ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 June 2012, 05:56 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Andrew C
Location: London
Watch: Omega liquid Metal
Posts: 38
|
Liquid metal PO or new 42mm PO with 8500 movement
Thoughts appreciated, found a mint 2nd hand liquid metal but will I regret not going for newer model, 42mm with glass case back and ceramic bezel
Help and thoughts please |
9 June 2012, 06:04 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Erik
Location: Sweden
Watch: SD
Posts: 43
|
I have the PO 8500 , not the liquid metal one. And i could not be happier .The liquid metal one is to light i think, and feels a little cheap.
|
9 June 2012, 06:46 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: uk
Watch: omega PO LM LE
Posts: 77
|
When in the Omega AD I had the choice of both as they had one only PO LM. I quite fancied the 8500 movement. But when I tried both on and put them side by side there really was no comparison . The PO LM just dazzled. You really do have to see it to believe it. The LM and ceramic bezel really is a work of art. The detail is incredible.I found the 8500 to be way too thick for my liking. And believe me I wear mine every day and it is NOT a light watch. Plus it is a very rare and desirable watch. Mine gets compliments daily...Just my 2 cents .
|
9 June 2012, 07:57 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,148
|
Both are great watches, I personally prefer the understated charm of the cal. 8500 Planet Ocean. There is no wrong choice here, just go for the one that sings to you
|
9 June 2012, 08:48 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
|
seems like a no brainer to me -- I would pounce on the LM LE --
If you think that the decision was the wrong one (although I can't imagine that after having it on your wrist once - you would have any doubt) -- the 8500 will always be around...the LMLE - only 1938 in the world - Not only a gorgeous watch, but an actual limited edition (ahem 11007 bond 50s??!!) Plus - it is the ONLY watch in my collection for which I haev evr paid full MSRP... |
9 June 2012, 09:01 PM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Quote:
+1 Fr. John+ |
|
9 June 2012, 10:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,124
|
I would go for the 8500, because I prefer the matte look of the ceramic and the movement is truly a work of art that represents a real step forward for Omega.
You can't go wrong with either, I would just rather put my $$$ into the movement, as opposed to the aesthetics of the watch.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
9 June 2012, 11:06 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
I like the 8500 PO too
|
9 June 2012, 11:44 PM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,271
|
Quote:
|
|
10 June 2012, 08:41 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: US
Posts: 294
|
PO LM LE IMHO. It's a beauiful piece and only 1948 pieces made. Good luck on your decision.
|
10 June 2012, 08:51 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
Quote:
__________________
My grails: |
|
10 June 2012, 09:34 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
I've owned three 8500 movements and all seven of my 2500C watches have been as accurate and reliable as the 8500s.
I am blessed to be one of the 1948 who will own the unique Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE. I love the elegant look and way the slender case and the bracelet caress my wrist. The thickness of the 8500 case and the gray bezel are deal killers for me. I am in no way tempted by the new Planet Oceans. Fr. John+ |
10 June 2012, 11:12 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Eirik
Location: Norway
Watch: Rolex/Omega/PAM
Posts: 1,160
|
I really like the 8500 PO but I was always going to wait until a LM LE was available (second hand two months old). Now that I got it, I am really happy with my decision.
|
10 June 2012, 11:35 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
PO LM LE - because there are only 1948 of them around
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.