ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 September 2015, 10:46 PM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: Australia (MEL)
Posts: 7
|
Excellent review, Brucie!
|
22 September 2015, 01:37 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Peyman
Location: Teh
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 34
|
Hi everyone!
The noob that I am has to make a final decision on his first Rolex watch! I've gone through many polls and stuff but still can't decide between the SubC date and the BLNR! Having looked at the OP's stunning pics, now I'm a BLNR guy ... Problem is that I come up with equally stunning pics of the SubC and then ... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 November 2015, 01:59 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3
|
Nice review, I hope to add a GMTII BLNR to my collection in the near future.
|
24 February 2016, 11:57 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 19
|
Great review. Just got this watch a few days ago. Loving it.
|
26 February 2016, 07:06 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Epsom
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 55
|
First post (hi all) and first Rolex love this watch so much!!
|
18 May 2016, 04:06 AM | #66 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Great review
|
23 May 2016, 10:07 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Peter
Location: Australia.
Watch: ?????
Posts: 1,015
|
Love at first sight ...
|
19 July 2017, 11:06 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: the world
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 28
|
The BLNR truly is marvelous
|
27 July 2017, 03:15 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8
|
Great review. It's between this and the Explorer 1 for me. Need to go to the AD and try both of them on several more times, as well as do some more research before I make my choice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
31 July 2017, 10:00 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 25
|
Very nice review, Bruce. That watch is a superb companion to your Datejust 116200.
Quote:
In your case, perhaps it boils down to the following questions: (1) do you want/need a date display (and cyclops)? (2) would the second timezone function have any real benefit for you? (3) do you prefer a watch that tells everyone it's a Rolex, or one that is more understated about that fact? Go with your heart, and don't sweat it too much: you can't really go wrong with either model. |
|
31 July 2017, 11:36 PM | #71 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
These are the questions that I've been debating and feel that I have my answers. I'm leaning heavily towards the Explorer, the only hang up right now is that I want/need to see the 39mm with large hands in person. I've tried on the 39mm with the short hands and loved the feel of it on the wrist. Since I really did love the feel and look of the BLNR as well I'll pick that one up second, and it won't matter to me if it's used or new. At this point the only reason I'd get it instead of the Explorer is if I don't like the look of it with the larger hands. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.