ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 January 2018, 06:17 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
|
Beauty. Congrats and enjoy it
|
22 January 2018, 06:19 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
|
|
22 January 2018, 07:31 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NC
Watch: GMT & a Jubilee
Posts: 669
|
|
22 January 2018, 10:28 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
|
22 January 2018, 11:15 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 2,190
|
Good! That’s what I ended up buying and I’m very pleased.
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present) 116710 GMT Master II BLNR Seiko Prospex LX SNR031 Pelagos 42mm Explorer II 226570 |
22 January 2018, 01:23 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,333
|
|
22 January 2018, 01:31 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 2,190
|
43.5mm. The model number will say 44 in it.
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present) 116710 GMT Master II BLNR Seiko Prospex LX SNR031 Pelagos 42mm Explorer II 226570 |
8 March 2018, 06:21 AM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Illinois
Watch: One I'm wearing!
Posts: 274
|
I've owned vintage Seamaster 300's and I just traded the second Planet Ocean that I've owned (don't ask me why). However, both of the PO's I've owned were XL 45.5mm and the early 2500 series movements. Nothing wrong with them at all and I loved both PO's. I plan on getting another PO in the near future that is slightly smaller and housing the newer 8500 series movement.
|
8 March 2018, 06:40 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
I'd get a first edition PO like the 2201.50 or an early SM 300 with 1120 cal and wave dial. Bernard Watch always has some for sale. Price may not be the best but it's a trusted source.
|
1 July 2020, 01:35 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Issaquah
Posts: 1,599
|
I hope it is ok to bump an old thread. I am going through this same dilemma now - PO vs Diver 300m. I am very interested in the 43.5mm Planet Ocean with dark blue dial and orange accents, white dial Diver 300m (likely on rubber), or the grey dial Diver 300m on bracelet. Talk about first world problems, but this is a tough choice! I like certain things about each watch. For instance, I like the wave dial on the Diver 300m, but I like that hands on the PO as well as the bezel and it just looks like the overall finish is a bit nicer on the PO. I also like both bracelets, but it looks like the PO has a nice taper whereas the Diver 300m is just one diameter all the way around.
I really need to try them on again, but that is currently difficult to do as boutiques and ADs are still closed. Thoughts? Why, as quoted above, is the "PO superior in every measurable way"? |
1 July 2020, 02:00 PM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,333
|
Quote:
|
|
2 July 2020, 12:19 AM | #42 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 601
|
Seamaster Planet Ocean vs 300m Diver
Quote:
Quote:
Opposite for me. I thought it would be unwearable from the written specifications, but when I tried it on it fitted like other 42mm watches. Saying that; the SMP is more versatile because it's thinner. Makes a better watch to wear with dress shirts etc (if someone care about that). End of the day, the PO is probably the best [subjectively] looking diver on the market. So it's a tough choice really.
__________________
|
||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.