The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 April 2021, 10:16 PM   #211
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,265
Any news about the six-month-old 9010 'Evolution' non-hacking(!) movement no one knows details about?
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 01:38 AM   #212
CanPam
"TRF" Member
 
CanPam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 652
Again? Obviously there are some people who know the details but until Panerai makes a public statement it's "confidential", you can accept it or not buddy...
__________________
CanPam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 04:34 AM   #213
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,612
Changing the 9010 seems really weird.

When I got a 682, I only wanted the original version with a display back.



I thought it was really weird that they only had the 682 display back version for 1 year, then solid back for another year, then switched to a different movement for the 973. That's a really quick transition for essentially the same watch (42mm Submersible, all steel).

And that new movement seems to be called both the P.900 on the website for the 973, but OP XXXIV for the 974?

973
"Automatic mechanical, P.900 calibre, 12 ½ lignes, 4.2 mm thick, 23 jewels, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, one barrel. 171 components"

974
"Automatic mechanical, OP XXXIV calibre, 12 ½ lignes, 4.2 mm thick, 23 jewels, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, one barrel. 171 components"

For comparison, for the 1305
"Automatic mechanical, P.9010 calibre, executed entirely by Panerai, 13¾ lignes, 6.0 mm thick, 31 jewels, Glucydur® balance, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, two barrels. 200 components."

What is the OP XXXIV/P.900?
An ETA movement?

With the prices Panerai is charging (MSRP for 973 is the same as for the 682 when I purchased that), going to the 900/XXXIV is disappointing.
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 04:36 AM   #214
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by eonflux View Post
Changing the 9010 seems really weird.

When I got a 682, I only wanted the original version with a display back.



I thought it was really weird that they only had the 682 display back version for 1 year, then solid back for another year, then switched to a different movement for the 973. That's a really quick transition for essentially the same watch (42mm Submersible, all steel).

And that new movement seems to be called both the P.900 on the website for the 973, but OP XXXIV for the 974?

973
"Automatic mechanical, P.900 calibre, 12 ½ lignes, 4.2 mm thick, 23 jewels, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, one barrel. 171 components"

974
"Automatic mechanical, OP XXXIV calibre, 12 ½ lignes, 4.2 mm thick, 23 jewels, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, one barrel. 171 components"

For comparison, for the 1305
"Automatic mechanical, P.9010 calibre, executed entirely by Panerai, 13¾ lignes, 6.0 mm thick, 31 jewels, Glucydur® balance, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, two barrels. 200 components."

What is the OP XXXIV/P.900?
An ETA movement?

With the prices Panerai is charging (MSRP for 973 is the same as for the 682 when I purchased that), going to the 900/XXXIV is disappointing.
Just found online that the XXXIV/P.900 is a ValFleurier movement.
Regardless of ETA vs VF, should have kept the P.9010 in all the Subs if the prices are going to be close.
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 04:52 AM   #215
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by eonflux View Post
Changing the 9010 seems really weird.

When I got a 682, I only wanted the original version with a display back.

Love the 9010, and the 9011 rocks in my 01033 GMT. Zero reset seconds is epic!
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 05:00 AM   #216
tedo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA
Posts: 460
Have hacking 9010 in my newly purchased PAM1056
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 14757987-331C-45C3-861A-BB32575F5740.jpeg (85.4 KB, 629 views)
tedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 06:57 AM   #217
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by enjoythemusic View Post
Love the 9010, and the 9011 rocks in my 01033 GMT. Zero reset seconds is epic!
Yeah, the zero reset feature is awesome
Love it in my 317
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2021, 04:03 AM   #218
tedo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobradriver View Post
I went to the details for the 9000 movement, and changed the 9000 to 9010 in the URL and found the page. This has a brief description and pic up top, the video below, and more description below that (which removed indication of hacking seconds).

I need a few more posts before I can post a link, so sorry I can't post the link, but just go to their automatic movements page, select the 9000 and then modify the URL as I mentioned above.

Also, google search for 9010 (specifying Panerai's web site) also finds the info page, but for other countries outside US, so I think they are just in the middle of updating things.

BTW, the video on the 9010 page (scroll down) is very cool, although at the 0:44 second mark it shows the hack mechanism stop the movement, and the movement appears to have the usual brushed finish. Hopefully they'll update that to remove the hack section and show the new finish.
https://www.panerai.com/us/en/know-h...ts/p-9010.html
__________________
Both past and present … Santos de Cartier • Hublot BB • Panerai Luminor • Patek Calatrava • AP Royal Oak • Omega • Hermès • Breitling • Rolex • IWC Schaffhausen • TAG Heuer • Doxa
tedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2021, 08:42 AM   #219
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,265
Thx, yet believe that is the original with hacking seconds. Someone posted a while back the movement decoration is different on the 'Evolution' version. Maybe PAM backtracked and is sticking with the hacking version now? I'll know more once my 1118 Tron arrives. We'll crack that baby open and look.
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2021, 06:09 AM   #220
vinny84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Vince
Location: PA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 671
Bringing this thread back up, has anyone opened a new 1312 with the solid case back to compare movements from the last gen P9010?

I would like to add a 1312 possibly next year but after some digging, I'm getting mixed feelings about this company, the way they label their movements as in-house which in reality are basically ETAs or how they quietly change them with no warnings etc. Thanks
vinny84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2021, 07:54 AM   #221
Saoirse32
2024 Pledge Member
 
Saoirse32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinny84 View Post
Bringing this thread back up, has anyone opened a new 1312 with the solid case back to compare movements from the last gen P9010?

I would like to add a 1312 possibly next year but after some digging, I'm getting mixed feelings about this company, the way they label their movements as in-house which in reality are basically ETAs or how they quietly change them with no warnings etc. Thanks

I have the 1118 and have NOT opened it.
What I can report is that it's deadly accurate, last month running +1/day.

Yes, the non hacking was only a minor annoyance at first, but then I figured out the back pressure "work around."

I will say that all this stuff bothered me a bit at first, but I got over it quickly since I believe all of these companies run a little loose when it comes to history, movements, etc.; however, Panerai is just so unique and robust and their case materials so cool, that I simply enjoy wearing them more than my other brands.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
PANERAI Luminor 8 Days GMT “Dot” Dial (PAM00233)
PANERAI Submersible (PAM01055)
PANERAI Radiomir (PAM01385)
ROLEX Sea-Dweller Mk1 (126600)
ROLEX DeepSea D-Blue (136660)
OMEGA Speedmaster “Silver Snoopy Award” (310.32.42.50.02.001)
OMEGA Seamaster Diver 300M 75th Anniversary (210.30.42.20.03.003)
IWC Chronograph Top Gun Edition “Woodland” (IW389106)
Saoirse32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2021, 01:22 PM   #222
vinny84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Vince
Location: PA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saoirse32 View Post
I have the 1118 and have NOT opened it.
What I can report is that it's deadly accurate, last month running +1/day.

Yes, the non hacking was only a minor annoyance at first, but then I figured out the back pressure "work around."

I will say that all this stuff bothered me a bit at first, but I got over it quickly since I believe all of these companies run a little loose when it comes to history, movements, etc.; however, Panerai is just so unique and robust and their case materials so cool, that I simply enjoy wearing them more than my other brands.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, the hacking feature is whatever at this point. Would be a nice feature but it's not a deal breaker for me. I guess what I'm asking is if Panerai actually secretly changed the P9010 to an ETA movement and just calling it their in-house movement?

This is exactly what happened with their chrono, they said it was their in house movement, then later they said it was ETA based. I have a problem with a company if they're not going to be up front with their products. If that's the case then I'll look elsewhere or just try to find one prior to June 2020, but would like to buy new from an AD
vinny84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2021, 11:13 PM   #223
paneristinewb
2024 Pledge Member
 
paneristinewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saoirse32 View Post
I have the 1118 and have NOT opened it.
What I can report is that it's deadly accurate, last month running +1/day.

Yes, the non hacking was only a minor annoyance at first, but then I figured out the back pressure "work around."

I will say that all this stuff bothered me a bit at first, but I got over it quickly since I believe all of these companies run a little loose when it comes to history, movements, etc.; however, Panerai is just so unique and robust and their case materials so cool, that I simply enjoy wearing them more than my other brands.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Being the original poster on this thread, I can say that I fully agree with this Post. I was super annoyed that the second didn’t hack, but over time started to forget about that and enjoy the watch for its actual beauty. The moment itself is a gem, robust and accurate as hell.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
paneristinewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2021, 11:14 PM   #224
paneristinewb
2024 Pledge Member
 
paneristinewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinny84 View Post
Yes, the hacking feature is whatever at this point. Would be a nice feature but it's not a deal breaker for me. I guess what I'm asking is if Panerai actually secretly changed the P9010 to an ETA movement and just calling it their in-house movement?

This is exactly what happened with their chrono, they said it was their in house movement, then later they said it was ETA based. I have a problem with a company if they're not going to be up front with their products. If that's the case then I'll look elsewhere or just try to find one prior to June 2020, but would like to buy new from an AD

No, it’s truly in-house. I don’t think they’d do anything that disingenuous to swap it out for an ETA and not tell anyone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
paneristinewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2022, 03:27 AM   #225
mdrums
"TRF" Member
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 44
I am looking at purchasing this Monday a 1305 Luminor Sub Titanium or the 1389 Laminar Sub Titanium with Ceramic Bezel.

According to Panerai's website they both use the P9010. What happened to the second hand when you pull the crown out to set the time? Does it just stop were you pull the crown out like every one of my other watches or does it got to 12 o'clock like my PAM 1321 Laminar GMT Power Reserve I bought in 2018.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg F0DC59CA-CCAF-425C-858E-4E5EB793DE92.jpg (254.5 KB, 429 views)
File Type: jpeg IMG_1950.jpeg (129.6 KB, 429 views)
File Type: jpeg IMG_1951.jpeg (226.1 KB, 424 views)
mdrums is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2022, 06:29 AM   #226
The OG Beef
"TRF" Member
 
The OG Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdrums View Post
I am looking at purchasing this Monday a 1305 Luminor Sub Titanium or the 1389 Laminar Sub Titanium with Ceramic Bezel.

According to Panerai's website they both use the P9010. What happened to the second hand when you pull the crown out to set the time? Does it just stop were you pull the crown out like every one of my other watches or does it got to 12 o'clock like my PAM 1321 Laminar GMT Power Reserve I bought in 2018.

If it’s a hacking version of the 9010, the seconds hand stops wherever it is when you pull out the crown. It’s not a zero reset complication.


all_in_the_pamily on IG
The OG Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2022, 10:27 AM   #227
mdrums
"TRF" Member
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by The OG Beef View Post
If it’s a hacking version of the 9010, the seconds hand stops wherever it is when you pull out the crown. It’s not a zero reset complication.


all_in_the_pamily on IG
Thanks... well I went over to the mall and the dealer was open and I caved in and picked out the 1305. I will see if the non-hacking seconds hand bothers me. I came close very close to getting the Submersible Militari with that cool dial...but at $19.5K I could not justify it and would actually rather of had a $16k IWC or wait and spend another 8k for a AP ROO Vampire I have my eye on.

I still wonder why Panerai would get rid of a basic function like this...odd.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1966.JPG (276.3 KB, 409 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1962.JPG (133.2 KB, 414 views)
File Type: png IMG_0710.PNG (134.0 KB, 409 views)
mdrums is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2022, 10:54 AM   #228
The OG Beef
"TRF" Member
 
The OG Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 368
1305 is great - love mine. If you feel the need to set it precisely you can use a bit of back pressure on the crown to hold the seconds hand for syncing.

As for the deletion of the feature, I’d guess it has everything to do with Panerai’s 8 year warranty. A hacking function isn’t exactly subtle and must promote wear and tear. It’s a bit like jamming a rod in a moving bicycle wheel.


all_in_the_pamily on IG
The OG Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2022, 09:24 AM   #229
dieselophile
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Richmond, KY
Watch: SS Sub, PAM 111
Posts: 67
If movement has been updated, or in this case downgraded by a loss function, or simply changed in anyway - functional or structural, the manufacturer surely ought not be using the same caliber number to designate it anymore. If its a closely derived movement - it ought be renamed a P9010.1 or something close to the original, but still different to distinguish it from the unchanged one. Any specific movement's designated number ought to be unique and reflective of its standard features. They just can't call it a P9010 anymore if it doesn't have the hacking feature.
dieselophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2022, 05:30 AM   #230
roger.bolton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
Its the Panerai way.

We suffer it or we choose another brand.
roger.bolton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2022, 10:12 AM   #231
dieselophile
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Richmond, KY
Watch: SS Sub, PAM 111
Posts: 67
How and what they do may not be "right", and its OK to speak up..... but LOL.. it doesn't diminish my affection for my Panerai.....absolutely love my Pam 111.
dieselophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2022, 02:24 AM   #232
roger.bolton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
So does any Panerai now have a display case back with the revised p9010 movement?
roger.bolton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2022, 03:27 AM   #233
paneristinewb
2024 Pledge Member
 
paneristinewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 336
I don’t believe so. They removed most of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
paneristinewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2022, 04:44 AM   #234
roger.bolton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
paneristinewb, its that then makes me think its a downgrade, based on the changes to decoration. Cheapen the movement and hide it by stopping display case backs.

Does anyone have any photos of what the new movement looks like real world?
roger.bolton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2022, 10:53 AM   #235
rmwill
2024 Pledge Member
 
rmwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 880
Shenanigans like this is why I picked my non hacking eta/Unitas 111. 300m water resistance. Display case back. +6 seconds a day. Less is more.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600
Rolex Explorer 224270
Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar
Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich
Panerai PAM00111

2 Factor Authentication
rmwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2022, 12:24 PM   #236
paneristinewb
2024 Pledge Member
 
paneristinewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger.bolton View Post
paneristinewb, its that then makes me think its a downgrade, based on the changes to decoration. Cheapen the movement and hide it by stopping display case backs.

Does anyone have any photos of what the new movement looks like real world?

Very well could be. To be honest, Panerai movements aren’t really known for their good looks. I had a 312 with display case back (P.9000 movement) and really the movement was extremely plain. The rotor took up so much space that there wasn’t any mechanicals to see. The newer version does show a bit more, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there isn’t stellar finishing. But man, that thing is reliable and accurate - really what matters in the end.

Take Rolex for example, no models with display case back - and even if they did, the movement is very simple looking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
paneristinewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2022, 08:21 PM   #237
azcii
"TRF" Member
 
azcii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 73
Would be really interesting to see pictures of the new gen2 P.9010.
azcii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2022, 05:48 AM   #238
roger.bolton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
The question is why no pictures?
roger.bolton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2022, 08:14 AM   #239
The OG Beef
"TRF" Member
 
The OG Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 368
I’d pop the back of my 1305 if it wasn’t under warranty.


all_in_the_pamily on IG
The OG Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2022, 06:03 AM   #240
azcii
"TRF" Member
 
azcii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 73
Ok, so I just found out this

The old 1312 (with hacking) had a 15.5mm thick case.

The newer 1118 and 1662 (no hacking) are both 14.2-14.5mm thick.

Could the removal of the hacking mechanism have made the movement thinner hence enabling a thinner case? Or is this difference a result of removing the glass back?
azcii is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.