The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 September 2019, 10:41 AM   #1
jag32
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: DC
Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN
Posts: 1,015
Just announced, AP Royal Oak Chrono 26331 is being discontinued

Just talked to a boutique trying to get a 26331 ROC and was told the boutiques we're informed yesterday by AP corporate that the current ROC is being discontinued effective 31 December 2019 and no word yet on a replacement new reference for next year. I imagine we will see a new ROC with similar design as the 15500 that will drop the word Automatic on the dial.

I don't like how automatic was removed from the 15500 dial, but it would be a welcome change on the already busy 26331 ROC dial.
jag32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 11:20 AM   #2
rallyx
"TRF" Member
 
rallyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Hans Gruber
Location: Nakatomi Plaza
Watch: Holly's Lady DJ
Posts: 315
AP must have used up their FP chrono movement inventory. I suppose this means AP is replacing the ROC with the new in-house chrono movement found in the code 11.59 and give it a new reference? So essentially it is still a ROC but a true in-house ROC.
__________________
What if Holly had on an Oysterflex?
rallyx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 12:01 PM   #3
othertbone
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by jag32 View Post
Just talked to a boutique trying to get a 26331 ROC and was told the boutiques we're informed yesterday by AP corporate that the current ROC is being discontinued effective 31 December 2019 and no word yet on a replacement new reference for next year. I imagine we will see a new ROC with similar design as the 15500 that will drop the word Automatic on the dial.

I don't like how automatic was removed from the 15500 dial, but it would be a welcome change on the already busy 26331 ROC dial.


Good news!

Why does the watch need to say automatic?
othertbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 12:08 PM   #4
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,062
I just hope they don't make it any bigger. They are definitely going with an in-house movement option.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 12:12 PM   #5
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
In house movement is a good move.
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 01:04 PM   #6
thekman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Boston
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,050
Does anyone know when AP will be releasing next year's models since they are not participating in SIHH anymore?
__________________
Rolex | AP | Cartier | VC | Lange

Follow me www.instagram.com/subs.n.scrubs
thekman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 01:29 PM   #7
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,434
if this were to be true, I'd be super excited! I had the choice between the blue dial chrono this year and the black/gray dials for the 15500. Glad I chose the latter as now I can look forward to a display caseback along with an in-house chrono movement.
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 02:04 PM   #8
SSCosmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Taipei
Posts: 294
If they use the 4401 in a new version of the ROC, it will have to be thicker. The 4401 is about 1.3mm thicker than the 2385 movement. Add a display caseback and I'm guessing the case would be somewhere between 12.5-13mm in thickness. This would be unfortunate as one of the things I like about the current ROC is that it is relatively thin at 11mm.
SSCosmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 02:15 PM   #9
kevblah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 223
The current 26331 has only been out two years, doesn’t it seem a little early for a complete discontinuation and replacement?

My guess is that they’re retaining the current movement but making some dial changes, maybe thicker hour markers like on the 15500 and completely different dial color combinations and re-releasing at a higher price point around 26-27k. The current new 38mm is 23,800, only 500 less than the 24,300 price of the 41mm. Surely a price increase was coming, maybe this is their way of doing it.
kevblah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 03:00 PM   #10
Reign
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,183
This is a bit nuts - the current version has only been out for 2 years...

Also their new flyback won’t fit in the existing ROC case so something has to give.

Curious to see what they release but not great for buyers in the past two years


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 03:04 PM   #11
duc888
"TRF" Member
 
duc888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 860
That would be good news and I hope the inhose movement will place the date window centered
duc888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 03:38 PM   #12
golfski
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: US
Watch: me whip & nay nay
Posts: 397
I was in a boutique today and was told that they were informed the Diver (which I was wearing) would no longer be delivered in its current form, though they stopped short of saying it was discontinued. I was actually looking at the PM Chrono and there was no mention of that reference going away.
golfski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 03:40 PM   #13
jumpmandk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: 1
Posts: 244
Interesting, news that I think several were waiting for!
jumpmandk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 03:48 PM   #14
steeevvvooo
"TRF" Member
 
steeevvvooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Posts: 1,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign View Post
... not great for buyers in the past two years
Because discontinued SS Rolex have fared so poorly you mean? 116710LN and BLNR popped 20-30% higher overnight when discontinued.

Lots of people recently seemed to be posting about trying to get the 26331 at list in recent months. It was possible with a little patience but not so if the watch is now discontinued.

I have a ROC though so I have a vested interest

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
__________________
Once you aquire your "grail"... then what?!
steeevvvooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 05:05 PM   #15
ChipWong
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 111
Hows the realiability and accuracy on the new chrono movement?
ChipWong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 05:26 PM   #16
Reign
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by steeevvvooo View Post
Because discontinued SS Rolex have fared so poorly you mean? 116710LN and BLNR popped 20-30% higher overnight when discontinued.

Lots of people recently seemed to be posting about trying to get the 26331 at list in recent months. It was possible with a little patience but not so if the watch is now discontinued.

I have a ROC though so I have a vested interest

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk


I have the same one you have and bought it roughly a year ago. While I’ve never sold anything, it does feel nice if things maintain value or appreciate.

Sadly, I don’t think ROC prices will hold (probably a reactionary pop) given the non in-house movement. Let’s see though!
Reign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 05:43 PM   #17
steeevvvooo
"TRF" Member
 
steeevvvooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Posts: 1,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign View Post
I have the same one you have and bought it roughly a year ago. While I’ve never sold anything, it does feel nice if things maintain value or appreciate.

Sadly, I don’t think ROC prices will hold (probably a reactionary pop) given the non in-house movement. Let’s see though!
It will be interesting to see for sure. Comments above about thickness of the code chrono has got me thinking. If the new watch (if the current model is indeed discontinued) is thicker that may work against it.

UK RRP prices were hiked 10% a few weeks ago. A new in house will surely be more expensive if the Vacheron Overseas is anything to go by. Any replacement for the ROC could be marketed in a different league to the 26331 in that case.



Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
__________________
Once you aquire your "grail"... then what?!
steeevvvooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 05:56 PM   #18
Ar_Mi
"TRF" Member
 
Ar_Mi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Dubai/Los Angeles
Watch: a few
Posts: 593
Deff going to result in increased thickness of the case, which is 11mm right now.. if it gets to 13 or so, that's not too far from the offshore. That would be weird honestly.

As for value retention or increase of the 26331 which has only been produced since 2017.. well we will have to see. the 15400 held its value very well when the 15500 hit the market. But then again that had a sublime in-house movement. the 1185 FP, although a great movement, has been used in the ROC for years, and thousands upon thousands have been produced in one form or another. Lets see, maybe the shortly lived but very much loved 26331 will be the exception.
Ar_Mi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 07:25 PM   #19
chmk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 13
getting a new 26331st blue dial in 1 week's time, which seems to trade at a slight premium on the secondary market.

non in house movement is a shame but the fp1185 is a truly legendary and thin calibre - looking forward to receiving it!. its possible discontinuation just makes it all the more special, will post pics when i receive it!
chmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 09:28 PM   #20
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSCosmo View Post
If they use the 4401 in a new version of the ROC, it will have to be thicker. The 4401 is about 1.3mm thicker than the 2385 movement. Add a display caseback and I'm guessing the case would be somewhere between 12.5-13mm in thickness. This would be unfortunate as one of the things I like about the current ROC is that it is relatively thin at 11mm.
This. The 4401 is too thick. A Roc with that and display back will but not far off the ROOs.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 10:09 PM   #21
fullofboats
"TRF" Member
 
fullofboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 528
Has anyone confirmed OP's information? Might want to double-check before we start treating this as fact
fullofboats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 10:13 PM   #22
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign View Post
I have the same one you have and bought it roughly a year ago. While I’ve never sold anything, it does feel nice if things maintain value or appreciate.

Sadly, I don’t think ROC prices will hold (probably a reactionary pop) given the non in-house movement. Let’s see though!
You never know, look at Zenith Daytona's.
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2019, 10:26 PM   #23
steeevvvooo
"TRF" Member
 
steeevvvooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Posts: 1,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullofboats View Post
Has anyone confirmed OP's information? Might want to double-check before we start treating this as fact
Fact checking?! Where is the fun in that?!?!

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
__________________
Once you aquire your "grail"... then what?!
steeevvvooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2019, 12:38 AM   #24
Collector2019
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 610
that means they will most likely fix the miss placed date window ! great news!
Collector2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2019, 01:22 AM   #25
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Collector2019 View Post
that means they will most likely fix the miss placed date window ! great news!
Unlikely as the 430 date continues on the code line

Unless you mean the off center 430 date. I think both are mistakes.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2019, 02:37 AM   #26
CoveWatch
"TRF" Member
 
CoveWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
Oh now that would be interesting... recently been really considering a 26331BA but if they're coming out with a new ref, I may just wait to see before committing. But if it were 41mm and 13mm thick and gold.. probably wouldn't work for me
CoveWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2019, 02:41 AM   #27
Collector2019
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Unlikely as the 430 date continues on the code line

Unless you mean the off center 430 date. I think both are mistakes.
yes meant it is not centered between 4 & 5. As far as I am aware they managed to fix that on the 15500 with the new movement so the window date got shifted further to the right edge, that was not possible with the older movement on 15400 etc. it could be similar case with the 26331?
Collector2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2019, 02:42 AM   #28
blacke90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: AP||Panerai||Rolex
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoveWatch View Post
Oh now that would be interesting... recently been really considering a 26331BA but if they're coming out with a new ref, I may just wait to see before committing. But if it were 41mm and 13mm thick and gold.. probably wouldn't work for me


Agree. I suspect if they put in an in-house movement either from Code or non Code, it’ll be tough to achieve the same thinnest of the FP 1185. I’m all in with the new in-house if it has the same or thinner thickness!
blacke90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2019, 02:54 AM   #29
CoveWatch
"TRF" Member
 
CoveWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by blacke90 View Post
Agree. I suspect if they put in an in-house movement either from Code or non Code, it’ll be tough to achieve the same thinnest of the FP 1185. I’m all in with the new in-house if it has the same or thinner thickness!
Definitely I actually prefer a slightly smaller size for a gold piece so the 39mm BA is actually perfect, but I just love that dial of the 41 BA chrono! It's soooo nice! And while a lot of Rolex sports are 13mm thick or around there, I think it would be too thick on a full gold piece.. for me anyway.
CoveWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2019, 03:20 AM   #30
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by blacke90 View Post
Agree. I suspect if they put in an in-house movement either from Code or non Code, it’ll be tough to achieve the same thinnest of the FP 1185. I’m all in with the new in-house if it has the same or thinner thickness!
Doubtful. There is a reason the 1185 is legendary at this price point.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.