ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

submariner16610 · 21 February 2010, 04:43 AM

guys which gmt do you like more?which looks better?Don't just think about the movements. just the looks..

HL65 · 21 February 2010, 04:52 AM

I like the 320 myself--more vintage look.

zlin08033 · 21 February 2010, 04:59 AM

I like 320 more, but it costs more too

johannsmit · 21 February 2010, 05:08 AM

For me, definitely the 320. Love the 1950's case and prefer the cleaner dial. Not so crazy about the silver disc on the 88 (like the 297 more) but I do like the sub-hands on the 88. I guess it is just a little busy for my liking

B. Doggy · 21 February 2010, 05:29 AM

320 imho!

NavitimerNut · 21 February 2010, 05:30 AM

My vote goes to the 320

A1000 · 21 February 2010, 05:42 AM

Persoanally the 310 as it has a simpler face.

mfer · 21 February 2010, 07:18 AM

Well, I don't get the 12 hour GMT's. I like 24 hours GMT's.

But, that said. I like the 320 more!

jcatral14 · 21 February 2010, 08:00 AM

88 and not just because I have one. I like it for the 24H GMT and I love the layout

The 320 is a gorgeous watch as well. Comes down to what you like

timepieceaddict · 21 February 2010, 09:03 AM

320 all the way!!!

ghormley · 21 February 2010, 09:56 AM

320!

dalip · 21 February 2010, 10:00 AM

88

Psmith · 21 February 2010, 11:26 AM

320 by a mile ...several miles in fact

Cheers

m_reign · 22 February 2010, 11:47 AM

320!

nc42acc · 22 February 2010, 11:48 AM

88 All the way!!!

mrh1797 · 22 February 2010, 11:50 AM

three twenty twen twen!!

agungg · 22 February 2010, 01:25 PM

I had the same choices when I got my Panerai. I wanted 88 first but after trying both of them I agree with a lot of people. 320 has a cleaner look and more vintage, that's why I got 320. But 88 is very popular as well.

Carlo Miguel · 22 February 2010, 02:42 PM

320!!! 1950's case!!!

sushisummo · 22 February 2010, 05:13 PM

320.........how about 321.

ral · 22 February 2010, 05:17 PM

Looks wise, I like the cleaner PAM00320. But as mentioned here... I am turned off by the 12-hour GMT hand (there should have been a day-night indicator to go with that)... so among these too I would go with the PAM00088.

mike · 22 February 2010, 11:19 PM

From a functional standpoint the 88 wins. However a 320 is on my radar.

pinoys4 · 23 February 2010, 01:00 AM

320

but i'm biased cause i love mine

Dsaltydog · 23 February 2010, 11:09 AM

Submariner:

I was alike you have a plenty of the Subs. Decided to go PAM..............88 all the way!

Nica64 · 23 February 2010, 11:21 AM

tres veinte!! 320

but I love the 88 too

cars4life · 23 February 2010, 11:35 AM

I just red the thread...Everyone said 320....except 3 or 4 ...

metal man · 23 February 2010, 02:35 PM

and that realy surpised me. No problems with the 320 but I love the 88.

bigmikebee · 23 February 2010, 02:48 PM

320!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Daytonaboy1977 · 25 February 2010, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ral

Looks wise, I like the cleaner PAM00320. But as mentioned here... I am turned off by the 12-hour GMT hand (there should have been a day-night indicator to go with that)... so among these too I would go with the PAM00088.

Must say I have had the 88 and traded it for the 312 and after being in close contact with both the 88 edges it slightly for functionality. The 320 is a gorgeous reference but the 12 hour GMT is a stumbling block.

Trurolexer · 25 February 2010, 10:10 PM

320 for me.

submariner16610 · 27 February 2010, 02:19 PM

finctionality pam 88 coz of the 24 hr gmt? How about looks?

21 February 2010, 04:43 AM	#1
submariner16610 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: united states Watch: submariner,daytona Posts: 707	pam 88 or pam 320? guys which gmt do you like more?which looks better?Don't just think about the movements. just the looks..

21 February 2010, 04:52 AM	#2
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,414	I like the 320 myself--more vintage look. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

21 February 2010, 05:29 AM	#5
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	320 imho! __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

21 February 2010, 05:42 AM	#7
A1000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Adrian Location: UK Posts: 953	Persoanally the 310 as it has a simpler face. __________________ Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009)

21 February 2010, 07:18 AM	#8
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,723	Well, I don't get the 12 hour GMT's. I like 24 hours GMT's. But, that said. I like the 320 more! __________________ member#3242

21 February 2010, 04:59 AM	#3
zlin08033 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: PA Posts: 1,033	I like 320 more, but it costs more too

21 February 2010, 05:08 AM	#4
johannsmit Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Utah, USA Posts: 49	For me, definitely the 320. Love the 1950's case and prefer the cleaner dial. Not so crazy about the silver disc on the 88 (like the 297 more) but I do like the sub-hands on the 88. I guess it is just a little busy for my liking

21 February 2010, 05:30 AM	#6
NavitimerNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Caleb Location: California Watch: Rolex 1500 Posts: 1,295	My vote goes to the 320

21 February 2010, 08:00 AM	#9
jcatral14 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Jay Location: NJ Watch: aholic Posts: 722	88 and not just because I have one. I like it for the 24H GMT and I love the layout The 320 is a gorgeous watch as well. Comes down to what you like __________________ -Jay

21 February 2010, 09:03 AM	#10
timepieceaddict "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Nick Location: Sussex, UK Watch: 116520, Pam 312 Posts: 286	320 all the way!!!

21 February 2010, 09:56 AM	#11
ghormley "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: TEXAS Watch: AP/Rolex Posts: 222	320!

21 February 2010, 10:00 AM	#12
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	88 __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

21 February 2010, 11:26 AM	#13
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	320 by a mile ...several miles in fact Cheers __________________

22 February 2010, 11:47 AM	#14
m_reign "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: SoCal Posts: 860	320!

22 February 2010, 11:48 AM	#15
nc42acc "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Marty Location: North Carolina Watch: out!!!!! Posts: 502	88 All the way!!!

22 February 2010, 11:50 AM	#16
mrh1797 Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Matt Location: The 505 Watch: Love em' all!! Posts: 1,237	three twenty twen twen!!

22 February 2010, 01:25 PM	#17
agungg "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Richardson Posts: 94	I had the same choices when I got my Panerai. I wanted 88 first but after trying both of them I agree with a lot of people. 320 has a cleaner look and more vintage, that's why I got 320. But 88 is very popular as well.

22 February 2010, 02:42 PM	#18
Carlo Miguel Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Carlo Location: Philippines Watch: Rolex Daytona Posts: 444	320!!! 1950's case!!!

22 February 2010, 05:13 PM	#19
sushisummo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: JT Location: in a house....:) Watch: Hmmm......? Posts: 1,776	320.........how about 321. __________________ Collections: -- R-O-L-E-X --AP-ROO -- P-A-N-E-R-A-I -- B-R-E-G-U-E-T -- I-W-C -- B-A-L-L -- O-T-H-E-R-S WISHLIST: Too many to list...... Member #23367

22 February 2010, 05:17 PM	#20
ral Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Philippines Posts: 650	Looks wise, I like the cleaner PAM00320. But as mentioned here... I am turned off by the 12-hour GMT hand (there should have been a day-night indicator to go with that)... so among these too I would go with the PAM00088.

22 February 2010, 11:19 PM	#21
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	From a functional standpoint the 88 wins. However a 320 is on my radar.

23 February 2010, 01:00 AM	#22
pinoys4 Banned Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: san francisco Posts: 39	320 but i'm biased cause i love mine

23 February 2010, 11:09 AM	#23
Dsaltydog "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: David Location: Miami Beach Watch: Vintage Rolex Posts: 327	Submariner: I was alike you have a plenty of the Subs. Decided to go PAM..............88 all the way! __________________ David 16610,16610LV,16613Serti,16622,116520, PAM 088, 1680, 1675,AP ROO AlighaniPolaris,Tudor 9411 ,1665,6536-1,5513,1655,PAM 425 SLC;BLNR,116655

23 February 2010, 11:21 AM	#24
Nica64 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,596	tres veinte!! 320 but I love the 88 too __________________ ______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.

23 February 2010, 11:35 AM	#25
cars4life Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: USA Watch: GMT IIc Posts: 132	I just red the thread...Everyone said 320....except 3 or 4 ...

23 February 2010, 02:35 PM	#26
metal man Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: red Location: Katy Texas Watch: s/s sub 5513 Posts: 172	and that realy surpised me. No problems with the 320 but I love the 88.

23 February 2010, 02:48 PM	#27
bigmikebee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: USA Posts: 359	320!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

25 February 2010, 10:10 PM	#29
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	320 for me.

27 February 2010, 02:19 PM	#30
submariner16610 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: united states Watch: submariner,daytona Posts: 707	finctionality pam 88 coz of the 24 hr gmt? How about looks?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)