The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 8 December 2016, 02:58 AM   #31
iliketime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: NYC
Watch: 16570, 16710
Posts: 769
if you have the money to blow
iliketime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2016, 03:07 AM   #32
locutus49
2017 Pledge Member
 
locutus49's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 8,722
Not to my taste. But I appreciate the workmanship. You have to be a person who realizes the exquisite workmanship that is not visible to the eye. That knowledge itself is valuable to the right person.
__________________
"Dig and be dug" Langston Hughes

"Sunt rupes virtutis iter"

"Send me" Isaiah 6:8
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2016, 04:51 AM   #33
PJ S
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 2,582
http://www.watchprosite.com/seiko/-s...163.8124603/0/
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2016, 05:13 AM   #34
locutus49
2017 Pledge Member
 
locutus49's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 8,722
Great link.

__________________
"Dig and be dug" Langston Hughes

"Sunt rupes virtutis iter"

"Send me" Isaiah 6:8
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2017, 10:47 AM   #35
Desibaba
"TRF" Member
 
Desibaba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Watch: Sub,Pam90,SA2
Posts: 467
Unlike most of you gentlemen im not a watch expert but I have worked in the luxury car market for a while now. Reminds me of Lexus releasing the LFA a few years ago. Beautiful vehicle but at almost half a mill most people would much rather go for a Ferrari or Lamborghini. I think thats the dilemma for anyone who is thinking about spending that much on a "Seiko".
Desibaba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2017, 03:22 PM   #36
PJ S
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 2,582
Many people outside these virtual walls (here and other forums) actually just buy what they like, and don’t have a crisis of conscious over the name on the dial!
As for your Lexus analogy – it mattered not what “most” people would’ve rathered, since they sold every one they produced, and probably could’ve sold more if they really wanted to milk it for all it was worth.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2017, 03:21 AM   #37
RichburgHill
2017 Pledge Member
 
RichburgHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Recalculating
Watch: Omega 300M Blue
Posts: 224
Love the watch, but just changing metal content doesn't justify the price. IMO
Still, 53 jewel and super nice.
RichburgHill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2017, 08:10 AM   #38
PJ S
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 2,582
^
This watch has several properties (the case material not being one of them), which are unique to this Grand Seiko model.
You need to increase your knowledge of current Grand Seikos to appreciate why your conclusion is incorrectly drawn.

Last edited by padi56; 7 March 2017 at 05:38 PM..
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2017, 10:50 AM   #39
timemachines
"TRF" Member
 
timemachines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: California/Canada
Watch: JLC Reverso
Posts: 36
Wonder how it will fare on the second hand market...
timemachines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 11:12 AM   #40
vukotab
"TRF" Member
 
vukotab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,811
While its price is a bit steep, Grand Seiko (as a brand) should be handled in person to be fully appreciated and I'm sure that this one in platinum is really something awesome.

IMHO, Grand Seiko produces truly wonderful watches, with awesome fit and finish and cutting-edge Spring Drive and HEQ quartz movements.
__________________
My fashion blog and Instagram:
https://stylebyvukota.com/
https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/
vukotab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2017, 01:44 AM   #41
Knappo 1307
2017 HULK Pledge Member
 
Knappo 1307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 5,276
Beautiful watch, but I could find many other ways to spend 55k....
Knappo 1307 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2017, 04:29 PM   #42
ijpx
"TRF" Member
 
ijpx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 29
Gorgeous watch. Again GS overpriced their watch, and this price has fallen into their top of the line Credor range.
ijpx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2017, 08:10 PM   #43
ajas
"TRF" Member
 
ajas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Will
Location: Singapore
Watch: SubC, Pam, Speede
Posts: 1,542
Nice but fortunately don't have spare 55 grand
ajas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2017, 08:06 AM   #44
breitlings
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Watch: Roku
Posts: 3,391
55 for a toyota. Yes. 55 for a Seiko no matter how grand. No.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2017, 02:40 AM   #45
vladamir15
2017 Pledge Member
 
vladamir15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Amir
Location: San antonio
Watch: datejust 36 & ii
Posts: 754
Ehh not worth it imo
__________________
The Most Valuable Commodity is Time
vladamir15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2017, 10:43 PM   #46
statsman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 165
Beautiful.

Someday, someone will create a high quality, high finish wrist watch with absolutely no brand name or marketing info ("50m" or "Swiss") on the dial. Just an elegant, simple and pure watch. And they will change the industry.
statsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2017, 02:42 AM   #47
PJ S
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 2,582
^
Already done – H Moser & Cie.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2017, 03:54 AM   #48
breitlings
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Watch: Roku
Posts: 3,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by statsman View Post
Beautiful.

Someday, someone will create a high quality, high finish wrist watch with absolutely no brand name or marketing info ("50m" or "Swiss") on the dial. Just an elegant, simple and pure watch. And they will change the industry.
I think there is a thought that Rolex are no more durable or reliable than an average ETA watch. With the breguet overcoil/microstella and no lever I would suggest that is false. Especially with the grueling punishment Rolex puts their watches through before letting them out the door. They don't just make sure the dial lines up perfectly, it is my understanding they actually try to break the watches in various tests before releasing them because one of the watches they gave an American VIP broke during golf and they decided that was very bad for the brand.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2017, 01:42 AM   #49
tom2517
"TRF" Member
 
tom2517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 743
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
Not to my taste. But I appreciate the workmanship. You have to be a person who realizes the exquisite workmanship that is not visible to the eye. That knowledge itself is valuable to the right person.
Yep, the finishing on this watch is exceptional, but you have to know how to look. Someone in the previous post said a Patek Calatrava has more finishing but it doesn't. In fact this GS is far better (Though for the same price, the Eichi II is even better in my opinion).

Of course, if it's not easy to tell, then what's the point? So a watch like this, is really for someone who cares and appreciate little details.
tom2517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2017, 01:33 PM   #50
speedmaster73
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
I think there is a thought that Rolex are no more durable or reliable than an average ETA watch. With the breguet overcoil/microstella and no lever I would suggest that is false. Especially with the grueling punishment Rolex puts their watches through before letting them out the door. They don't just make sure the dial lines up perfectly, it is my understanding they actually try to break the watches in various tests before releasing them because one of the watches they gave an American VIP broke during golf and they decided that was very bad for the brand.
rolex just 'market' there tests better. all watch companies in their range do the same tests.


http://www.iwc.com/en/about/manufacture/#TESTS
speedmaster73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2017, 03:15 PM   #51
breitlings
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Watch: Roku
Posts: 3,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedmaster73 View Post
rolex just 'market' there tests better. all watch companies in their range do the same tests.


http://www.iwc.com/en/about/manufacture/#TESTS
That's simply not true. Posting that one company may do it would only invalidate a statement that "Only" Rolex does it. You would have to post similar tests for every watch in the "range" to prove that. I know for example Breitling doesn't, just look at the b55/b50. Maybe you should research Rolex Comex machines a bit, or the fact that every single watch is tested before leaving the factory. Were you aware one of the Speedmasters completely failed on the moon?

"It is a fact that an Omega Speedmaster had its crystal knocked off during Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) on an Apollo mission, thus rendering the watch useless." http://www.rolexmagazine.com/2008/06...iii-story.html

The IWC tests you have linked to is for general watch designs in the "prototype" phase but perhaps they test all their pilots series: "several months which are designed for new watches at the prototype phase or later as part of the approval process for the pilot series."

Rolex tests every individual watch that leaves their factory. I believe it is said that they if a Rolex breaks they want it to break at the factory. Just one reason it takes about a year for a Rolex to leave the factory.

Anyway we can agree to disagree, happy easter.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2017, 05:41 PM   #52
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Posts: 10,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
Technically impressive but not worth the price IMHO.
For that level of money I'd go with a PP.
Of course, you can have a very cool PP or a Voutilainen if you want exclusivity, I really don't think it's worth 55k... Plus on such a piece I expect to see a beautiful movement, not a big base plate, however well finished it is. Point is that at that price point you have a ton of great looking watches from the best brands or small independents in the business, for me spending 55k on this watch is totally nuts, but probably sole will do it, like the guy in PJ's link who gave up a 5980 to get one, much prefer the PP
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 01:51 AM   #53
PJ S
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 2,582
The laughable thing for me here, is many (most?) wouldn’t bat an eyelid at the similarly priced Platinum Daytona (of which Rolex make a damn sight more than just 20 of, each year), but will raise all sorts of objections as to why a Grand Seiko has no right to occupy the same market segment.
It truly would be comedic, if it wasn’t such as sad indictment of everything wrong with brand snobbery!

Arnaud, when it comes to exclusivity, what number do you consider that to be?
Are you of the opinion that 20 pieces produced annually is mass production?
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 05:42 PM   #54
tom2517
"TRF" Member
 
tom2517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 743
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
Of course, you can have a very cool PP or a Voutilainen if you want exclusivity, I really don't think it's worth 55k... Plus on such a piece I expect to see a beautiful movement, not a big base plate, however well finished it is. Point is that at that price point you have a ton of great looking watches from the best brands or small independents in the business, for me spending 55k on this watch is totally nuts, but probably sole will do it, like the guy in PJ's link who gave up a 5980 to get one, much prefer the PP
Watches that comes out of the Seiko Micro Artist Studio are special, like Hodinkee said, if you get it, you get it.

But I also understand most just can't past the Seiko brand.

Disclaimer: I have one.
tom2517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Banner Of The Month
*Banner Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright 2004-2017, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.