ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 May 2021, 01:31 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42
|
I also like the bracelet from the 50th anniversary apollo 11. Does anyone know how much it costs? Thanks.
|
15 May 2021, 02:07 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 57
|
|
15 May 2021, 02:59 AM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
My only complaint is that it's a vintage style bracelet with the downsides that come with that. Hollow end links, light and jangly bracelet, and friction fit stamped clasp with no safety release. As I bought the 1171 for use on my 2012-2017 era 300m the vintage feel is not ideal. And that's not to say I hate vintage style bracelets. I just prefer them on a watch that harkens back to something from the 1950's-1970's like my Silver Watch Co. Milsub homage. |
|
15 May 2021, 11:39 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 122
|
I'm currently wearing my 300m on a Strapcode Jubilee. The fit is perfect. Solid endlinks and it has a substantial, quality feel. Taper is 20/18 so better then the OEM Bond bracelet. I'd prefer 20/16 with a more discrete clasp though.
|
15 May 2021, 10:15 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 6,871
|
Why Taper Matters: Correcting The Omega Seamaster Bracelet
I don’t own the Seamaster 300 mp. So admittedly I’m not an expert. However, this watch is at the top of my wishlist.
I tried one on numerous times, and I definitely prefer the steel bracelet over the rubber strap. So why is the lack of a taper such an issue? When I read these posts, I wanted to see for it myself, but I just didn’t see an issue with it when I tried it on. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
15 May 2021, 10:35 PM | #36 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 12,808
|
Quote:
Others like it just fine as it is. Whatever floats your boat. Sent from my Galaxy S20 using Tapatalk |
|
15 May 2021, 10:39 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: In a house
Posts: 831
|
I love the current bracelet, good balance with the head and super comfortable.
Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk |
16 May 2021, 04:40 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: The Good Life
Posts: 3,085
|
I quite enjoy the current bracelet too, but where it really shines is in the two tone variations. Just that subtle pop of color really takes it to a whole new level.
I think initially, it wore heavier than an oyster to me, and I found the oyster better. Now I’ve come to appreciate both and think the seamaster bracelet is more, umm, masculine if you will. Not that the oyster is feminine, but they both have their own highlights, to the point that I wouldn’t declare one better than the other. Since threads need pics. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 May 2021, 06:02 AM | #39 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 6,871
|
Quote:
That’s gorgeous. It would be sacrilege to swap your bracelet out for anything else. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
16 May 2021, 03:01 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
I find no taper bracelets to look more crude and less refined. I also think I'm used to my Rolex's that typically have a 20/16 taper. It's what my eye is used and looks good to me. There's nothing inherently wrong with a bracelet that doesn't taper. It's just personal preference. |
|
19 May 2021, 06:11 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 211
|
In my Speedy Pro 1861 the bracelet (1958/957) tapers from 20mm to 18mm, though the clasp is 20 mm. That is enough taper to me.
__________________
Rolex 116610LV Rolex 216570 Polar Rolex 116400GV Black Omega Speedmaster Pro 005 |
21 May 2021, 01:23 PM | #42 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 6,871
|
Why Taper Matters: Correcting The Omega Seamaster Bracelet
Quote:
Truth is, I almost always prefer watches on a leather strap except when it comes to Rolex watches. Rolex bracelets are definitely better and more refined. I love the bracelet on my Submariner. I bought a Speedmaster on a leather strap. The bracelet wasn’t even a consideration for me, but again, when it comes to the Seamaster, I really like the bracelet a lot. So it definitely comes down to personal preferences. Plus, it’s a diver. Makes no sense to have a diver with a leather strap on it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 May 2021, 05:44 PM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
My biggest criticism of this watch which I rarely hear mentioned is the bezel design makes it hard to turn especially when compared to my Planet Ocean, otherwise it’s pretty much perfect. |
|
21 May 2021, 09:40 PM | #44 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 1,440
|
Why Taper Matters: Correcting The Omega Seamaster Bracelet
Quote:
You make a good point about the bezel being difficult to turn. I don’t turn mine very often, so I usually forget about that but it’s probably my biggest critique of the 300m just behind the non-tapering bracelet which is purely a subjective thing. As I’ve said before, I could do without the HE valve completely (or shrink it slightly) and I would be perfectly fine if they thinned the case out some or even went back to 41mm or down to 40mm, but those are not “issues” for me as I believe the watch wears and looks great in its current form. The Rolex Submariner remains and will likely always be THE diver for me if I had to choose just one to have forever, but honestly I enjoy wearing the 300m more and on specs and looks alone it goes head-to-head with the Sub which costs twice as much at retail and three times as much on the grey market. The 300m is such an awesome watch at a great price.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV (Hulk) Rolex GMT Master II 126710BLRO (Pepsi) Rolex Daytona 116500LN (White) |
|
21 May 2021, 11:13 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: The Good Life
Posts: 3,085
|
That’s my biggest complaint as well, not a deal breaker, but the dodecahedronal shape is slippery/difficult to grip.
The hev, to me anyway, only shows up in photos. I don’t notice it on the wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 May 2021, 11:36 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Wayne
Location: NC
Watch: 226570
Posts: 3,478
|
I actually prefer a non taper or a slight taper on a Bracelet. Especially on a dive watch. I'm sure I will get roasted for this, But I really don't like the tapper on the new Submariner. I think it's to much. Especially in some photos I have seen when the watch is off the wrist. Disproportioned in reference to the watch head down to the taper . And I think the NEW Seamaster bracelet is leaps and bounds more comfortable and versatile than the Oyster. (ducking... rocks being thrown) Having owned both.
But I have to say the most comfortable bracelet I have ever worn is the Satin brushed finished S3 on the new Breitling 42 SO. That bracelet is incredibly smooth and extremely comfortable. Yes I know, stamp steel clasp and all. But it works and works well. But in the end, we are all different in wrist shape, the way we interpret appearance and function of a watch or band. A lot of issues come to bare just from the way each of us wear a watch or the activity we are involved in. It does make a difference .
__________________
In the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. - Abraham Lincoln __________________________________________________ Rolex 226570, Explorer II Club |
22 May 2021, 08:48 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Watch: SS SkyD
Posts: 564
|
I've had my seamaster for about 13 years, I don't mind the non taper and I'm actually not sure how they could taper it tbh given its construction. I agree with the criticism regarding the difficulty to turn the bezel. Grip isn't great.
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk |
4 January 2022, 03:45 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: EU
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
https://www.amazon.com/Release-Milan...ef_=ast_sto_dp this one is a bit cheaper but i believe it doesnt taper https://www.amazon.com/Release-Super...ef_=ast_sto_dp |
|
4 January 2022, 07:21 PM | #49 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 6,871
|
Why Taper Matters: Correcting The Omega Seamaster Bracelet
Quote:
I’m reading this post I submitted back in last April. I ended up buying one after all and I still like the bracelet a lot. It’s nice having different types of bracelets on different watches. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
4 January 2022, 09:44 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Mark
Location: South Australia
Watch: dj 1603 blue
Posts: 39
|
Another retro variation on milanese is 'Shark Mesh'. Omega even has an OME:
*Dang. 2 posts short to post a pic link, you'll have to google it, sorry... * Part Numbers: 20mm: 020ST1380237 22mm: 020ST1247237 24mm: 020ST1266237 |
11 January 2022, 05:13 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: KY
Watch: Calibre 11 Monaco
Posts: 665
|
|
11 January 2022, 09:31 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: EU
Posts: 22
|
looks very similar to the Uncle Seiko or Forstner Flat link? Am I right?
|
5 February 2022, 09:20 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Austin
Location: NYC / NJ
Watch: GMT/74speedy
Posts: 76
|
That two tone looks dam good
|
6 February 2022, 06:06 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 889
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.