The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 May 2018, 03:28 AM   #181
Wahlberg
"TRF" Member
 
Wahlberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raza_actual View Post
A Coke can sparkles in the sun too—that doesn’t make it flashy. A Datejust is basically the epitome of conservative styling as well; something I’d consider an “old man’s “ watch.
A 16710 coke doesn't sparkle as much as a new DJ since it's all brushed.
Wahlberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 05:24 AM   #182
Raza_actual
"TRF" Member
 
Raza_actual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: Monaco
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wahlberg View Post
A 16710 coke doesn't sparkle as much as a new DJ since it's all brushed.

__________________
TAG Heuer Monaco LE|Omega Speedmaster|Tudor Ranger|Rolex Submariner
Raza_actual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 05:59 AM   #183
Justinmg
"TRF" Member
 
Justinmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO
Posts: 3,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raza_actual View Post
People do love to claim that Rolex is losing their tool watch ways—which is at extreme odds with the pure fact that Rolex watches are more capable, more durable, and more accurate than ever before.
Look at the packaging, these watches were designed for a job. The new stuff is bland and lacks that spirt that WAS Rolex. It’s jewelry now, they put a cyclops on the SD, I’m sure that wasn’t a request from COMEX
__________________
////////////////////////////////
Member of The Nylon Nation

Does it do anything? It tells the time.
Justinmg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 06:06 AM   #184
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,908
The biggest problem with Rolex, is not Rolex - but the people wearing them.

"What is a good investment piece?"
"OMG, I have a ding in my clasp. What to do?"

And so on - and the same people complain that Rolex do not make tool watches anymore. That's BS, because it's the people wearing the Rolex watches that has partly stopped using the watches as tools...
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 06:21 AM   #185
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
The biggest problem with Rolex, is not Rolex - but the people wearing them.

"What is a good investment piece?"
"OMG, I have a ding in my clasp. What to do?"

And so on - and the same people complain that Rolex do not make tool watches anymore. That's BS, because it's the people wearing the Rolex watches that has partly stopped using the watches as tools...
In this brave new world I think just using your watch to tell the time and leaving your damn cell phone at home for a few hours makes you a hero.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 11:15 AM   #186
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
I realize this thread is over two years old however, after receiving an email today in which the AD relayed that they cannot take orders for the new CHNR and that they were instructed to hand them out to their customers with the same judicial care as they do the Daytonas, it really makes me wonder about the company and whether or not I should call my collection complete and leave it at that.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 11:20 AM   #187
RHIII
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
This is exactly why I have several brands in my collection. When I get tired of something I rotate. Tastes change - it happens and sometimes it's a good thing!!

I went on about a year and a half stint where I didn't put a Rolex on my wrist and stuck with other brands -- and I'm ok with that. Anything can become stale overtime.

Just my .02
RHIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 11:25 AM   #188
Pmt2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
I’m getting tired of all the Rolex games! It’s not the same anymore.
Pmt2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 11:30 AM   #189
Muxi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanFox View Post
I believe that 15-20 years from now the current ceramic models will largely be viewed as the greatest Rolex watches ever made. They’re built to last. The ceramic bezel will ensure that your watch looks the same in 20 years as it did the date of your purchase. No fades, no scratches, cant speak to the bracelet as scratches are inevitable on all bracelets, however, the face of your watch wont change much in appearance.
I agree. In much the same way, some cars with its own cult following perceive the newer models tonhave lost its soul (Jeep JK Rubicon). Owning one since 2011 I found it quite durable and easy to live with, even quite fun to drive. With an all new model, perhaps the discontinued model will be more accepted by purists to be a proper Jeep after all.
Muxi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 11:40 AM   #190
Justinmg
"TRF" Member
 
Justinmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO
Posts: 3,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanFox View Post
I believe that 15-20 years from now the current ceramic models will largely be viewed as the greatest Rolex watches ever made. They’re built to last. The ceramic bezel will ensure that your watch looks the same in 20 years as it did the date of your purchase. No fades, no scratches, cant speak to the bracelet as scratches are inevitable on all bracelets, however, the face of your watch wont change much in appearance.
I think what draws people to the vintage side is the faded dials and bezels, it’s the patina. A perfect 20 yr old ceramic Rolex sounds pretty boring to me.

And no way any of the new plastic covered jeeps will be as cool as a CJ7 IMO, the same with most new cars, I grew up in the wrong time.
__________________
////////////////////////////////
Member of The Nylon Nation

Does it do anything? It tells the time.
Justinmg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 03:41 PM   #191
PJitz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: North
Posts: 333
Rolex watches stopped being tools during the quartz crisis. After trying to make use of the technology with the OQ, they pivoted towards the luxury brand they are today.

Not being pure tools anymore doesn't change the fact that modern Rolex products are undeniably technically better mechanical watches than their vintage counterparts. We all love mechanical watches so aside from aesthetic preferences, I don't see much to complain about with the company's current direction in terms of product.
PJitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 09:24 PM   #192
Oscarpapa
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Noah
Location: Ulster
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
The biggest problem with Rolex, is not Rolex - but the people wearing them.

"What is a good investment piece?"
"OMG, I have a ding in my clasp. What to do?"

And so on - and the same people complain that Rolex do not make tool watches anymore. That's BS, because it's the people wearing the Rolex watches that has partly stopped using the watches as tools...
Good points.
Oscarpapa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2018, 09:33 PM   #193
Oscarpapa
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Noah
Location: Ulster
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJitz View Post
Rolex watches stopped being tools during the quartz crisis. After trying to make use of the technology with the OQ, they pivoted towards the luxury brand they are today.

Not being pure tools anymore doesn't change the fact that modern Rolex products are undeniably technically better mechanical watches than their vintage counterparts. We all love mechanical watches so aside from aesthetic preferences, I don't see much to complain about with the company's current direction in terms of product.
I think your analysis of Rolex's transition to luxury watch maker is spot on, however some of us just preferred the understated tool watch look to the current blingy shiny jewellery iteration.
Oscarpapa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2018, 04:59 PM   #194
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,520
I think there is a lot of "drama" associated with owning luxury watches. Cost, maintenance, insurance, security, etc. It gets tiresome and for me, the upside isn't really worth it. I bought my Sub when prices were relatively very reasonable, discount of about 20% and service costs of $300 or less. I would never pay today's prices, in spite of being able to without serious impact. I get as much fun out of some $200 watches as my Rolex.
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.