ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Al1969 · 7 March 2016, 10:51 AM

Hi everyone,
The more I see the 233, the more I want to own in. Just wondering what are everyone's thoughts on a possible trade. I'd rather not have the additional expense of adding another piece, so I have been considering trading my BLNR towards/for a 233. So I figure I'd post and get suggestions from fellow members.

Thanks,

dualcarb · 7 March 2016, 10:57 AM

I wouldn't trade a BLNR for a 233

Panerai Freak · 7 March 2016, 11:29 AM

It all depends on what you're after; if it's investment, then I'd keep the BLNR. If it's for enjoyment and you have a way to do a straight trade (or to your advantage), then I would definitely go for the 233.

The PAM 233 is one of my favorite watches and it keeps growing on me the longer I own it.

Personally, I would get rid of the 111 and add a little money to get a 233.

Al1969 · 7 March 2016, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panerai Freak

It all depends on what you're after; if it's investment, then I'd keep the BLNR. If it's for enjoyment and you have a way to do a straight trade (or to your advantage), then I would definitely go for the 233.

The PAM 233 is one of my favorite watches and it keeps growing on me the longer I own it.

Personally, I would get rid of the 111 and add a little money to get a 233.

Thanks for th suggestion on the 111. I have considered that as well. I think right now from my small collection, I'd consider the 111 and/or BLNR for a potential trade towards the 233. Any idea what year they stopped the dot dial?

Panerai Freak · 7 March 2016, 11:54 AM

The 233 dot ran from series I through K (I 1,500 units, J 1,000 units, K 2,000 units). The AM/PM started with the L series (1,000 units) in 2010.

nick c · 7 March 2016, 11:56 AM

I would trade for the 233 it's awesome I'm not a big fan of the Blnr.

Rogdogg · 7 March 2016, 11:59 AM

I think the 233 is a great watch but I much prefer the BLNR so that's what I have. However, it sounds like you're preferring the 233 so go for it. If you prefer the 233 over the BLNR but you keep the BLNR then I think the only reason you would do that is for the financial side of things, value retention of the BLNR and that's the wrong way to look at it if you ask me.

Pattyb69 · 7 March 2016, 12:11 PM

I was in your position about a year ago. I owned an 114060 and a BLNR at the time and even though I could justify owning both in the same collection, I found the wearing experience to be similar.

I ended up trading my BLNR for a 233 and even though I miss the BLNR I don't regret the decision. I'd rather have one Rolex sports model and one Panerai instead of two Rolex sport models. I'll add the BLNR again down the road.

I mean look how pretty she is

superstarmar · 7 March 2016, 12:15 PM

I wouldn't do it ... Keep the BLNR !!!
It's a timeless beauty ...

Cru Jones · 7 March 2016, 12:20 PM

Trade away. BLNR is nice, but 233 > BLNR.

Edit: I just saw you'd consider trading the 111 instead of the BLNR.... I think I'd do that, instead, if I had the cash to make up the difference. I wouldn't "need" the 111 with the 233 in the stable.

Al1969 · 7 March 2016, 12:33 PM

Thanks for all the advice. Still gotta decide which direction to go.

Panerai Freak · 7 March 2016, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pattyb69

I was in your position about a year ago. I owned an 114060 and a BLNR at the time and even though I could justify owning both in the same collection, I found the wearing experience to be similar.

I ended up trading my BLNR for a 233 and even though I miss the BLNR I don't regret the decision. I'd rather have one Rolex sports model and one Panerai instead of two Rolex sport models. I'll add the BLNR again down the road.

I mean look how pretty she is

I concur!

Amazing pictures, BTW! That 233 must be proud of you!

Watcheroo · 7 March 2016, 05:57 PM

Well, neither watch is rare and both can be added when you want/can. I got rid of my hulk (that I had owned and enjoyed for 4 years) to fund the 233. I can't be more satisfied with the 233 and I'm sure a Rolex will find its way back to me in the future!

Go with what makes you smile.

Psmith · 7 March 2016, 08:55 PM

Imho the 233 is the more interesting watch. In a straight choice, I would pick the 233 over the BLNR.

Friedl41 · 7 March 2016, 10:33 PM

233

tjjma · 8 March 2016, 12:40 AM

Unfortunately the Panerai bug is real. Once you set your eyes on a model, it's hard to let go. After I got my first Panerai, I found that I started to wear my Rolex models less and less. So I say trade the BLNR for the 233.

I would sell my LVc to free up some funds after purchasing two Panerais in the past month but unfortunately the LVc has some sentimental value to me.

Pattyb69 · 8 March 2016, 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panerai Freak

I concur!

Amazing pictures, BTW! That 233 must be proud of you!

Thanks bud!

DOUBLE 0 SE7EN · 8 March 2016, 06:23 AM

As a pam321 and hulk owner I can clearly say that let the blnr go.. Pam233 is the most sexy watch ever seen...

TonyD · 8 March 2016, 06:28 AM

Given the rest of your collection I would not hesitate to swap them. I love my 233 and would recommend it to anyone. Best of luck to you!

jagwap · 8 March 2016, 03:12 PM

I have the GMTIIc LN and the 233 dot.

The GMTIIC may get more wrist time, due to size and flexibility, but the 233 is easily the favourite. Just pick it up out of the safe at the weekend and it's still ticking from the last one.

Smartyjones18 · 8 March 2016, 10:26 PM

Go for it, no regret for me even though the way i acquired my 233 was quite rediculers. I had listed my Rolex 16570 for sale and this gentleman asked whether would i accept trade with his 233, i thought whats 233 as i havent owned any pam at that time yet, but the moment i saw and put on my wrist, i knew i wont remove it. Its still one of my favorite watches to wear daily.

Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk

Cru Jones · 9 March 2016, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smartyjones18

Go for it, no regret for me even though the way i acquired my 233 was quite rediculers. I had listed my Rolex 16570 for sale and this gentleman asked whether would i accept trade with his 233, i thought whats 233 as i havent owned any pam at that time yet, but the moment i saw and put on my wrist, i knew i wont remove it. Its still one of my favorite watches to wear daily.

Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk

Wow, amazing/insane deal for you!!

kilyung · 9 March 2016, 08:25 AM

I'd trade for the 233

doc.kool · 9 March 2016, 09:59 AM

I would do it. The BLNR is awesome but the 233 is such a great watch. Great looking watch with very useful functions. You can really change the look of the watch with the rapid strap change. I've had mine for almost 9 years now. Good luck. Great news is that you will have a great watch either way

mikko333 · 9 March 2016, 10:22 AM

Stick with the blnr it's absolutely stunning.

One Ping Only · 9 March 2016, 10:47 AM

I have had both, still have the BLNR. I'd say trade the 111.

Jcgul · 9 March 2016, 10:08 PM

233 all day... its just perfection. Nothing else to be said. After wearing my 233, 40mm rolex's just seem insignificant. Especially on the wrist

simongpaez · 10 March 2016, 12:31 AM

233 is my favorite PAM, so I would

lmcgbaj · 10 March 2016, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doc.kool

Great picture. 233 looks like a monster in comparison.

Looks great but too large for my comfort.

BLNR is just the perfect size for me.

Al1969 · 10 March 2016, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doc.kool

I would do it. The BLNR is awesome but the 233 is such a great watch. Great looking watch with very useful functions. You can really change the look of the watch with the rapid strap change. I've had mine for almost 9 years now. Good luck. Great news is that you will have a great watch either way

Not making it easy with this pic. I'm gonna think long and hard bout the flip. Any idea what's the latest series on the 233?
Thanks

Thanks

7 March 2016, 10:51 AM	#1
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,607	Blnr for 233 ? Hi everyone, The more I see the 233, the more I want to own in. Just wondering what are everyone's thoughts on a possible trade. I'd rather not have the additional expense of adding another piece, so I have been considering trading my BLNR towards/for a 233. So I figure I'd post and get suggestions from fellow members. Thanks, __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

7 March 2016, 11:59 AM	#7
Rogdogg "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Bangkok Posts: 6,117	I think the 233 is a great watch but I much prefer the BLNR so that's what I have. However, it sounds like you're preferring the 233 so go for it. If you prefer the 233 over the BLNR but you keep the BLNR then I think the only reason you would do that is for the financial side of things, value retention of the BLNR and that's the wrong way to look at it if you ask me. __________________ Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

7 March 2016, 12:33 PM	#11
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,607	Thanks for all the advice. Still gotta decide which direction to go. __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

7 March 2016, 08:55 PM	#14
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Imho the 233 is the more interesting watch. In a straight choice, I would pick the 233 over the BLNR. __________________

7 March 2016, 10:33 PM	#15
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	233 __________________ Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a

7 March 2016, 10:57 AM	#2
dualcarb "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Patrick Location: HK/Malaysia Watch: Lover Posts: 1,222	I wouldn't trade a BLNR for a 233

7 March 2016, 11:29 AM	#3
Panerai Freak "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: US Posts: 42	It all depends on what you're after; if it's investment, then I'd keep the BLNR. If it's for enjoyment and you have a way to do a straight trade (or to your advantage), then I would definitely go for the 233. The PAM 233 is one of my favorite watches and it keeps growing on me the longer I own it. Personally, I would get rid of the 111 and add a little money to get a 233.

7 March 2016, 11:54 AM	#5
Panerai Freak "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: US Posts: 42	The 233 dot ran from series I through K (I 1,500 units, J 1,000 units, K 2,000 units). The AM/PM started with the L series (1,000 units) in 2010.

7 March 2016, 11:56 AM	#6
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	I would trade for the 233 it's awesome I'm not a big fan of the Blnr.

7 March 2016, 12:11 PM	#8
Pattyb69 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: CT Watch: BLNR\|LVC\|PAM 911 Posts: 1,085	I was in your position about a year ago. I owned an 114060 and a BLNR at the time and even though I could justify owning both in the same collection, I found the wearing experience to be similar. I ended up trading my BLNR for a 233 and even though I miss the BLNR I don't regret the decision. I'd rather have one Rolex sports model and one Panerai instead of two Rolex sport models. I'll add the BLNR again down the road. I mean look how pretty she is

7 March 2016, 12:15 PM	#9
superstarmar Banned Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: In Motion Watch: my wrist presence Posts: 7,436	I wouldn't do it ... Keep the BLNR !!! It's a timeless beauty ...

7 March 2016, 12:20 PM	#10
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,499	Trade away. BLNR is nice, but 233 > BLNR. Edit: I just saw you'd consider trading the 111 instead of the BLNR.... I think I'd do that, instead, if I had the cash to make up the difference. I wouldn't "need" the 111 with the 233 in the stable.

7 March 2016, 05:57 PM	#13
Watcheroo 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: CT Posts: 3,912	Well, neither watch is rare and both can be added when you want/can. I got rid of my hulk (that I had owned and enjoyed for 4 years) to fund the 233. I can't be more satisfied with the 233 and I'm sure a Rolex will find its way back to me in the future! Go with what makes you smile.

8 March 2016, 12:40 AM	#16
tjjma "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: San Francisco Posts: 237	Unfortunately the Panerai bug is real. Once you set your eyes on a model, it's hard to let go. After I got my first Panerai, I found that I started to wear my Rolex models less and less. So I say trade the BLNR for the 233. I would sell my LVc to free up some funds after purchasing two Panerais in the past month but unfortunately the LVc has some sentimental value to me.

8 March 2016, 06:23 AM	#18
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: KAAN Location: ISTANBUL Watch: Explorer-PAM233 Posts: 1,645	As a pam321 and hulk owner I can clearly say that let the blnr go.. Pam233 is the most sexy watch ever seen...

8 March 2016, 06:28 AM	#19
TonyD 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: Boston North Watch: Meteorite Daytona Posts: 1,456	Given the rest of your collection I would not hesitate to swap them. I love my 233 and would recommend it to anyone. Best of luck to you! __________________ Pepsi GMT/SD43/DSSD Blue/ DJ41 TT Rose Diamond Dial/ Daytona Meteorite/ SS Sky Dweller White Dial/ IWC Bronze Big Pilot/ Aquanautic Super King / Omega Ploprof 1200 / Graham Scarab Diver

8 March 2016, 03:12 PM	#20
jagwap "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: China Watch: IWC IW389001 Posts: 762	I have the GMTIIc LN and the 233 dot. The GMTIIC may get more wrist time, due to size and flexibility, but the 233 is easily the favourite. Just pick it up out of the safe at the weekend and it's still ticking from the last one.

8 March 2016, 10:26 PM	#21
Smartyjones18 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Singapore Posts: 769	Go for it, no regret for me even though the way i acquired my 233 was quite rediculers. I had listed my Rolex 16570 for sale and this gentleman asked whether would i accept trade with his 233, i thought whats 233 as i havent owned any pam at that time yet, but the moment i saw and put on my wrist, i knew i wont remove it. Its still one of my favorite watches to wear daily. Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk

9 March 2016, 08:25 AM	#23
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,870	I'd trade for the 233

9 March 2016, 09:59 AM	#24
doc.kool "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 610	I would do it. The BLNR is awesome but the 233 is such a great watch. Great looking watch with very useful functions. You can really change the look of the watch with the rapid strap change. I've had mine for almost 9 years now. Good luck. Great news is that you will have a great watch either way

9 March 2016, 10:22 AM	#25
mikko333 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Lincolnshire Watch: 1601 116520 BLNR Posts: 7	Stick with the blnr it's absolutely stunning.

9 March 2016, 10:47 AM	#26
One Ping Only "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Ken Location: WI Watch: several Posts: 1,639	I have had both, still have the BLNR. I'd say trade the 111. __________________ I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.

9 March 2016, 10:08 PM	#27
Jcgul "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: NYC Posts: 50	233 all day... its just perfection. Nothing else to be said. After wearing my 233, 40mm rolex's just seem insignificant. Especially on the wrist

10 March 2016, 12:31 AM	#28
simongpaez "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Simon Location: Houston Watch: Some Posts: 1,109	233 is my favorite PAM, so I would

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)