ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 March 2023, 08:36 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Seattle
Watch: 14060M 116610LV
Posts: 267
|
The issue with Speedys that no one seems to talk about
I'm talking about the initial jump the seconds hand does one in every 5 or so times you engage the stopwatch, which is due to the movement being a cams chrono vs a vertical clutch/column wheel.
I've known that they do this but was reminded of it this weekend when I went into an Omega boutique and checked out the new 3861 Speedy for the first time, and it did the big skip on my first try of activating the stopwatch. I just don't understand how Nasa certified it with this obvious flaw that makes the timing function so unreliable. I guess it would be fine on a cheap/budget chronograph, although even then it would be debatable how acceptable it is. But on a high-end watch, that a lot of watch geeks claim is the 'greatest chronograph of all time'?? I cringe every time I see some watch youtuber proclaiming that in one of their vids LOL. I just don't get it man. I don't get why Omega hasn't done a modern/updated/evolved version of the original 321 movement, or some other column wheel/vertical clutch type. They had the chance when they decided do an update from the 1861. All the hooplah about this brilliant new 3861 movement, and the stupid thing still skips! LOL. Breitling addressed the issue with their Navitimers and the B01 movement. Wonder why Omega is so slack on it, and how it's acceptable to Nasa! |
20 March 2023, 09:18 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Long Island NY US
Watch: 1675 14060M 16622
Posts: 506
|
Well I have never spoken about it
because it has never happened to me on the 60s and 70s models i have owned including MKII models.
__________________
Rolex, Omega, Panerai, Chopard, Blancpain, Breitling, Seiko, Zenith, IWC, Tag Heuer, Bvlgari, Cartier, Movado, Tissot, Casio and Sinn, a few of my favorite things |
20 March 2023, 10:08 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,244
|
It's not a high-end watch. Its design and construction puts reliability and serviceability above sophistication and precision.
|
20 March 2023, 10:26 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: New York
Posts: 722
|
Great point. Plus, the bottom line is that a watch is for telling the time above all else. My 3861 speedy was +1 seconds per day, if that, which is amazing. I think thats way more important than a stutter on the chrono hand that I never noticed in my time owning it. Plus, timing on a chrono really comes down to the hours/minutes for MOST people. I don’t think a lot of people are utilizing the tacymeter/know how to even use it. Perhaps those people could go for the 321 or another chrono without this problem, assuming they notice it.
|
20 March 2023, 10:50 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,079
|
“ Although it’s generally accepted that a movement with a column-wheel activation system and a vertical clutch is more accurate and sophisticated than one with cams and levers, in practice, this distinction is merely academic. They are different technical approaches to a common goal. That’s the heart of all chronographs: the idea is that they work well, reliably, and repeatedly, no matter how they achieve it. In real life, one approach is just as practical as the other. And therein lies another charm of chronographs.”
“ If the crew of the Apollo 13 were not quibbling about the mechanism that was inside Swigert’s Omega Speedmaster in a life-or-death situation, we should not be splitting hairs either…. Not too much, anyway.” https://revolutionwatch.com/rules-ch...ph-engagement/ |
20 March 2023, 11:20 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Seattle
Watch: 14060M 116610LV
Posts: 267
|
OK fine, but if it's not about precision how does it get a Nasa cert? And btw this new speedy is the first in awhile where the beat rate and millisecond markings match up. How did the previous iteration that had the inaccurate markings pass at Nasa??
|
20 March 2023, 11:21 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Seattle
Watch: 14060M 116610LV
Posts: 267
|
|
20 March 2023, 11:22 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: New York
Posts: 722
|
I don’t think that was the main reason NASA was certifying it back in the 60s
|
20 March 2023, 12:01 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Seattle
Watch: 14060M 116610LV
Posts: 267
|
back in the 60's the speedy had a column wheel/vertical clutch movement, so no skipping. The skipping happened with the cam movements that came later, but the cam movements were approved by Nasa also.
|
20 March 2023, 12:13 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
The chrono worked perfectly well for timing the 14 second Apollo 13 burn, and the 861 watches were used for decades and even currently still I believe part of standard equipment issue by the Russians. The watches are rock solid for what their intended use is in space. |
|
20 March 2023, 12:44 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,064
|
You might want to look up the difference between horizontal (321) and vertical clutch systems...
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
21 March 2023, 03:45 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Seattle
Watch: 14060M 116610LV
Posts: 267
|
it's a good thing the watch didn't skip that one time, or who knows where they may have landed...antarctica? the middle of the amazon? bouncing down the side of a mountain? missing the earth entirely? There was a 1 in 5 chance of a skip happening. Luck was on their side at that particular instance
|
21 March 2023, 07:05 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 759
|
Whenever someone says "certification" or "certified" the real question is what were the requirements in the certification.
If the certification has nothing to do with the chronograph functions, then that might be your answer. Or if there was a chronograph requirement, the certification may have been to be accurate within 1 second per 1 hour of use....or something like that. Anyway, if a cam operated, horizontal clutch, seconds jumping issue causes concern, there are many many models that use this architecture. Also, Richard Mille uses Dubois Depraz chronograph modules there the minute hand apparently jumps, so there's that. |
21 March 2023, 08:50 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Colorado
Watch: your time
Posts: 1,422
|
Almost 20 years on now with my speedy. Never seen what the OP is referring to. Not saying it isn't there, but buy what you like.
|
21 March 2023, 09:06 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,815
|
The suite of tests that NASA applied never addressed the chrono functionality. It was focused on the survivability of the watch as a whole.
I imagine they assumed that asong as the watch was running, the chrono would work. Drilling into the concept of testing the chrono for reliability would be an absolute rabbit hole. It has to be seen against the backdrop that everything these military people were using for the whole of their professional lives was tested and approved through the application of military standards. As Astronaughts they were using various watches from different brands and there was no uniformity or standard applied and they were puting their lives on the line and placing a high degree of trust in each other and the equip.ent they used. The Astronaughts were seeking a degree of uniformity with regard to the watches they were using and drove the approval process. The end result was the Speedy won out in a conclusive manner. It also happened to be the case that a number of the Astronaughts were already preferring the watch and using them personally. After approval, it naturally became standard issue just as it is for every aspect of their profession even down to how a toilet roll is placed on the toilet roll holder. As a result, Omega embraced the opportunity and improved the watch design to better accommodate the needs of Astronaughts in the programs that culminated in Apollo and the moon landings then on to MIR, the ISS and by extention the STS. |
21 March 2023, 09:19 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,815
|
Quote:
After all who has the abilty or necessity to measure such a small time interval or have to factor in any imprecision over a number of seconds(for example 14 of them) or a greater number adding up to minutes or hours? If one needs more precision, then go with digital or a computer. To that, Armstrong's watch was used to replace the LM's clock after it failed. Even if they were using the chrono, it wouldn't have affected the functionality. The watch wouldn't have made any difference to the outcome of that tragic onboard fire during a test in an oxygen enriched environment, nor would it have made any difference to the outcomes of the tragic STS disasters. My point being there are a countless other things to worry about, especially in that pursuit that are incalculable that can have more profound outcomes that don't involve a chrono hand micro jump |
|
25 March 2023, 06:38 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,205
|
|
25 March 2023, 10:51 PM | #18 | |||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,674
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
26 March 2023, 07:28 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,815
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.