ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 September 2020, 09:17 PM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 388
|
Quote:
As for the OP, I'd say it's a tad too big but it still looks OK Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk |
|
9 September 2020, 09:24 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Uk
Posts: 207
|
Personally I'm not keen on the larger size. If it had stayed at 40m with the slimmer lugs I think the response in general would have been better and I'd have wanted one. This new size doesn't want me to change my current watch.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk |
9 September 2020, 09:30 PM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,650
|
It’s a beauty
|
9 September 2020, 09:41 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,652
|
Looks good on your wrist
|
9 September 2020, 10:16 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,821
|
Yeah the new sub looks fantastic!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
9 September 2020, 10:44 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,859
|
__________________
|
9 September 2020, 10:56 PM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 5,921
|
Size is personal preference. I think 6.5 wrist up will look good on this 41mm Sub.
From your picture, it looks perfect on your wrist. |
9 September 2020, 11:41 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,590
|
Quote:
This new sub has got the proportions of the SD43. This images of your are amazing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible. |
|
10 September 2020, 12:23 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jim
Location: Waterford, CT
Watch: Navitmer 1 B01
Posts: 516
|
This size thing is really interesting. I think it was a Hodinkee review, that compared the old vs. the new Sub case sizes. It was brought up that when the cases were actually "miked", the old Sub was 40.2 and the new Sub is 40.5mm. So we're talking round up and round down as decided by Rolex. Side by side pictures showed an indiscernible diameter difference as we're talking about .3mm difference. That being said, the new tapered lugs and the 1mm wider bracelet as it meets the watch head make for a much more integrated look IMO. The new clasp is 1 mm wider than the existing clasp, as stated in the review. For me, I have never been crazy about the Maxi case lugs and the way they capture light or how they connect to the 20mm bracelet. Just my 2 cents. I plan on getting a new one down the road when all the hubris dies down.
__________________
Regards, Jim |
10 September 2020, 01:24 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,596
|
Another point of reference: new Sub and BLNR on the same wrist (i.e., mine). Regardless of size preference, it's clear they wear very similar and if one works, the other one does as well. BLNR is mine, Sub is not :(
|
10 September 2020, 01:26 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 212
|
The bracelet and the clasp is the real problem.
|
10 September 2020, 01:44 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 190
|
I prefer the 11 series Submariner but my favorite of all the dive watches remains the SD4K. I have a 6.75” wrist.
|
10 September 2020, 01:47 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 5,906
|
Looks good on your wrist and will look even better when sized. The new Sub is a hit.
|
10 September 2020, 02:11 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Seattle
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 777
|
Looks great. Thanks for the pics, I also have a just under 7’ wrist and am on a list for the new sub.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Daytona White 116500LN, GMT II BLNR, Explorer II Polar, Submariner 116610LV, GMT II BLRO, Sky Dweller Blue. |
10 September 2020, 03:24 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Tim
Location: Worcestershire,UK
Watch: Coke 16710
Posts: 894
|
Jenni elle just posted a vid on youtube on this issue comparing Hulk to the new cermit
Diameter Hulk 40.2mm and cermit 40.5mm Depth same both watches Lug to lug same both watches So the issue is 0.3mm on the diameter? Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
__________________
Tim. 124060 Submariner, 16710 Coke, 16570 Black dial, Datejust 41 Wimbledon dial, Tudor Black Bay GMT, Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue, Tudor Black Bay 58 925, Tudor Prince Date Chronograph (panda dial) |
10 September 2020, 03:34 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
For me, the issue is with the size increase in the clasp...the width is over 1mm from the previous Sub. I need to try it on to see how it wears but the larger clasp and bracelet was one of the things I preferred on the older Sub to when I had the SD43 for ex.
|
10 September 2020, 04:00 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 31
|
Thanks a lot everyone for your opinions! It looks like the majority votes that the watch looks really good on my wrist!
tbh I was skeptical before trying the watch as I know that the watch looks perfect on ~7.5'' wrists and I always preferred more vintage sizes but when I tried that it felt really really good! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.