ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 January 2021, 01:06 PM | #151 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 791
|
I reached out to archives@tiffany.com to learn more about this service, and unfortunately it looks like a serial number won't be included on any output. From my exchange with them:
"Please see attached for the necessary paperwork to schedule your Commissioned Research Request for your Rolex. Please note that our Commissioned Research for Watches includes a Certificate of the Research completed, which does not validate the authenticity of the Watch. The Watch Certificate will not include the Serial Number of the watch being researched, but will outline the Watch Title, Model Name, and Reference Number and be accompanied by the Archive’s official seal and signature of our Head Archivist. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to reach back out. Thank you again for your interest in Tiffany & Co.’s history, and have a lovely holiday season. " |
3 January 2021, 01:11 PM | #152 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,603
|
Lol, does not validate authenticity.....it’s not worth the paper it’s printed on then
|
3 January 2021, 01:21 PM | #153 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,057
|
|
3 January 2021, 01:27 PM | #154 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
|
Are you saying you haven't repeatedly claimed Rolex verifies every Tiffany co-brand it services? You have provided proof? What proof have you provided your claim is true?
Any actual collector knows gray dealers have been around about as long as ADs have. It says a lot about your actual experience to make that claim. :) Troll? Are you saying I called you a troll? As with all your other assertions let's see some proof. :) |
3 January 2021, 01:44 PM | #155 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,423
|
Quote:
|
|
3 January 2021, 02:03 PM | #156 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
|
|
3 January 2021, 02:45 PM | #157 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
Why you think they're not including the serial number? Without It's even more dangerous because it could be attached to any watch with the same model and reference... The Phillip Auction certificate came with the serial number written on it, I'm wondering if they already change policy... |
|
3 January 2021, 07:14 PM | #158 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
|
Quote:
I know you keep ducking this because it proves you have no idea what you're talking about but the long time existence of the gray market proves once those watches become property of the AD Rolex no longer has control and has no idea how those watches are sold.. If Rolex could do what you 'believe' there would be no gray market. :) |
|
3 January 2021, 09:00 PM | #159 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
|
Rolex Tiffany Archive Papers
What happens to a watch that is sent to Rolex for service that has had a dial swap? If someone were to say, pick up an authentic dial from a third party (not RSC) and replace it wouldn’t Rolex still service the watch if the dial was both authentic and NOT original to that watch? Or would they kick it back because the dial was swapped out without their “knowledge or consent”?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
4 January 2021, 02:07 AM | #160 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,802
|
Quote:
In terms of Tiffany’s inability to confirm actual authenticity of a watch, that makes total sense. They’d be able to confirm that a vintage Tiffany-branded Rolex was sold by them, but they wouldn’t know what’s happened to the watch in the decades since that time, whether parts/movement etc... were swapped with other parts, for example. Tiffany doesn’t get the watch in hand to inspect. They’d just research whether they once sold it based on serial and reference numbers. Authenticating a Rolex and its parts is a different matter. |
|
4 January 2021, 02:11 AM | #161 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
|
|
4 January 2021, 02:27 AM | #162 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
it's well known Rolex won't service modified or aftermarket parts on their watches. it's fraud/illegal to stamp Tiffany & co if it wasn't done by an authorized retailer. Rolex servicing illegally stamped watches versus changing dials seems pretty logical. Why would this be the only modification they allow people to do to their watch?(other than caseback inscriptions which have been commonplace on watches back to the 1700's from what i've seen) my beliefs would have no effect on the grey market. The grey market has to do with new goods purchased from a retailer, sold at either a discount or in modern times for profit. how Tiffany and Co dispersed their product after arrival to their facilities is irrelevant to this conversation entirely. |
|
4 January 2021, 02:30 AM | #163 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
not sure, but this one's likely authentic, slightly damaged so i imagine they would request replacement if sent in, I don't believe they will service 1603's anymore either, but this theory would be fairly easy to test out if someone felt like blowing a few thousand dollars. |
|
4 January 2021, 02:36 AM | #164 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Unless you have a Rolex warrantee paper that cites your ‘tiffany’ dial, I say it is BS. What stops me from servicing my 1601 with a rsc, then using my nice Bergeron tools, open the back, remove the movement and insert my ‘tiffany’ dial?
Nothing. In fact, that is exactly what has happened routinely. without robust provenance that describes the item exactly, you have absolutely nothing. I think you should enjoy your tiffany dialed watch, but be prepared for a tough sell when you get bored with it. |
4 January 2021, 02:45 AM | #165 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
|
Quote:
|
|
4 January 2021, 03:13 AM | #166 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
I completely agree with you, and as you said I'm ready to a tough sell in case I want to get rid off it, actually my Seadweller is so beautiful and with a nice patina, that often I regret the T stamp on the dial. Having said that, if by any miracle RSC was "hypothetically" able to tell me in writing (I know, impossible...:( that that particular serial number was indeed originally sent to Tiffany, the situation will be different in my eye/opinion. As I said this is all hypothetical because Rolex will never tell me that, even though I believe they have record of what when where, but not where the watch was actually sold because of the AD trading/exchange |
|
4 January 2021, 03:15 AM | #167 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: 33139/95460
Posts: 1,311
|
“The Watch Certificate will not include the Serial Number of the watch being researched”
This from Tiffany is utterly illogical. Without the serial number, all any Tiffany Watch Certificate is saying is “Tiffany sold some Rolex Submariners”? (or Day-Dates, or whatever) Everyone already knows that much, and it requires no research by Tiffany. If they are researching the watch by serial number, why not put that number on their certificate? I can certainly understand their being unwilling to authenticate any particular Tiffany dial *stamp*, but this is just bizarre. |
4 January 2021, 04:31 AM | #168 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
I’m just bitter at the quantity of fake Tudor subs being sold on eBay from japan. Sorry if I appear cranky. I along with Richard create lots ofposts on here just to spread the word of reason ans hope others don’t get ripped off. Seems like there are a few people like 330 who understand their T dial and this is what counts. I just get disgusted at people selling fake junk for big bucks. We can all debate this on a logical or semi intellectual level without much success. I just would like to prevent the little guy from paying an extra $2k for that label if he doesn’t understand how easy it is to create it unscrupulously
|
4 January 2021, 06:42 AM | #169 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 525
|
|
4 January 2021, 08:51 AM | #170 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
|
Quote:
The danger you present is the likelihood of another noob like you believing what you have repeatedly stated and paying a big premium for a Rolex serviced watch with a Tiffany stamped dial that may even have been placed in the watch after the service, no way to tell. It would be hilarious if you got sued every year or so by someone who believed you until he tried to sell his "Rolex approved Tiffany dial" because of your adamant assurances throughout this thread. ;) Good luck. :) |
|
5 December 2021, 07:11 PM | #171 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
My adamant assurances? Mr.Carver, you're delusional. I shared my beliefs, which don't align with yours. However somehow you've believed your BS longer so somehow that makes it more truthful . You haven't shown evidence of 1 known fake Tiffany stamping being serviced by Rolex and are now falling back on some argument that people are swapping dials after being serviced by Rolex which is an entire different issue and has nothing to do with Rolex servicing authentic Tiffany dials or not. Hell id love to see the thread about the dealer stamping watches with Tiffany and selling for a profit. Clearly you're not capable of critical thinking, so I'll leave it at that. But if you think you're out here saving people thousands, you're wrong. I could've made a killing buying and selling Tiffany dials over the past 10 years had I not listened to morons like you 30 years of something not happening in your observation isn't proof btw. From where I'm sitting you hardly seem to be the most observant person. |
|
13 August 2022, 03:24 AM | #172 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA!!
Posts: 69
|
I know this was quite a contentious thread from several months ago, and while it's been a little while, I did discover something that I thought would be worth a belated thread bump.
I'd love your thoughts on this discovery, but it appears that on at least some occasions, RSC goes on the record with stating that a model has a Tiffany dial? (See the below). Granted, there's always the possibility that service documents could have been faked, but given how easy it would be to determine whether or not a watch actually had an RSC service, it feels like unlikely to me that either a dealer or private seller would try that approach? (Or maybe people are less astute than I think they are. ) Link to the C24 listing / full gallery here, for anyone who wants to peruse and provide feedback: https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/rolex...-id5827543.htm |
13 August 2022, 03:31 AM | #173 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,154
|
I would be quite cautious on this one...Love the blurred out photo of the evidence it's Tiffany.
|
13 August 2022, 03:45 AM | #174 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA!!
Posts: 69
|
|
13 August 2022, 04:10 PM | #175 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,090
|
I call bs
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 August 2022, 12:57 PM | #176 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
|
Rolex Tiffany Archive Papers
Rolex maybe able to authenticate the dial but not that the watch was original to Tiffany’s. The paperwork needed would be a warranty that has the serial number and names Tiffany and Co. as the authorized jeweler. I would be cautious and likely pass on this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 August 2022, 03:53 AM | #177 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 54
|
That particular Tiffany font doesn't exist; further, it's a service dial - never seen any with a genuine Tiffany-branding; and finally, the SWISS only tells you it's from the late 90's, while Rolex stopped the partnership with Tiffany somewhen in the first half of the 90's - so, how could it be that Tiffany printed it...
Greetings, Xeramic |
26 August 2022, 06:49 AM | #178 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,113
|
Quote:
So you're saying it's one of a kind
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.