ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 March 2018, 03:03 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Marc
Location: NJ
Watch: AP,LV,SD43,PAMs
Posts: 716
|
SD43 vs. New Black 44mm Deep Sea
Seems that the new 2018 non blue "Deep Sea" Cameron watch in all black does not get much attention. Do you guys think this watch will be in demand? In May/June you think these will be attainable at or under the $12,250 price?
My thought is that the new DSSD with the blue face will be in huge demand as it has the wider bracelet and the new 3235 movement. I think the older DSSD will drop in value quite a bit once people start posting these two watches side by side. I have tried on the original DSSD and agree with all the complaints about top heaviness and thin band. The new one with the 70 hour power reserve will be a huge hit for those wanting a large format Rolex. I don't love the blue transition face nor the lime green print and prefer the all black one. And I also don't love the text that says "Original Gas Escape Valve" and "Ring Lock System", but the black version has the same text...so be it. I do like the larger 44mm size watch over the SD43. I am unsure about the satin black face of the SD43 vs the all black 44mm...need to see them side by side. I think I like the date cyclops on the SD43. In terms of the SD43 accessibility, I think these will become readily available in May/June as the red line 50th anniversary text is still in production and many 2017 first movers will want to sell to get the new DSSD. Also, Rolex will be pumping these out at US$11,350 vs the cheaper Sub and Sub date models. thoughts? thanks, Marc |
23 March 2018, 03:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 222
|
If you look at the Rolex site and where the new version of the Deep Sea is presented, they also show the black version with the new movement. To me it looks like the changes are for all Deep Sea, not just the blue dialed version. I'd guess that the old stock for this watch would drop in price, especially the black. So it might be worth waiting to get one and then snag a good deal on a pre-2018.
|
23 March 2018, 03:13 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,638
|
Interesting.
It may have updated lugs and a 1mm wider bracelet, but the Deepsea is still not for everyone (due to is thickness more than anything) Personally I can't see many (if any) SD43 owners selling to buy a new DSSD. Why would they? THe SD43 has had the new movement since launch. Its got the widser bracelet already, and the slimmer lugs. I suspect the SD43 will continue to be more sought after than the DSSD black. The D Blue dial is quite special. Arguably more so than the watch in which it sits. Just my thoughts
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
23 March 2018, 03:19 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
|
Quote:
The DSSD will still be top heavy. It's essentially slightly altered, not all together transformed--more of an evolutionary change than revolutionary. Maybe the slightly wider, and perhaps a little heavier, bracelet and clasp will balance out the case a little better, but I doubt it'll be a significant difference in terms of how it wears. As for appearance, perhaps that's a more significant change with the wider bracelet. But when switching from my DSSD to SubC to GMTC, the differences in lug width, bracelet-to-case proportions, etc, and even weight and balance, are ultimately not a big deal. |
|
23 March 2018, 03:25 AM | #5 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,694
|
Quote:
The only reason I own the Dblue is for the dial. If it were black, I'd simple own the SD43 and call it a day. Obviously I don't have the "new" Dblue but I'm curious to see how it fits, compared to my current MK1. The Sd43 is probably the best Rolex diver IMO ... ok it IS the best Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk |
|
23 March 2018, 03:36 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
|
One feature I haven't seen mentioned much is that Rolex redesigned the DSSD version of the Glidelock. Impressive they didn't just slap the Glidelock on from the SD43 and be done with it. They spent the time and money to develop a new one. The DSSD Glidelock clasp is amazing for those who haven't had a chance to experience.
|
23 March 2018, 03:41 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Marc
Location: NJ
Watch: AP,LV,SD43,PAMs
Posts: 716
|
I was not aware the new Deep Seas had a different better glidelock over the SD43. Can someone elaborate on the differences? Thanks.
|
23 March 2018, 03:43 AM | #8 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,230
|
Quote:
|
|
23 March 2018, 04:05 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,638
|
Quote:
It’s definitely now 22 Neil but I recall a member here (Alpino) confirming from the catalogue that the previous bracelet was actually 21 mm and not 20 mm as we all thought. Could be wrong though Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
23 March 2018, 04:13 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
I would post pics but it's a pain to reduce and post photos, just google it. I prefer the Deepsea's glidelock. |
|
23 March 2018, 04:15 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
Nope, the Deepsea has always had a 21mm lug width. One of the Basel 2018 videos provides the wrong info.
|
23 March 2018, 04:17 AM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,230
|
Quote:
|
|
23 March 2018, 04:20 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Georgia
Watch: All of them
Posts: 569
|
new DSSD & SD43 - 22mm Lugs, tapering to 16.5mm links
vs. old DSSD - 21mm Lugs, tapering to 15.5mm links My impression from the info is the ratcheting glidelock may be gone.
__________________
Current:
Rolex Daytona 116500 | Rolex Submariner 116610 | Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69 Past: Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 | Rolex Submariner 16610 | Rolex Submariner 1680 |
23 March 2018, 04:21 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,638
|
Quote:
No, it’s still there Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
23 March 2018, 04:22 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 934
|
The SD43 is so close to perfect, I can't see many owners of the watch flipping it for a new DSSD which is thicker and a 1MM larger case......what would be the point?? Its certainly not a better watch......merely bigger and thicker. I would though, pick up the original DSSD, at a reduced pre-owned price, if the drop is significant enough.
|
23 March 2018, 04:24 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
|
23 March 2018, 04:29 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Dubai/Wales
Watch: Panerai, Rolex
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
|
|
23 March 2018, 04:33 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Georgia
Watch: All of them
Posts: 569
|
I see it now:
__________________
Current:
Rolex Daytona 116500 | Rolex Submariner 116610 | Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69 Past: Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 | Rolex Submariner 16610 | Rolex Submariner 1680 |
23 March 2018, 04:51 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK Bristol
Watch: DSSD SD43 Mk1 50TH
Posts: 1,247
|
Youll have to grow your nails to use it ! i much prefer my glidlock on the sub & SD, i end up taking the deepsea off to adjust and wonder about all the pivot points that could go wrong and the simple sub/SD glidlock is almost idiot proof .......Almost
|
23 March 2018, 05:07 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
As many have said, the DeepSea is not for everyone mainly do to it's size...
But there are those who love the watch... I have a Black dial DeepSea that I wear all day every day (in fact it's now the only watch I own) and could not be happier... All of the negatives that have been associated with this watch, narrow bracelet, too wide, too thick, to heavy, etc etc etc...I find simply not to be true... This of course is only my opinion, but I find the watch to be not only beautiful to look at, but a pleasure to wear... As comfortable as any Rolex I have had over the last 40 years... And keep in mind that most people who do not like the watch, have never worn it for any length of time... As for the NEW Sea Dweller, I think it's apples and oranges...Plenty of room in a collection for both... |
23 March 2018, 05:14 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: SD43
Posts: 312
|
I recently picked up an SD43 and love the way it wears. The new DSSD is definitely more balanced in appearance and wearability than the previous models imo, but I would not pick it over the 43.
If funds permitted I wouldn’t mind having both, but since I have to pick I choose the SD43. |
23 March 2018, 05:18 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Washinton D.C.
Posts: 614
|
I was diving to retrieve a gold bar that fell out of a ship. I got all the way down to the bottom wearing my SD50 and I couldn't grab it because it was 4001ft down. It was just a foot away. I had to come back up and leave. Had I had the DeepSea I would be rich.
|
23 March 2018, 05:20 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
|
This remains my biggest disappointment and an omission from the SD43. I was really hoping Rolex would include the DSSD edition of the Glidelock at its new, increased price point. I've grown to like the cyclops a lot actually, but was not an initial fan. It looks great with the matte black dial.
It must be an expensive addition at the depth rating. The addition of the DSSD Glidelock on the SD43, would've perhaps crushed the rest of the Diver line, so I could see the reason for the omission. |
23 March 2018, 05:23 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Marc
Location: NJ
Watch: AP,LV,SD43,PAMs
Posts: 716
|
great comments and information. Thanks to all for replying....like the gold bar comment...funny!
|
23 March 2018, 05:23 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
|
You should've reached down with your non watch hand while, holding your watch hand up towards the surface. Would've gave you and additional 4 or 5 feet of reach to 4,005 or 4,006 feet with your SD43
|
23 March 2018, 05:24 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
|
|
23 March 2018, 05:24 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Washinton D.C.
Posts: 614
|
|
23 March 2018, 05:26 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,694
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.