ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Hamish · 8 October 2016, 10:17 PM

I think it looks pretty good and after seeing this I am sure that the 5711p will look even better

texex91 · 8 October 2016, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hamish

I think it looks pretty good and after seeing this I am sure that the 5711p will look even better

So you in?

Hamish · 8 October 2016, 11:13 PM

Maybe....have to decide by Monday.
I wish I could see a wrist shot!

KarlS · 9 October 2016, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PJ S

^
You think?
Those expensive glass vanity indices do absolutely nothing to enhance the appearance of the watch.
In fact, they’re a major detractor to my eyes – and the tramp stamp is still far from subtle.

I didn't even notice the batons to be honest. I don't necessarily even like the Nautilus range so I am possibly inherently biased but I don't think it's as bad as the original pictures and it's just a lot of chest bashing for actually not a bad looking watch!!!

KarlS · 9 October 2016, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hamish

Maybe....have to decide by Monday.
I wish I could see a wrist shot!

What's the worse that can happen.....you say no 6 months later???? You think there aren't 1000 people waiting for their chance???

martinr · 9 October 2016, 12:48 AM

If the large 5976 was in steel, no diamonds and no embossed 40th anniversary date on the dial, priced like the 5980 was priced, Patek would sell all they could make. I know, it's not conservative, understated, subtle, in the tradition of Patek, but, it would be a great looking modern watch.

texex91 · 9 October 2016, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinr

If the large 5976 was in steel, no diamonds and no embossed 40th anniversary date on the dial, priced like the 5980 was priced, Patek would sell all they could make. I know, it's not conservative, understated, subtle, in the tradition of Patek, but, it would be a great looking modern watch.

I would agree with that and have a feeling we will see more from them in the coming years in this size and SS.

AJW232 · 9 October 2016, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hamish

Maybe....have to decide by Monday.
I wish I could see a wrist shot!

Patekaholic has put one up on his Instagram feed now.

SearChart · 9 October 2016, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AJW232

Patekaholic has put one up on his Instagram feed now.

Yes.
Stunning watch, still not sure about the text on the dial though.

Hamish · 9 October 2016, 06:22 AM

I will have a look

Quote:

Originally Posted by AJW232

Patekaholic has put one up on his Instagram feed now.

MattCH · 9 October 2016, 10:20 PM

We have to wait to see it in person. Even the text on the dial, i'm sure that is not going to bee so visible in person.

9 October 2016, 10:20 PM	#221
MattCH "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: EU Watch: PP/ROLEX Posts: 165	We have to wait to see it in person. Even the text on the dial, i'm sure that is not going to bee so visible in person. __________________

8 October 2016, 10:17 PM	#211
Hamish "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Earth Watch: 5575 Posts: 1,674	I think it looks pretty good and after seeing this I am sure that the 5711p will look even better

8 October 2016, 11:13 PM	#213
Hamish "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Earth Watch: 5575 Posts: 1,674	Maybe....have to decide by Monday. I wish I could see a wrist shot!

9 October 2016, 12:48 AM	#216
martinr "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: California Posts: 3,099	If the large 5976 was in steel, no diamonds and no embossed 40th anniversary date on the dial, priced like the 5980 was priced, Patek would sell all they could make. I know, it's not conservative, understated, subtle, in the tradition of Patek, but, it would be a great looking modern watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)