ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 December 2010, 12:09 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit
Posts: 175
|
is this cool, or is it not?
|
21 December 2010, 12:13 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
not bad imo - i'd suggest to do a search. this topic has been covered a few times in the past few weeks.
|
21 December 2010, 12:13 PM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,347
|
I lot of people do think they're cool, including Tools who did a review of the most recent addition to the line.
I think they're pointless, but I'm certainly not against them. To each his own, I say. Certainly, an exhibition back isn't in anyone's face, like, say, a PVD coating, which by the way, I'm okay with, too, although I wouldn't do it to one of my Rolex watches.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
21 December 2010, 12:25 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Watch: Casio G-Shock
Posts: 199
|
if I'd wanted a crystal back watch I'd buy one that comes that way. I don't like mods or alterations outside of bracelet or band switches. JMHO.
|
21 December 2010, 12:30 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Tommy
Location: Seoul, Korea
Watch: 116520 Black
Posts: 337
|
it would look nice & unique for sure, though i wouldn't try it myself.
IMO going for clearbacks seems to project uniqueness, but Rolex watches maintain their uniqueness through its original state alone! |
21 December 2010, 12:57 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
I personally wouldn't modify any high-end watch I own. It looks good though..
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
21 December 2010, 12:59 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 35,733
|
Completely reversible, why not?
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
21 December 2010, 01:48 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,695
|
Quote:
|
|
21 December 2010, 02:04 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 106
|
IMHO changing to sapphire crystal defeats the purpose of water proof by rolex and the scripts on the submariner (300M=1000ft) will be worthless.
|
21 December 2010, 02:21 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: West Hartford, CT
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 1,224
|
Yes-
__________________
“Time is an illusion.” – Albert Einstein |
21 December 2010, 02:28 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: GMTIIc
Posts: 183
|
I wouldn't put it on my watch but I think it looks pretty cool if you're into display backs. I'd say go for it if you like it...you can always switch it back!
|
21 December 2010, 02:33 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: Daytona, Explorer
Posts: 218
|
no harm...adds a little twist... and makes your watch unique for you. Seems like a good idea
|
21 December 2010, 10:34 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Exactly. Its not like painting a moustache on the Mona Lisa, and can be undone in 10 minutes. And mine pressure tested just fine afterwards with the 1st gen Preik case back.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
22 December 2010, 12:20 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,812
|
Why not?
__________________
My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/ |
22 December 2010, 12:26 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
|
As it is reversable, I like it a lot.
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP |
22 December 2010, 01:38 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,149
|
I like display backs when the movement is decorated. Doesn't strike me as too interesting on a Rolex, but certainly not objectionable.
If you ever get a chance to look at the movement of a Lange, you will want one. I went through a brief phase where a display back was a required feature of any watch purchase. Then one day I realized that I never looked at them & ended up selling my display back watches (JLC Reverso Grande Date & AP 15300). |
22 December 2010, 04:17 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
'you can use the original Rolex Opener Nr.5 29,50 mm
to screw your Rolex safety.' Uhhh... Pardon? Lol. |
22 December 2010, 04:24 AM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Fred
Location: KY, USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 9,993
|
I love it!
__________________
Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group |
22 December 2010, 07:20 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,002
|
Not for me.
__________________
Licensed to kill time. |
22 December 2010, 07:29 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Danny
Location: georgia
Watch: it Bub
Posts: 1,334
|
clear
looks good..
... It's Your Thang.. Do What You wana Do !!!!!!!! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.