ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 December 2016, 09:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Gustavo
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 230
|
Rolex 1655 Explorer II Help
Hello all,
I would kindly ask for those with experience in this particular model to chime in and I would welcome any and all opinions. The pictures aren't the best and there are only 2, but from my research I can ascertain that it has a MK III bezel and either a MK IV or MK 5 dial. If anyone can make out the MK of the dial, I would appreciate an estimated year of production so I can compare with the serial number. The bracelet looks from post-80's so my amateur guess is that its around 81-83... Many thanks beforehand for any insights! Cheers |
30 December 2016, 10:09 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,857
|
Needs to be in the WatchOut section, IMO.
__________________
|
30 December 2016, 10:26 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
|
Looks like a MK IV dial, so serial number should be higher than 5mil. Case looks to be heavily polished.
|
30 December 2016, 10:41 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,802
|
Bracelet clasp appears fake.
|
30 December 2016, 01:12 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Gustavo
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 230
|
|
30 December 2016, 01:33 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,159
|
Clasp is fake need better pics to say much more
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
31 December 2016, 03:54 AM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,857
|
Compare your pictures to pictures of other 1655's here from trusted sellers. At a minimum, the clasp is fake. Possibly more.
__________________
|
31 December 2016, 09:52 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
Hi
I have a 1655. The pics are bloody awful (no insult intended but we need more clarity and detail) and I would say the dial and hands look good as does the bezel. The main body looks over polished but the pic is not good enough to say one way or the other. An over polished body can be improved quite a bit but it would not be perfect. The clasp is definitely dodgy but that's no big deal and easily corrected. Regards Mick |
6 January 2017, 11:21 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Gustavo
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 230
|
Quote:
Cheers |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.