ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 February 2020, 08:48 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: newcastle
Posts: 342
|
|
17 February 2020, 12:07 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
1675 Member of Nylon Nation Member of Red Sox Nation Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
17 February 2020, 01:09 PM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Great White North
Posts: 696
|
No doubt about it....1675:
|
17 February 2020, 06:43 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,014
|
|
17 February 2020, 09:10 PM | #67 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Australia
Watch: 14270 14060
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
|
|
17 February 2020, 09:12 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Australia
Watch: 14270 14060
Posts: 318
|
I am shotting for a 16700 or 16710 rather than the 4 digit... mainly because I have lost trust in most sellers of the older Rollers... The 4 digit is clearer more likely to have been bastardised either by Rolex or others. The 5 digits are also easier to date IMO with more accurate serials... and same with the bracelets. Just my view
|
17 February 2020, 11:12 PM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: France
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
I am looking to buy a GMT Master and have been hesitating forever between 1675, 16710.. For some reason, the square crown guards on the 1675 slim case have been very appealing to me. But on your picture the GMT Master II also have comparable crown guards (grown being sligthly larger). Most of the examples of 16710 I saw have almost non existant crown guards. |
|
5 March 2020, 01:00 PM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: St Louis
Watch: 16710 Pepsi
Posts: 17
|
16710 is my preferred watch. I enjoy the modern features of the watch, but the look and size of the 1675.
|
6 March 2020, 08:10 PM | #71 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 16710, PP 5167
Posts: 840
|
1675 GMT v 16710 GMT which is more collectable
Quote:
That’s why you have to hunt until you find a nice one with crown guards. Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: swisswatchologist |
|
6 March 2020, 08:51 PM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: España
Posts: 179
|
1675, but 16710 is not bad.
Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk |
6 March 2020, 09:19 PM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 271
|
*****
1978 GMT Master 1675; full original parts; 1st owner; cpl. set incl. invoice of $ 515,-. |
25 March 2020, 04:30 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 371
|
Holy crap that watch is a beauty
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @madelocalinvesting |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.