The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 October 2022, 08:09 PM   #1
mountainjogger
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,672
Musk offers to complete Twitter purchase

On the eve of trial.

https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk...e5be7a1388e0fd
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2022, 08:18 PM   #2
mountainjogger
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,672
And his deposition was set to begin tomorrow.
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2022, 11:37 PM   #3
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,426
USA's DC office squatters are going to be upset, there goes their propaganda platform.
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2022, 11:51 PM   #4
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
What were the odds that the DE court enforced the specific performance clause? Apparently high, since he’s doing this?
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2022, 11:54 PM   #5
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,652
Read it on twitter
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 12:04 AM   #6
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Ferry View Post
What were the odds that the DE court enforced the specific performance clause? Apparently high, since he’s doing this?
Well, it was all his doing after all. His other option was to pay a billion dollars to back out of the deal.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 12:15 AM   #7
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by dddrees View Post
Well, it was all his doing after all. His other option was to pay a billion dollars to back out of the deal.
I think you’d be more likely to see a buyer getting specific performance. Just having the clause in a valid contract is not enough; this is equitable relief that requires showing irreparable harm, lack of other good remedies at law, etc. Since businesses are unique and dollars are fungible it’d be easier for a buyer to make that case. It’s not clear to me what happened here — e.g., whether Musk’s lawyers thought the court would force him to do the deal anyway, or whether his lawyers just thought he owed the break fee and the prospect of paying the break fee really pissed Musk off
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 12:34 AM   #8
mountainjogger
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Ferry View Post
I think you’d be more likely to see a buyer getting specific performance. Just having the clause in a valid contract is not enough; this is equitable relief that requires showing irreparable harm, lack of other good remedies at law, etc. Since businesses are unique and dollars are fungible it’d be easier for a buyer to make that case. It’s not clear to me what happened here — e.g., whether Musk’s lawyers thought the court would force him to do the deal anyway, or whether his lawyers just thought he owed the break fee and the prospect of paying the break fee really pissed Musk off
Paying elevated interest rates has also been mentioned. Don't know if that is contractual, statutory, or based on increased market rates.

Being subject to deposition tomorrow may have been another consideraton.
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 12:42 AM   #9
330ci
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Ferry View Post
I think you’d be more likely to see a buyer getting specific performance. Just having the clause in a valid contract is not enough; this is equitable relief that requires showing irreparable harm, lack of other good remedies at law, etc. Since businesses are unique and dollars are fungible it’d be easier for a buyer to make that case. It’s not clear to me what happened here — e.g., whether Musk’s lawyers thought the court would force him to do the deal anyway, or whether his lawyers just thought he owed the break fee and the prospect of paying the break fee really pissed Musk off
After reading his proposed plan to monetize Twitter and cut down on costs, I think he realizes its a diamond in the rough. His proposed use of blockchain is going to be incredible if implemented properly. I don't plan on using it, but definitely interested to see how the platform progresses.
330ci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 05:36 AM   #10
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Ferry View Post
I think you’d be more likely to see a buyer getting specific performance. Just having the clause in a valid contract is not enough; this is equitable relief that requires showing irreparable harm, lack of other good remedies at law, etc. Since businesses are unique and dollars are fungible it’d be easier for a buyer to make that case. It’s not clear to me what happened here — e.g., whether Musk’s lawyers thought the court would force him to do the deal anyway, or whether his lawyers just thought he owed the break fee and the prospect of paying the break fee really pissed Musk off
Based on what I heard he had a good idea what he was getting into. If he didn’t maybe he should have spent more time making sure he knew what he was getting into before making an offer and less time talking. He may very well be good at something’s, but this one sounds more of his doing than anyone else’s fault.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.