The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 February 2017, 12:10 PM   #1
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
The Key to Life

While reflecting upon a tragic incident that led to an earlier OP, I stumbled upon this keen insight...


Stanley Kubrick’s Unforgettable Answer

Playboy: If life is so purposeless, do you feel its worth living?

Kubrick: Yes, for those who manage somehow to cope with our mortality. The very meaninglessness of life forces a man to create his own meaning. Children, of course, begin life with an untarnished sense of wonder, a capacity to experience total joy at something as simple as the greenness of a leaf; but as they grow older, the awareness of death and decay begins to impinge on their consciousness and subtly erode their joie de vivre (a keen enjoyment of living), their idealism — and their assumption of immortality.

As a child matures, he sees death and pain everywhere about him, and begins to lose faith in the ultimate goodness of man. But if he’s reasonably strong — and lucky — he can emerge from this twilight of the soul into a rebirth of life’s élan (enthusiastic and assured vigor and liveliness).

Both because of and in spite of his awareness of the meaninglessness of life, he can forge a fresh sense of purpose and affirmation. He may not recapture the same pure sense of wonder he was born with, but he can shape something far more enduring and sustaining.

The most terrifying fact about the universe is not that it is hostile but that it is indifferent; but if we can come to terms with this indifference and accept the challenges of life within the boundaries of death — however mutable man may be able to make them — our existence as a species can have genuine meaning and fulfillment. However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light.
— Stanley Kubrick, interview with Playboy, Stanley Kubrick: Interviews

From <http://highexistence.com/secret-to-happiness/>
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 February 2017, 12:24 PM   #2
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 February 2017, 01:59 PM   #3
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,856
I love it. Thanks for sharing
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 February 2017, 03:26 PM   #4
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,655
Excellent!
Most people have the potential to make the world a better or worse place.
Many choose to try to make it better for themselves without regard for the impact on others.
The ones I admire are those who pursue their self interest with a determination that they will ALSO make it a better place for others.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 04:30 AM   #5
cajunron
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
cajunron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock View Post
Excellent!
Most people have the potential to make the world a better or worse place.
Many choose to try to make it better for themselves without regard for the impact on others.
The ones I admire are those who pursue their self interest with a determination that they will ALSO make it a better place for others.
Wow Rock. This is so incredibly true. VERY well said.
__________________
cajunron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 05:41 AM   #6
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock View Post
Most people have the potential to make the world a better or worse place. Many choose to try to make it better for themselves without regard for the impact on others. The ones I admire are those who pursue their self interest with a determination that they will ALSO make it a better place for others.
If we are to survive and flourish as a global community, your insight lays the essential groundwork.

Win-win scenarios are always difficult to come by as there is just so much (in terms of available resources) to go around. Avarice (whether personal or stemming from the corporate boardrooms) always seems to play a major role in pushing the world out of shape. And so the question remains, how much do we really need (as individuals) to ensure a better world for both ourselves and all parties concerned? Being somewhat of a minimalist (especially when it comes to personal and/or material possessions), I've always believed that an individual sense of 'less is more' remains critical to any pro-active initiatives/measures regarding global harmony (as well as the environment).
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 05:56 AM   #7
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
Hmm . . . disagree.

Kubrick and I have opposite worldviews even though we agree on some things because we are realists.

BristolCavendish describes "Kubrick's Unforgettable Answer" as a keen insight. I would describe it as shallow. To save space I'll address just one of his statements.

"The very meaninglessness of life forces a man to create his own meaning."

If one accepts the premise that life is meaningless (purposeless), then this is probably a true statement. The problem is that Kubrick presents this in a positive light.

It's not.

If you create your own meaning based on the belief that life is meaningless, then the life of meaning you create does not have a point of reference outside yourself. In other words, there is no right or wrong, no morality, outside of what you decide is moral. Murder, rape, cheating, and lying will not be judged immoral (in your mind) because you have created your own morality. In your world they have positive value if they create rewards for you personally.

Well, sorry to be the contrarian here but I find Kubrick's worldview, well . . . meaningless.

__________________
_________
<=>

You really need to be, not seem to be.

El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 06:43 AM   #8
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias View Post
If you create your own meaning based on the belief that life is meaningless, then the life of meaning you create does not have a point of reference outside yourself. In other words, there is no right or wrong, no morality, outside of what you decide is moral. Murder, rape, cheating, and lying will not be judged immoral (in your mind) because you have created your own morality. In your world they have positive value if they create rewards for you personally.
Wow. Are you basing your premise on 'A Clockwork Orange' which was more along the lines of a bleak warning rather than an endorsement of sociopathic behavior?

Human energy and efforts can obviously be channeled/expressed in a variety of ways and I'd like to believe that Kubrick's insights were based more on the positive rather than the dysfunctional.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 08:22 AM   #9
masyv6
2024 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,747
Great post
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 12:46 PM   #10
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
Wow. Are you basing your premise on 'A Clockwork Orange' . . .
Haven't seen the movie or read Burgess' book, so no. Just the quotes you provided.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
Human energy and efforts can obviously be channeled/expressed in a variety of ways and I'd like to believe that Kubrick's insights were based more on the positive rather than the dysfunctional.
He may well have focused on the positive but, in this quote, ignores the negative. And that is huge! A society made up of individuals who believe their lives are meaningless and must come up with their own meaning is chaos.
__________________
_________
<=>

You really need to be, not seem to be.

El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 01:19 PM   #11
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias View Post
A society made up of individuals who believe their lives are meaningless and must come up with their own meaning is chaos.
In most cases, a flock mentality ensures the overall stability of a society (until or unless there is a call for social upheaval which oftentimes amounts to chaos in its own right).

On the other hand, if not for a handful of truly visionary and talented individuals (who gave meaning and significance to an otherwise mundane world), we would not have experienced mankind's greatest contributions in the form of art, literature and music.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 01:44 PM   #12
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,655
Frank makes a good point that the 'nature' of the "meaning that you create" is obviously important.
"Meaning" can only be intuited by the individual as there is no 'universal rule book' to tell us what is meaningful and what is not.
Kubrick implicitly suggests that the "meaning" is a 'moral' or society-friendly, productive one as opposed to purely self-serving.
The 'asocial' or 'antisocial' personality may well ascribe a meaning that is not society-friendly and there will always be that clash of interpretations with those who see life as a 'survival of the fittest' or 100% self-interested.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2017, 05:53 PM   #13
gmh1013
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: greg
Location: Tempe AZ
Watch: GMT
Posts: 5,703
Life is pain....
Pain in struggle for success
Pain in struggle for failure
everyday you have choice
gmh1013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2017, 07:45 PM   #14
TG3N
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 249
Kubrick has leaned quite heavily on the Existentialist philosophy there, and in particular, Albert Camus' own variant on it - 'Absurdism', best discussed in his works 'L'Etranger' & 'The Myth of Sisyphus'.

I don't think the majority of people worry too much about the meaning of life in a day-to-day context - most are just plodding along, one day after the next, providing for themselves & their family, dealing with their struggles and taking their pleasures where they can. I suspect that for most, it's a concern that takes more precedence later, at the end-of-life stage. Of course, that's what art/artists like Kubrick are good for - making us think about the bigger issues.

I don't believe there has to be some over-arching meaning to life for mankind to be either moral or find meaning/joy in life.

Nor do I think the absence of that meaning of life is a positive or negative thing - it just is what it is, the reality.
TG3N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2017, 07:50 PM   #15
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
Dr. Sigmund said it best: You're one sick puppy.
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 01:50 AM   #16
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
I better clarify that I wasn't replying to anyone with this. ^

Just think it's right on the money.
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 05:39 AM   #17
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonBK View Post
Dr. Sigmund said it best: You're one sick puppy.
Dr. Freud was a notorious cokehead so we can take his insights with a grain of salt (as none of his theories have ever been proven). Kind of like 'the pot calling the kettle black'.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 06:13 AM   #18
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
Dr. Freud was a notorious cokehead so we can take his insights with a grain of salt (as none of his theories have ever been proven). Kind of like 'the pot calling the kettle black'.
Dr. Freud

I'm talking about my friend Dr. Sigmund Franz Hopfenstader who told me this (and it has been proven).
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 11:46 AM   #19
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonBK View Post
Dr. Sigmund said it best: You're one sick puppy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonBK View Post
Dr. Freud I'm talking about my friend Dr. Sigmund Franz Hopfenstader who told me this (and it has been proven).
Is your 'Dr. Hopfenstader' a psychologist or a veterinarian?
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 02:19 PM   #20
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,655
Dr. Hopfenstader is Mon's Analyst, hence his diagnosis "You're one sick puppy".
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 02:57 PM   #21
rolehex
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rolehex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,433
OP- Thanks for sharing. Kubrick fan here but I never heard that before. (guess I skipped the playboy articles)
rolehex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 05:41 PM   #22
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
Is your 'Dr. Hopfenstader' a psychologist or a veterinarian?
He's been my financial adviser for the past 30 years and we have a great relationship.

Whatever he tells me to invest in I do the opposite and it works just fine.
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2017, 06:23 PM   #23
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
The guy told me he had the key, wasn't sure if I should take him seriously though.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0719.JPG (56.2 KB, 396 views)
Muzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.