ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

xjeeunitx · 4 May 2012, 07:34 AM

To the OP, I know you already made up your mind. I'll tell you my story...

Had a Sub-C for about a year, sold Sub-C for the PO 8500, sold the PO 8500, I repurchased the PO 8500.

I could have easily got back the Sub but I didn't. Reasons are.... the watch is bang for the buck. It is simply one of the best divers out there RIGHT NOW. It got more wrist time than my Explorer II 42mm.

The only thing is that Omegas do not keep it's resale value like Rolex. To save yourself the heartache, always purchased used Omega and you will never go wrong.

htc8p · 4 May 2012, 05:01 PM

why would you want to sell such a perfect watch???

amvd · 8 May 2012, 11:08 PM

I wouldn´t do it, you will regret it

mannyv11 · 8 May 2012, 11:44 PM

I would keep the sub, just my 2 cents

patek.wis · 11 May 2012, 05:31 AM

Ive owned em - and I still have the 116610 I got in August.

The sub C is ridiculously nice, and i sometimes consider selling when its on the winder, but i put it back on and look down and realize i just cannot part with it

youll miss the HELL out of it

two months ago i had a spring bar get lost in a strap change issue, and i waited 2 weeks for a new bar - longest 2 weeks of my life (and i have other nice watches).
i missed the sub.

I owned the 16610 and got rid of it, never looked back. The 116610 is timeless and had the things I needed (bigger markers, A/R on date, cermaic bezel and nice bracelet).

Be happy with the Sub my friend, or youll end up buying it back at a premium when prices go up ;)

wetoey · 14 May 2012, 10:56 AM

stay with subc it's a better watch than PO 8500
IMHO

4 May 2012, 07:34 AM	#61
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,430	To the OP, I know you already made up your mind. I'll tell you my story... Had a Sub-C for about a year, sold Sub-C for the PO 8500, sold the PO 8500, I repurchased the PO 8500. I could have easily got back the Sub but I didn't. Reasons are.... the watch is bang for the buck. It is simply one of the best divers out there RIGHT NOW. It got more wrist time than my Explorer II 42mm. The only thing is that Omegas do not keep it's resale value like Rolex. To save yourself the heartache, always purchased used Omega and you will never go wrong.

4 May 2012, 05:01 PM	#62
htc8p "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Bert Location: philippines Watch: 116710 ln Posts: 3,442	why would you want to sell such a perfect watch???

8 May 2012, 11:08 PM	#63
amvd "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Alejandro Location: uruguay Watch: your step! Posts: 430	I wouldn´t do it, you will regret it

8 May 2012, 11:44 PM	#64
mannyv11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Manny Location: MA Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona Posts: 4,444	I would keep the sub, just my 2 cents

11 May 2012, 05:31 AM	#65
patek.wis "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Will Location: Canada Watch: The Sky Posts: 1,824	Ive owned em - and I still have the 116610 I got in August. The sub C is ridiculously nice, and i sometimes consider selling when its on the winder, but i put it back on and look down and realize i just cannot part with it youll miss the HELL out of it two months ago i had a spring bar get lost in a strap change issue, and i waited 2 weeks for a new bar - longest 2 weeks of my life (and i have other nice watches). i missed the sub. I owned the 16610 and got rid of it, never looked back. The 116610 is timeless and had the things I needed (bigger markers, A/R on date, cermaic bezel and nice bracelet). Be happy with the Sub my friend, or youll end up buying it back at a premium when prices go up ;)

14 May 2012, 10:56 AM	#66
wetoey "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Bangkok Watch: Rolex, AP and JLC Posts: 136	stay with subc it's a better watch than PO 8500 IMHO

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)