5227R or...

[Flex368]

I know this is the PP section of TRF but still I´d like to hear your thoughts as all these pieces are quite different but still in a similar price range. Please explain why you´ve made your choice.

1. Patek 5227R
2. FP Journe Chronometre Souverain with gold dial in either RG or PT
3. Rolex DD40 in either YG, WG or RG

[Rushne]

Oh tough one!

I really do love the 5227R and nearly voted that, but DD 40 WG inched in just a little... I think. My mind flips between those two every second!

[Fat_ninja]

DD40 YG romans champagne dial

[Rwatcher]

Very tough Poll...

When putting across the board a DD40 vs 5227 is hard to choose from, both pro's and con's.

The two stand out being complication differences and waterproof depth ratings.

I have voted 5227R due to it being higher up the list for me personally and is less common & much more understated.

[jd57]

Depends on other items in the collection - for an only watch the DD40 cant be beat due to the water resistance and metal bracelet - can be worn with a suit or with shorts and a polo shirt. If part of a small collection the 5227 is probably the one. In a larger collection would go with the FPJ as something unusual.

[Sonzy]

Originally Posted by jd57

Depends on other items in the collection - for an only watch the DD40 cant be beat due to the water resistance and metal bracelet - can be worn with a suit or with shorts and a polo shirt. If part of a small collection the 5227 is probably the one. In a larger collection would go with the FPJ as something unusual.

I really like what your opinion, it solved many of my confusions.

[Rushne]

Originally Posted by jd57

Depends on other items in the collection - for an only watch the DD40 cant be beat due to the water resistance and metal bracelet - can be worn with a suit or with shorts and a polo shirt. If part of a small collection the 5227 is probably the one. In a larger collection would go with the FPJ as something unusual.

Spot on!

[ap1]

Dd for its comfort and durability. Wg olive or blue

[toucan]

Tough one as I owned a 5227 and a DD. Both are gone.
However, I don’t miss the DD and looking forward to Basel for maybe a new Calatrava.
To have one as an only, I do agree with the DD as the choice , a lot
more versatile but please only buy a DD if you can get the fit of the bracelet spot on.
It’s a heavy watch , if it
moves around or is too tight there is no adjustability.

[jon_jon]

If you want a classic dress watch, get the 5227. Simple elegance is what Calatravas are known for. I have never been a fan of the DD, unless it is platinum as I feel it is just too common, like a Sub or DJ. But if you regularly surround yourself with others who wear a DD, getting a DD(40) would be a good option. Get the FPJ if you want something different that you won't see on other people's wrist.

[Flex368]

Thanks for the replies so far.

Other watches in my collection are: SubC 116610LN, YG SubC 116618LB, PP 5167A on strap, blue 5711/1A and vintage YG Omega Seamaster on strap.

All three watches have their very own pros and cons:

DD40

Pros:

• A real classic in YG with champagne dial
• Very nice and subtle in WG
• Depth rating
• Low cost to service and 5 years warranty
• Full PM President bracelet

Cons:

• No micro adjustment of President bracelet

5227R

Pros:

• Beautiful case design with hunter case back
• Ivory dial and RG case make a perfect combination

Cons:

• Depth rating
• Third 324SC watch in my collection
• Quite expensive for a simple three handed watch

FP Journe CS

Pros:

• Great case design and awesome gold dial
• Platinum case
• Beautiful RG movement
• Rare view in the wild

Cons:

• Depth rating
• Higher service pricing
• No AD nearby

[kneedeep]

The cons totally kill it for the 5227 IMO. I voted DD40 and would probably do WG to tone the bling down a bit.

[G M Francis]

Had the DD40 in WG and sold it as I didn’t wear it that much. It’s a bit of a statement piece to say the least. I bought a 5227 in and loved it apart from the fact you have to angle the watch occasionally to reflect the light off the hands. Also in a low light environment like a bar / restaurant it’s very hard to see the actual time. Seriously thinking about moving the 5227 and getting a DD40 back with a white dial and the Roman numerals. That is a really lovely piece.

[Flex368]

I´m quite surprised that the Journe doesn´t get more love on here.

Originally Posted by kneedeep

The cons totally kill it for the 5227 IMO. I voted DD40 and would probably do WG to tone the bling down a bit.

Yes, there are quite a few cons speaking against the 5227 but it´s like one of these girls you´d still like to date even you know she means lots of trouble.

Originally Posted by G M Francis

Had the DD40 in WG and sold it as I didn’t wear it that much. It’s a bit of a statement piece to say the least.

About the DD40 being a statement piece I´m not worried too much as I wear a YG Sub frequently.

[cascavel]

After seeing what else you own I think the Journe is the best choice. It's a small production independent brand that you don't own and is a beautiful watch. It adds depth to your collection and provides a change of scenery.
If this was a "one watch" choice I would the prefer the DD40.

[1William]

All three are very nice watches but I would go with the DD. It is more wearable day to day and you can pick several different dial configurations.

[Flex368]

As much as I like the two others I also have a feeling that the DD will be more suitable for an active lifestyle being the most robust with a metal bracelet and depth rating.

I still think a DD should be YG which brings me to the point that I don´t like the current dial options for YG. It´d be down to black motif or champagne stick for me. WG I could go for black, black diamond or olive roman.

Tough choice...