ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 February 2012, 10:35 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
|
Gunter, I'd also recommend the 312, esp. as you stated a date as being important. Great all rounder with in-house movement and well proportioned dial. Good luck on your hunt...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks ------------------------------------------------------------- |
22 February 2012, 03:50 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
He would really recommend the 312
__________________
John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar |
22 February 2012, 04:01 AM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Tony
Location: USA
Watch: 210, GMT2C
Posts: 499
|
|
22 February 2012, 04:02 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
|
23 February 2012, 09:06 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,060
|
PAM 25 for something different but watch because the TI will scratch like you wouldnt believe
|
28 February 2012, 11:29 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
000 or 005
|
29 February 2012, 01:39 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
Watch: Panerai 305
Posts: 200
|
I just bought my first PAM and it arrived last thursday. A 177. Couldn't be happier :)
__________________
▪ Panerai 305 ▪ Rolex DeepSea ▪ Omega Planet Ocean ▪ Casio G-Shock Riseman ▪ |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.