The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 March 2017, 06:51 AM   #1
KNY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: TBD
Posts: 292
Red Submariner - Luminous material on hands

Does anyone have a macro shot of what the luminous material on the hands of a red sub should look like? Is it generally the same as the lume plots on the dial (textured), or should it be smoother and glossy? Sorry for the noob question, I tried to find the answer but I'm coming up empty handed.
Thanks all!
KNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2017, 07:32 AM   #2
estorlie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Eric Storlie
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18
The luminous material in the hands should look approximately the same as the material on the dial. I'd be careful of anything that has a glossy or "wet" look to it, as this can be a sign of a poor re-lume job.
estorlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2017, 10:38 AM   #3
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
There is often a waffle-like texture to the tritium on the hour plots that will not be present on the hands, mainly because the surface area is much smaller on the hands. The hands should be fairly smooth in texture and matte, like on my '72 5512. (Note the different texture on the hour plots.)

Can you post a photo of the dial/hands in question? And by the way, it's not specific to red Subs. Rolex would have used the same technique on other models too.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 5512-Waffle.jpg (284.0 KB, 297 views)
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2017, 01:43 PM   #4
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,194
Here you go.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Img_0156sm.jpg (88.7 KB, 283 views)
File Type: jpg Img_0155sm.jpg (72.6 KB, 285 views)
File Type: jpg Img_0155smallest.jpg (77.2 KB, 283 views)
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2017, 02:37 PM   #5
michael067
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: TT DJ 16233
Posts: 1,002
michael067 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2017, 02:55 PM   #6
V.lats97nsx
2024 Pledge Member
 
V.lats97nsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 3,861


1665 rail

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
V.lats97nsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2017, 03:12 PM   #7
KNY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: TBD
Posts: 292
Thanks for the replies and the pictures guys, this is very helpful. I think I'm feeling a bit better about what I'm seeing here. I tried to take some pictures with my phone but this is the best I could get. Let me know what you think.
KNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2017, 03:18 PM   #8
KNY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: TBD
Posts: 292
Pic didn't post. This should work. What I thought I was seeing was a bit of that glossiness that was mentioned. Anything look off to anyone?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG-20170303-WA0001.jpg (45.1 KB, 249 views)
KNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2017, 07:03 AM   #9
dbhak22
2024 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 2,958
Here are a couple of my 1680, not a 'red' but the tritium isn't any different, :)



__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2017, 06:21 AM   #10
jedly1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
Looks fine , right down to the original hairlines creeping in !!

A good way to look is with a UV loupe , you'll see during that period tiny crystals of luminous particles and it should be same on hands and dial
jedly1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2017, 12:58 PM   #11
ahantel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5512, 1016, 1675
Posts: 61
@jedly1 and @springer - one thing i was curious about on the OP's hands was the three spokes of the mercedes symbol. Aren't they supposed to be thicker? They seem thinner than the other pictures posted and other tritium sub hands I remember but I'll defer to you. Just curious, thanks!
ahantel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2017, 06:16 PM   #12
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
Here you go
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2014-05-26 17.18.18.jpg (78.4 KB, 86 views)
File Type: jpg 2014-05-26 17.19.48.jpg (70.1 KB, 84 views)
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.