendar, but a platinum Patek is also nice!

And no 5230P so is that for 2017 or do we see a 5131P

daytonaTBR · 6 July 2016, 11:19 AM

5130 is just stunning

WatchinMD · 6 July 2016, 11:30 AM

WT for me.

Hamish · 6 July 2016, 11:37 AM

Both are nice depends what you are after

TimeOnHand · 6 July 2016, 11:39 AM

I am a big fan of the 5146 reference in any metal and dial combo!

(not my watch... Trying one on at a SH dealer)

codecow · 6 July 2016, 11:41 AM

If you don't have a calendar, I'd get the calendar.

nyc2la · 6 July 2016, 12:13 PM

Thanks everyone. I already have a PC and a PCC, so the WT seems like a more logical addition, but I do like both. I'm also a bigger fan of blue, so that also is influencing my decision.

Dancing Fire · 6 July 2016, 03:01 PM

The 5146 since I can't afford to travel.

Patekish · 6 July 2016, 04:01 PM

World Time

RUK · 6 July 2016, 05:07 PM

5130. They are both great choices. The WT is very useful if you need that kind of time zone tracking. The AC is a great every day complication but the 5146 dial layout doesn't work for me

topcat30093 · 6 July 2016, 09:04 PM

Personally, I have no need for a World Time complication.
So my decision is easy the 5146P.
But with your current, I can see why you would choose the 5130P.
Lovely dilemma to be in 😊

Flex368 · 6 July 2016, 09:27 PM

Looking at the PPs you already own I´d skip both references.

If I had to buy one I´d go for the 5146P.

Tony64 · 6 July 2016, 09:35 PM

Based on looks alone I'd choose the WT, although the AC is by far the more practical. (Funny, using the word 'practical' to refer to a Patek)

That said, based on your current collection the AC does seem redundant, so there's really no contest here.

Tony64 · 6 July 2016, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mps354

Of those two, 5146p for me. I'd go world time if you were thinking 5110p

Personal preference of course, but I agree with you that the 5110 seems like the better aesthetic choice with respect to the WT's.

KarlS · 6 July 2016, 09:43 PM

No contest considering your collection. Forget the 5110 and its stubby little hands although has string following. Wears small for me.

dom007 · 6 July 2016, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flex368

Looking at the PPs you already own I´d skip both references.

I second this.

rebel_1 · 7 July 2016, 12:02 AM

Woo! You're killing it this year!

For this, I'd go with the WT. Also, I'm not a fan of that AC reference.

Jetkopite · 7 July 2016, 12:21 AM

WT for me it looks gorgeous that one.. With a annual calendar PP I would never be happy as I would always crave a Perpetual calendar Patek.

6 July 2016, 07:44 AM	#1
nyc2la "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Stephen Location: Beach Watch: 16660 Posts: 9,181	5130p vs. 5146p These two references have gotten some nice attention recently. If you were to pick one of the two in platinum, which would you choose? Thanks in advance. Pics borrowed from the interweb: __________________ "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE

6 July 2016, 09:58 AM	#9
incontrol "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Kevin Location: Somewhere in PA Watch: All of them... Posts: 10,355	WT for me also! Such an interesting dial with the guilloche detail in the center. __________________ Patek Philippe Rolex

6 July 2016, 11:11 AM	#12
soundserious "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: usofmfa Posts: 3,157	5146 for me, more useful __________________ Instagram: soundsoserious

6 July 2016, 11:39 AM	#17
TimeOnHand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Hong Kong Watch: Rolex Air-King Posts: 4,468	I am a big fan of the 5146 reference in any metal and dial combo! (not my watch... Trying one on at a SH dealer) __________________ Instagram: timeonhand1010

6 July 2016, 12:13 PM	#19
nyc2la "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Stephen Location: Beach Watch: 16660 Posts: 9,181	Thanks everyone. I already have a PC and a PCC, so the WT seems like a more logical addition, but I do like both. I'm also a bigger fan of blue, so that also is influencing my decision. __________________ "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE

6 July 2016, 07:46 AM	#2
rolex_addict "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: . Posts: 831	5146p

6 July 2016, 08:05 AM	#3
Samui Banned Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Tokyo Posts: 611	They both look really good so its a close call for me. But im not the hugest fan of WTs so 5146p

6 July 2016, 08:17 AM	#4
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,270	WT for me.

6 July 2016, 08:37 AM	#6
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	WT for me.

6 July 2016, 08:49 AM	#7
cervantes "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Jay Location: East and West Posts: 1,894	WT for me too.

6 July 2016, 08:59 AM	#8
KarlS Banned Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Karl Location: Kuwait Posts: 5,228	WT fan boy I am

6 July 2016, 10:27 AM	#10
mps354 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: CT Posts: 8,974	Of those two, 5146p for me. I'd go world time if you were thinking 5110p

6 July 2016, 11:06 AM	#11
jon_jon "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Posts: 4,341	Both are very nice watches. As you know the 5130P was just discontinued. The 5146P has been around 10 years and still in production. it comes down to if you prefer a World Time or an Annual Calendar, but a platinum Patek is also nice!

6 July 2016, 11:19 AM	#14
daytonaTBR "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: N/A Posts: 1,466	5130 is just stunning

6 July 2016, 11:30 AM	#15
WatchinMD "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: Larry Location: Maryland Watch: Saxonia Moonphase Posts: 3,428	WT for me.

6 July 2016, 11:37 AM	#16
Hamish "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Earth Watch: 5575 Posts: 1,674	Both are nice depends what you are after

6 July 2016, 11:41 AM	#18
codecow "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Louis Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: PP 5131R Posts: 4,832	If you don't have a calendar, I'd get the calendar.

6 July 2016, 03:01 PM	#20
Dancing Fire "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: Ca. Posts: 278	The 5146 since I can't afford to travel.

6 July 2016, 04:01 PM	#21
Patekish "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 37	World Time

6 July 2016, 05:07 PM	#22
RUK "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Ruk Location: .ie Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P Posts: 1,232	5130. They are both great choices. The WT is very useful if you need that kind of time zone tracking. The AC is a great every day complication but the 5146 dial layout doesn't work for me __________________ 'The best watch out there is the one you like the most'

6 July 2016, 09:04 PM	#23
topcat30093 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: England Posts: 5,425	Personally, I have no need for a World Time complication. So my decision is easy the 5146P. But with your current, I can see why you would choose the 5130P. Lovely dilemma to be in 😊 __________________

6 July 2016, 09:27 PM	#24
Flex368 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Felix Location: GMT +1 Watch: Yes! Posts: 2,977	Looking at the PPs you already own I´d skip both references. If I had to buy one I´d go for the 5146P.

6 July 2016, 09:35 PM	#25
Tony64 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 2,796	Based on looks alone I'd choose the WT, although the AC is by far the more practical. (Funny, using the word 'practical' to refer to a Patek) That said, based on your current collection the AC does seem redundant, so there's really no contest here.

6 July 2016, 09:43 PM	#27
KarlS Banned Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Karl Location: Kuwait Posts: 5,228	No contest considering your collection. Forget the 5110 and its stubby little hands although has string following. Wears small for me.

7 July 2016, 12:02 AM	#29
rebel_1 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 2,132	Woo! You're killing it this year! For this, I'd go with the WT. Also, I'm not a fan of that AC reference. __________________ Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017

7 July 2016, 12:21 AM	#30
Jetkopite "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Andy Location: Dubai Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T Posts: 1,559	WT for me it looks gorgeous that one.. With a annual calendar PP I would never be happy as I would always crave a Perpetual calendar Patek.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)