The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 January 2018, 06:17 AM   #31
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
Beauty. Congrats and enjoy it
Stevec14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 06:19 AM   #32
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pte6000 View Post
PO all day the GMT is such a special version and perfect size





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That is really nice. Would you mind letting me know the model number/size?
Stevec14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 07:31 AM   #33
Pte6000
2024 Pledge Member
 
Pte6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NC
Watch: GMT & a Jubilee
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec14 View Post
That is really nice. Would you mind letting me know the model number/size?


It’s been discontinued
Still can be found on certain sites
Planet Ocean 43.5 mm GMT

23230442201001 is the model #

Can be found in the $4K range


Pte6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 10:28 AM   #34
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeRookie View Post
I’ve been trying to decide between the same 2 watches. I think the Diver 300 in black will dress up better. The PO is an amazing watch though. I gave mine to my son and I miss it. I’m thinking of replacing it.

PO is superior in every measurable way.
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 11:15 AM   #35
TimeRookie
"TRF" Member
 
TimeRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGESQ View Post
PO is superior in every measurable way.
Good! That’s what I ended up buying and I’m very pleased.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 1C6143BB-12E8-41B0-8C95-00861F87B99C.jpeg (225.2 KB, 271 views)
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present)
116710 GMT Master II BLNR
Seiko Prospex LX SNR031
Pelagos 42mm
Explorer II 226570
TimeRookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 01:23 PM   #36
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
texasmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by paneristinewb View Post
And here it is




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What size is this one?
texasmade is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 01:31 PM   #37
TimeRookie
"TRF" Member
 
TimeRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by texasmade View Post
What size is this one?
43.5mm. The model number will say 44 in it.
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present)
116710 GMT Master II BLNR
Seiko Prospex LX SNR031
Pelagos 42mm
Explorer II 226570
TimeRookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2018, 06:21 AM   #38
Chronokid
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Illinois
Watch: One I'm wearing!
Posts: 274
I've owned vintage Seamaster 300's and I just traded the second Planet Ocean that I've owned (don't ask me why). However, both of the PO's I've owned were XL 45.5mm and the early 2500 series movements. Nothing wrong with them at all and I loved both PO's. I plan on getting another PO in the near future that is slightly smaller and housing the newer 8500 series movement.
Chronokid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2018, 06:40 AM   #39
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
I'd get a first edition PO like the 2201.50 or an early SM 300 with 1120 cal and wave dial. Bernard Watch always has some for sale. Price may not be the best but it's a trusted source.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2020, 01:35 PM   #40
usmc_k9_vet
"TRF" Member
 
usmc_k9_vet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Issaquah
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGESQ View Post
PO is superior in every measurable way.
I hope it is ok to bump an old thread. I am going through this same dilemma now - PO vs Diver 300m. I am very interested in the 43.5mm Planet Ocean with dark blue dial and orange accents, white dial Diver 300m (likely on rubber), or the grey dial Diver 300m on bracelet. Talk about first world problems, but this is a tough choice! I like certain things about each watch. For instance, I like the wave dial on the Diver 300m, but I like that hands on the PO as well as the bezel and it just looks like the overall finish is a bit nicer on the PO. I also like both bracelets, but it looks like the PO has a nice taper whereas the Diver 300m is just one diameter all the way around.

I really need to try them on again, but that is currently difficult to do as boutiques and ADs are still closed.

Thoughts? Why, as quoted above, is the "PO superior in every measurable way"?
usmc_k9_vet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2020, 02:00 PM   #41
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
texasmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by usmc_k9_vet View Post
I hope it is ok to bump an old thread. I am going through this same dilemma now - PO vs Diver 300m. I am very interested in the 43.5mm Planet Ocean with dark blue dial and orange accents, white dial Diver 300m (likely on rubber), or the grey dial Diver 300m on bracelet. Talk about first world problems, but this is a tough choice! I like certain things about each watch. For instance, I like the wave dial on the Diver 300m, but I like that hands on the PO as well as the bezel and it just looks like the overall finish is a bit nicer on the PO. I also like both bracelets, but it looks like the PO has a nice taper whereas the Diver 300m is just one diameter all the way around.

I really need to try them on again, but that is currently difficult to do as boutiques and ADs are still closed.

Thoughts? Why, as quoted above, is the "PO superior in every measurable way"?
The 43.5mm PO's were unwearable on my wrist. They're pretty thick so if you wear tight dress cuffs you'll want to keep that in mind.
texasmade is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2020, 12:19 AM   #42
anonymousmoose
"TRF" Member
 
anonymousmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 601
Seamaster Planet Ocean vs 300m Diver

Quote:
Originally Posted by usmc_k9_vet View Post

Thoughts? Why, as quoted above, is the "PO superior in every measurable way"?



Quote:
Originally Posted by texasmade View Post
The 43.5mm PO's were unwearable on my wrist. They're pretty thick so if you wear tight dress cuffs you'll want to keep that in mind.

Opposite for me. I thought it would be unwearable from the written specifications, but when I tried it on it fitted like other 42mm watches.





Saying that; the SMP is more versatile because it's thinner. Makes a better watch to wear with dress shirts etc (if someone care about that).




End of the day, the PO is probably the best [subjectively] looking diver on the market. So it's a tough choice really.
__________________
anonymousmoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.