ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Amiroo · 17 October 2017, 11:07 AM

Check it out, would like to hear your thoughts.

https://vancouver.craigslist.ca/van/...346635623.html

saskmh · 17 October 2017, 11:11 AM

Not worth 10k.

Kyle13 · 17 October 2017, 11:14 AM

It’s worth whatever those gen parts would go for on the open market. But as a complete watch like it is, not worth the 10k.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nick c · 17 October 2017, 11:14 AM

$10 only

Amiroo · 17 October 2017, 11:14 AM

It's stainless steel but gold plated!lol ya not worth 10k

Thuilln · 17 October 2017, 11:20 AM

The first word that comes to my mind is: insane. Then a few others, but I will not disclose them here.

Kyle13 · 17 October 2017, 11:30 AM

I’ve always been open to building a “Rolex”. I think it would be fun to collect parts over the course of a year or something and then build the watch.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mnicolini300 · 17 October 2017, 12:47 PM

I wouldn’t pay half that price..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

socalwatchcollector · 17 October 2017, 04:01 PM

Does he accept payment to throw it away?

crowncollection · 17 October 2017, 09:02 PM

not for me. Gold plate is not my style

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

007timer · 18 October 2017, 02:45 AM

Very interesting watch to say the least. For that kind of money you can buy something else that’s not pieces together.

cajunron · 18 October 2017, 03:02 AM

This guy is smoking rope.

Dustytrail · 23 October 2017, 01:02 AM

unfortunately it is not worth the asking price - even if you consider the watch in parts

a genuine 1680 can go for less than $10000

since this is a franken watch that is built from parts, the case's serial number may not necessarily correspond with the movement's serial number and therefore RSC may not touch the watch even if the potential buyer restores the watch to its former glory. Not to mention, the case restoration process (to remove the gold plating) may reshape the case in a bad way

Regardless · 24 October 2017, 03:50 AM

Even if the parts are gen.. I’d say a rolex is more than just the sum of its parts, so no.

17 October 2017, 11:07 AM	#1
Amiroo "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: Canada Watch: Royal Oak Chrono Posts: 301	Frankenstein Rolex on Craigslist. Is it worth anything!? Check it out, would like to hear your thoughts. https://vancouver.craigslist.ca/van/...346635623.html __________________ Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710

17 October 2017, 11:11 AM	#2
saskmh "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 1,027	Not worth 10k. __________________ RCN (Canadian) Tudor Milsub database co-manager

17 October 2017, 11:14 AM	#5
Amiroo "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: Canada Watch: Royal Oak Chrono Posts: 301	It's stainless steel but gold plated!lol ya not worth 10k __________________ Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710

17 October 2017, 11:20 AM	#6
Thuilln "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Real Name: Nick Location: YUL Watch: 16570 Posts: 1,936	The first word that comes to my mind is: insane. Then a few others, but I will not disclose them here. __________________ Nick _________________________________________ 14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver

17 October 2017, 09:02 PM	#10
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,157	not for me. Gold plate is not my style Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

17 October 2017, 11:14 AM	#3
Kyle13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 484	It’s worth whatever those gen parts would go for on the open market. But as a complete watch like it is, not worth the 10k. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

17 October 2017, 11:14 AM	#4
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	$10 only

17 October 2017, 11:30 AM	#7
Kyle13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 484	I’ve always been open to building a “Rolex”. I think it would be fun to collect parts over the course of a year or something and then build the watch. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

17 October 2017, 12:47 PM	#8
Mnicolini300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Marco Nicolini Location: Dallas Watch: 16610 LV Posts: 557	I wouldn’t pay half that price.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

17 October 2017, 04:01 PM	#9
socalwatchcollector "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: John Location: newport beach Watch: Pateks Plural Posts: 1,621	Does he accept payment to throw it away?

18 October 2017, 02:45 AM	#11
007timer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: US Watch: BLNR Posts: 1,383	Very interesting watch to say the least. For that kind of money you can buy something else that’s not pieces together.

18 October 2017, 03:02 AM	#12
cajunron 2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Southeastern USA Watch: Omega Seamaster PO Posts: 3,852	This guy is smoking rope. __________________

23 October 2017, 01:02 AM	#13
Dustytrail "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: In your basement? Watch: Oysterquartz Posts: 88	unfortunately it is not worth the asking price - even if you consider the watch in parts a genuine 1680 can go for less than $10000 since this is a franken watch that is built from parts, the case's serial number may not necessarily correspond with the movement's serial number and therefore RSC may not touch the watch even if the potential buyer restores the watch to its former glory. Not to mention, the case restoration process (to remove the gold plating) may reshape the case in a bad way

24 October 2017, 03:50 AM	#14
Regardless "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: Jon Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex, PAM Posts: 26	Even if the parts are gen.. I’d say a rolex is more than just the sum of its parts, so no.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)