The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 July 2017, 12:40 PM   #1
Foxman2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
15400 just back from AP service - 5711 comparison?

So I just got my 15400 back from AP service for its 3rd year warranty extension. Also had the polish done and the watch looks incredible. Putting it back on my wrist reminded me of what an incredible watch this is.

For those of you that own an 5711 or 5712 PP, is it really worth almost 3X the price for another stainless steel piece?

Or is the RG 44 ROO a better option? Both appear to be around $35k.
Foxman2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 02:18 PM   #2
jem7v
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxman2k View Post
So I just got my 15400 back from AP service for its 3rd year warranty extension. Also had the polish done and the watch looks incredible. Putting it back on my wrist reminded me of what an incredible watch this is.

For those of you that own an 5711 or 5712 PP, is it really worth almost 3X the price for another stainless steel piece?

Or is the RG 44 ROO a better option? Both appear to be around $35k.
Why are you paying 3x the price of 15400 for a 5711? That is a horrible deal.
jem7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 03:05 PM   #3
gummy
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
gummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,300
depends...

If you're comparing 44mm RG to 5711 or 5712 - really depends on what you're after?

Looking to get into Patek? Both 5711 or 5712 are great choices especially coming from AP

Looking to add a great companion to your 15400 - 44mm RG is a fantastic complimentary piece to the 15400.

That would give to two great AP options for almost every occasion
gummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 03:19 PM   #4
singe89
"TRF" Member
 
singe89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,722
Who is paying $35k for a 5711? That's ridiculous. Compare the 5711 to the 15202. Both are harder to get and $22k for the original Genta (AP) vs $24k for the 2nd version (Patek) isn't that big of a deal price wise.

I wouldn't compare the 15400 or 15300 to either of those watches. The 3120 is more modern but easier to produce and they are amazing watches for the price.
singe89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 08:36 PM   #5
Foxman2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
It seems a NIB 5711 sells for around $32k as I've seen on WatchRecon....
Foxman2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 08:51 PM   #6
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxman2k View Post
It seems a NIB 5711 sells for around $32k as I've seen on WatchRecon....
No way i would pay the premium over retail for that vs getting a ROO. If you really want it, i would start developing a relationship with your AD and be patient.

Paperwork is a big deal for me with Patek. Its the only brand i will only buy new and from an AD, as i want the certificate of origin in my name. So paying a premium over retail and the paperwork not in your name would be a non starter for me.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 09:10 PM   #7
metdrdg
"TRF" Member
 
metdrdg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: SSDayt, 5711, 5170
Posts: 195
Love the 5711 but don't spend that much - get on a waitlist and eventually you'll have one for 24K.
metdrdg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 10:01 PM   #8
dmash
"TRF" Member
 
dmash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by metdrdg View Post
Love the 5711 but don't spend that much - get on a waitlist and eventually you'll have one for 24K.
This. If you have other watches and not millions in the bank, just be patient and get on a list. You can find lists with 2 year waiting lists if you look around. 2 years to save $10k is a no brainer IMO.

and yes, that would complement an AP nicely.
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 10:57 PM   #9
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
I personally much prefer the 5712-11 which I have to RO, love it in pics and got a new 15300 blue dial, but after wearing it and playing with it didn't feel special to me, so decided will sell it some day and not wear it, so they're not for me, love my ceramic diver though. Others much prefer RO's, I think only you can tell after trying them, about the price I paid my 5711 20.500 swiss francs, would I have paid the crazy grey prices? No way.
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 11:04 PM   #10
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxman2k View Post
It seems a NIB 5711 sells for around $32k as I've seen on WatchRecon....
They sell for sticker at AD's. As just noted in another thread someone just received one with a minor wait.

5711 or 12 or not worth over sticker at all.

Grab the 44mm ROO and wait for 5711 if that's what you want.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2017, 11:58 PM   #11
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
They sell for sticker at AD's. As just noted in another thread someone just received one with a minor wait.

5711 or 12 or not worth over sticker at all.

Grab the 44mm ROO and wait for 5711 if that's what you want.
Yes, the RG 44 and 5712 or 5711 at retail are the pair I would hold, I'd then sell the 15400 if you have to.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2017, 12:04 AM   #12
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,498
Completely agree. AP does a fantastic job and they come back literally brand new - Enjoy!
red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2017, 12:06 AM   #13
Foxman2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
Also considering the titanium ROO.

Foxman2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2017, 12:45 AM   #14
ufboy73
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
personally, i would grab the Ti. i just recently purchased that watch and its a total winner (like it more than my LE Schumacher i had, actually).

im also wondering about a question on similar lines (if you dont mind minor threadjack lol)...

if assume Ti and 15202 are in the collection, already - would you guys asdd the 'older' RG ROO (while can still get brand new) or the 5711...

i suspect some may say swap the 15202 for the 5711 and then have Ti, RG, 5711?

but i am also wondering if folks would suggest going 15202, 5711 and only one Offshore...

i used to knock the Offshores (oversized, not classic, etc) - all may be true but they really are stunning watches so more open to having more of them in my stash possibly!
ufboy73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2017, 12:49 AM   #15
Foxman2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
The offshores took a while to grow on me, but once I saw them in person and tried them on I loved them! They are most definitely big hefty watches but that's kind of the point.

I must add that the polished on the ceramic is incredible, it's very shiny and looks great.

I think keeping the 15202 is a good move. Part of the appeal for me of the 15400 is the incredible bracelet which you of course lose on the ROO.
Foxman2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2017, 12:49 AM   #16
Foxman2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
And side note, the titanium was virtually indistinguishable from the stainless steel in terms of the look of the metal
Foxman2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2017, 02:39 AM   #17
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by ufboy73 View Post
personally, i would grab the Ti. i just recently purchased that watch and its a total winner (like it more than my LE Schumacher i had, actually).

im also wondering about a question on similar lines (if you dont mind minor threadjack lol)...

if assume Ti and 15202 are in the collection, already - would you guys asdd the 'older' RG ROO (while can still get brand new) or the 5711...

i suspect some may say swap the 15202 for the 5711 and then have Ti, RG, 5711?

but i am also wondering if folks would suggest going 15202, 5711 and only one Offshore...

i used to knock the Offshores (oversized, not classic, etc) - all may be true but they really are stunning watches so more open to having more of them in my stash possibly!
15202, 5711 and RG 44 would be my three.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2017, 03:39 AM   #18
Halothane
2024 Pledge Member
 
Halothane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Anonymous
Location: location location
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,282
The Ti is gorgeous. Saw it in person a week ago.
Halothane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.