ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 April 2006, 04:53 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
Datejust Dweller.
The first Easter Bunny was really a bird, that is why eggs and bunnies are associated with Easter.
My current Seadweller is an older model and if I don't wear it for awhile, I must manually turn the hour hand 24 hours for one day on the SD calendar. So.... I just wear it now with whatever date is on hand. Too much trouble to wind it, and probably not good for the watch. I will not support a winder. Do the newer SDs come with a quick datejust function? Are they all now datejust? If So... When did that function come as standard? |
17 April 2006, 04:57 AM | #2 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
Yes, the current SDs are all equipped with the "Rapid Date" function. Not sure when this was introduced, but I know a way you can get around your problem of the non-quick set function. Unscrew the crown and go past the witchin' hour so the date changes. Then take the minute hand back to around 11 pm and go forward again past midnight and see if the date changes. Repeat this procedure till you've reached the desired date. BTW, winding the crown whenever you find the watch stopped, is not going to harm the movement in anyway whatsoever. Try the above and let me know the result. I am curious to know if it worked. Thanks - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
17 April 2006, 06:36 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
JJ says:
"Unscrew the crown and go past the witchin' hour so the date changes. Then take the minute hand back to around 11 pm and go forward again past midnight and see if the date changes. Repeat this procedure till you've reached the desired date." That seems a very logical , mechanical approach to change the date. Also ,...that approach would take a " Myth Busters " experiment for me to wind my Rollie backwards. Anyone have significant experience pedalling backwards on an automatic Rolex? Respectfully, Mrdi |
17 April 2006, 11:45 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Duh!
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: a gonna do?
Posts: 2,573
|
Quote:
|
|
17 April 2006, 04:10 PM | #5 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
When I got married in 1970, I was given a gold OMEGA Geneve Automatic, but without a hacking movement and non-quickset date. Whenever it stopped, I set it the way I've described above and never had a problem. Therefore, I cannot see you having any problem with your SD. Go ahead, p..., make my day!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
17 April 2006, 04:20 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
The best person I can think of to answer that question is Lol-x. Just last Wednesday when we caught up for beers, he was sporting his 1665.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
17 April 2006, 06:19 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,236
|
Well I have a 1665 must be honest always wind the date forward,and never tried the way JJ suggests.Not 100% sure if that will work on a 1665,a wrist watch date wheels etc unless a quick-set are designed to go forward.The quick-set feature came in about 1977,and on the SD from around 1980.As a general practice, its not advisable to turn date hands backward. For many watches with mechanical movements, this is a bad idea for several reasons. First, the mechanisms are usually designed around moving forward, so some cannot take the stress of reversing properly. Second, after a watch settles in, reversing the watch against the pattern of wear may cause unnecessary additional wear. And finally, watches with dates and other complications can be harmed by rolling the time backwards--especially near midnight.
Despite that, many modern watches can be reversed with no problem.The one general rule is that if your second hand does not hack stop, when you put the watch in time setting mode, then you should definitely not turn the hands backwards.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
18 April 2006, 12:51 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
The bag opens further, as we peer inside, the options become more cerebral and complex.
Padi, my recollection is the DRSDs do have a hacking mode? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.