The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 September 2022, 04:05 PM   #541
RFA
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Real Name: Roger
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisrm02 View Post
Tudor has a way of making watches that just feel special and keep me buying. I also couldn’t stop myself from buying the 925. And even though I have a sub, p38 and OG pelagos I also want an FXD.

Bronze 58 also has me intrigued as does the OG black 58. I thought once I had a sub that would be it but Tudors latest releases keep dragging me to the AD and sucking the cash out of my pocket.
Yes, a bronze with the Herrods bezel would be sharp.
RFA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2022, 04:33 PM   #542
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
Ducked in to try it on. Def want it




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2022, 06:23 AM   #543
shaunylw
"TRF" Member
 
shaunylw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,504
Tried it on today, i might be in the minority, but it felt very cheap. The weight was something i couldn’t get into. But, if you want an ultra light diver, hard to beat. Dial and insert look awesome, proportions are amazing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shaunylw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2022, 08:28 AM   #544
Luisrm02
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Florida
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunylw View Post
Tried it on today, i might be in the minority, but it felt very cheap. The weight was something i couldn’t get into. But, if you want an ultra light diver, hard to beat. Dial and insert look awesome, proportions are amazing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Titanium watches def feel light and can be perceived as "cheap". The OG had the advantage of the stainless clasp to go along with the caseback which added a little extra weight to the bracelet. Having said that, having them both, once you strap them on they end up the most comfortable watched you’ll wear. Even when I pop my Sub on now it feels heavy!
Luisrm02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2022, 08:36 AM   #545
shaunylw
"TRF" Member
 
shaunylw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisrm02 View Post
Titanium watches def feel light and can be perceived as "cheap". The OG had the advantage of the stainless clasp to go along with the caseback which added a little extra weight to the bracelet. Having said that, having them both, once you strap them on they end up the most comfortable watched you’ll wear. Even when I pop my Sub on now it feels heavy!

That was my main concern that kept me away. I think i would get very used to the weight, and anything else would feel too heavy. When i would wear a 14060 on rubber, that was the same feeling. Anything else felt enormous.

Tudor continues to crush it, very excited for the brand. I had a nice conversation with our AD manager today about watches and Tudor and many amazing watches they are pumping out.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
shaunylw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2022, 09:21 AM   #546
In-Cog-Neeto
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Around
Posts: 1,124
Any new owners able, or willing, to put this on an MN type parachute strap for us less fortunate types to see how it looks?
__________________
That's what watches are for; not just for recording the time; but our own travel through that time. - Explorer Steve
In-Cog-Neeto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2022, 10:08 AM   #547
Bet
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 106
Absolutely beautiful!
Bet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2022, 11:02 AM   #548
csong825
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: New England
Watch: 126710BLNR
Posts: 94
New Tudor Pelagos 39MM

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunylw View Post
Tried it on today, i might be in the minority, but it felt very cheap. The weight was something i couldn’t get into. But, if you want an ultra light diver, hard to beat. Dial and insert look awesome, proportions are amazing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1 I really tried to love it but it felt “too light” for a dive watch. Also wasn’t a fan of the sunburst bezel. The sunburst on the dial was super subtle which is good. Proportions are spot on. I tried on a BB58 and it felt much better for me. I think it’s a well made watch and will sell like hotcakes. There are few other watches out there like it. Just not for me.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
csong825 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2022, 03:06 PM   #549
rolex818
"TRF" Member
 
rolex818's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: California
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunylw View Post
Tried it on today, i might be in the minority, but it felt very cheap. The weight was something i couldn’t get into. But, if you want an ultra light diver, hard to beat. Dial and insert look awesome, proportions are amazing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1. Tried it over the weekend.

It’s no doubt a great looking watch. But felt like a cheap toy; dare I say like a foogazi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rolex818 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2022, 01:15 AM   #550
Wahlberg
"TRF" Member
 
Wahlberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,530
The rubber bracelet came with the titanium one right? Anyone have pictures?
Wahlberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2022, 01:45 AM   #551
solesman
"TRF" Member
 
solesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 526
Found this on Instagram from an account called sr_watches.

Quote:
Originally Posted by In-Cog-Neeto View Post
Any new owners able, or willing, to put this on an MN type parachute strap for us less fortunate types to see how it looks?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg rsz_img_6302.jpg (112.7 KB, 920 views)
solesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2022, 08:24 AM   #552
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 754
The size change is great, but the loss of the 3D chapter ring, matte bezel, and Pelagos clasp make this a miss.

This is better than the Black Bay (It's basically a Black Bay Ti) but it loses much of what makes the Pelagos special.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 September 2022, 02:02 PM   #553
In-Cog-Neeto
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Around
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by solesman View Post
Found this on Instagram from an account called sr_watches.
Great find mate, thank you
__________________
That's what watches are for; not just for recording the time; but our own travel through that time. - Explorer Steve
In-Cog-Neeto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2022, 08:19 PM   #554
AnakChan
"TRF" Member
 
AnakChan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Oz
Posts: 143
Hope it’s ok to necropost as I don’t think my post is worthy of a new thread.

I finally managed to see & try the Pelagos 39 in a recent trip to the AD. There were a few surprises despite how much I had read up about it. Probably the first was how small it looked. Putting it on my wrist I actually felt it was more comparable to a DJ36 than the expected 39. Measurement-wise I’m sure it’s 39, but maybe the balance of the dial-to-bezel ratio made the watch looked dainty.

Furthermore the clasp looked big, which felt almost comparable to my SD43 in length. Definitely longer than the DJ41 clasp. So, again, to me, the balance of the watch case to the clasp length felt a little off to me.

However what I did love was the weight. It’s absolutely nothing on the wrist (esp coming from an SD43, or even the DJ41). Also the Ti finish was beautiful. I do like the understated look for a change from mirror finishes.

W.R.T the imbalances though I’m sure in time one would get to it.
__________________
126300 - Black Dial Smooth Bezel Oyster
126600
16013
AnakChan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2022, 07:28 AM   #555
bohren
"TRF" Member
 
bohren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Germany
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 63
Thought I join here and show 3 wristshots with my 14060M, the Pelagos 39 and the BB58. All were done at a similar distance. Though the angle is not identical, I cropped these so that each watch should be very close to its original size in relation to the others.
It's not exact science, but it's as good as it gets unless I would shoot them static side by side, but I think showing them on the wrist, delivers what it's all about: How they wear and look in real life.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 220930_15940_Rolex-14060M_1200.jpg (179.2 KB, 601 views)
File Type: jpg 220930_15939_Tudor-Pelagos39_1200.jpg (190.3 KB, 600 views)
File Type: jpg 220930_15943_Tudor-BB58_1200.jpg (176.9 KB, 598 views)
bohren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2022, 03:53 PM   #556
Mendota
"TRF" Member
 
Mendota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MN
Watch: OP36 Blue 3-6-9
Posts: 2,192
^^Great looking watches and they are all the perfect size for you. I really like the new Pelagos 39 in that pic.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Mendota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2022, 05:08 PM   #557
rgwarden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: London
Watch: 124270
Posts: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolex818 View Post
+1. Tried it over the weekend.

It’s no doubt a great looking watch. But felt like a cheap toy; dare I say like a foogazi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I essentially liked what it looked like but didn’t like what it felt like.
rgwarden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2022, 05:18 PM   #558
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgwarden View Post
I essentially liked what it looked like but didn’t like what it felt like.
It does take a little while to get used to, but once you are used to the lack of weight it’s great.
Stevec14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2022, 05:44 PM   #559
Lew Archer
"TRF" Member
 
Lew Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by bohren View Post
Thought I join here and show 3 wristshots with my 14060M, the Pelagos 39 and the BB58. All were done at a similar distance. Though the angle is not identical, I cropped these so that each watch should be very close to its original size in relation to the others.
It's not exact science, but it's as good as it gets unless I would shoot them static side by side, but I think showing them on the wrist, delivers what it's all about: How they wear and look in real life.
Great photo array...and they all look terrific.
Lew Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2022, 06:37 AM   #560
bohren
"TRF" Member
 
bohren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Germany
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mendota View Post
^^Great looking watches and they are all the perfect size for you. I really like the new Pelagos 39 in that pic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew Archer View Post
Great photo array...and they all look terrific.
Thank you, Gentlemen!

Some more and fwiw: My wrist is 17-17.5 cm depending on the temperature and with a calliper without pressing the sides I get 55 - 58 mm.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 220923_15857_Tudor-Pelagos39.jpg (177.3 KB, 524 views)
File Type: jpg 220922_15819_Tudor-Pelagos39.jpg (181.2 KB, 526 views)
File Type: jpg 220922_15815_Tudor-Pelagos39.jpg (187.0 KB, 521 views)
bohren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2022, 06:54 AM   #561
Shadow Play
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 647
Tried on the Pelagos 39 at the Tudor Boutique in Glasgow. Nice watch. Feels kind of strange how light it is but I’m sure you’d get used to it within a day or two.
Shadow Play is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2022, 04:30 PM   #562
mquarter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: 5-digit steel
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by bohren View Post
Thought I join here and show 3 wristshots with my 14060M, the Pelagos 39 and the BB58.
Thanks for your photos. In terms of aesthetics on the wrist I would rank them 14060M > BB58 blue > Pelagos 39
__________________
♛ Submariner 14060m, 2-line
♛ Explorer II 16570, polar
♛ Cosmograph Daytona 16520, white dial
mquarter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2022, 09:24 PM   #563
bohren
"TRF" Member
 
bohren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Germany
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by mquarter View Post
Thanks for your photos. In terms of aesthetics on the wrist I would rank them 14060M > BB58 blue > Pelagos 39
Thank you! Yeah, that's what I rank them too.

I made another series to show how they compare. This is intended to demonstrate the size in relation and the impact of the design on the perceived presence or size. Of course these are all shot static from the same distance.

It shows quite good that the Pelagos 39 has a somewhat 'bulky' (compact / strong) appearance with it's wider bezel and the 21 mm lug distance. And also how much presence the BB58 has, which is the smallest in case size, but has the biggest dial.

The diameter of the crystals:
29.1 mm 14060M
29.5 mm Pelagos 39
31.0 mm Black Bay 58

Due to the set up of light and angle there are almost no reflections on the dials and hands, which robs the 14060M as well as the BB58 much of their special charms. So these pictures are not a basis for a beauty contest, I want to say.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 221002_15962_Rolex-14060M.jpg (185.3 KB, 431 views)
File Type: jpg 221002_15963_Tudor-Pelagos39.jpg (182.6 KB, 431 views)
File Type: jpg 221002_15961_Tudor-BB58.jpg (190.8 KB, 430 views)
bohren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2022, 09:50 PM   #564
bohren
"TRF" Member
 
bohren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Germany
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 63
And some wristshots:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 220923_15874_Tudor-Pelagos39.j.jpg (184.0 KB, 426 views)
File Type: jpg 220923_15890_Tudor-Pelagos39.j.jpg (169.6 KB, 422 views)
File Type: jpg 220923_15893_Tudor-Pelagos39.j.jpg (162.9 KB, 424 views)
File Type: jpg 220923_15907_Tudor-Pelagos39.j.jpg (175.3 KB, 428 views)
File Type: jpg 220923_15872_Tudor-Pelagos39.jpg (162.4 KB, 428 views)
bohren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 11:37 AM   #565
JasoninDenver
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by bohren View Post
And some wristshots:
Excellent shots!

I am curious as to how you feel about having both a Sub and the P39? Do you think you will keep both?

I have a 116610 and really want the Pelagos but do wonder If I need two very similar watches.
__________________
Jason

116610 LN
DateJust
Pelagos FXD
JasoninDenver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 01:57 PM   #566
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by bohren View Post
Thank you! Yeah, that's what I rank them too.

I made another series to show how they compare. This is intended to demonstrate the size in relation and the impact of the design on the perceived presence or size. Of course these are all shot static from the same distance.

It shows quite good that the Pelagos 39 has a somewhat 'bulky' (compact / strong) appearance with it's wider bezel and the 21 mm lug distance. And also how much presence the BB58 has, which is the smallest in case size, but has the biggest dial.

The diameter of the crystals:
29.1 mm 14060M
29.5 mm Pelagos 39
31.0 mm Black Bay 58

Due to the set up of light and angle there are almost no reflections on the dials and hands, which robs the 14060M as well as the BB58 much of their special charms. So these pictures are not a basis for a beauty contest, I want to say.
I’ve mentioned this often over the years, but virtually all my issues with the Black Bay would disappear if it used the Submariner/GMT bezel edge instead of the coin edge, which was only extremely briefly used on Subs and never with the Snowflake hand.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2022, 02:10 PM   #567
Dougiebaby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood View Post
This will be popular. I think it should have come in at 40mm but overall nice looking piece.

The bezel is 40mm (overhangs 39mm case).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dougiebaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2022, 02:03 AM   #568
huba01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,425
Thanks for sharing, amazing photos
huba01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2022, 03:53 AM   #569
minute_man
2024 Pledge Member
 
minute_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisrm02 View Post
Titanium watches def feel light and can be perceived as "cheap". The OG had the advantage of the stainless clasp to go along with the caseback which added a little extra weight to the bracelet. Having said that, having them both, once you strap them on they end up the most comfortable watched you’ll wear. Even when I pop my Sub on now it feels heavy!
The lightness of the 42 is somehow more unexpected than that of the 39 when handling for the first time.
Both great and comfortable watches.
__________________
2FA Enabled
minute_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2022, 04:50 AM   #570
Mabak
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: United States
Posts: 37
Awesome look!
Mabak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.