ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mastersub · 2 May 2019, 11:22 PM

Is it just me or are the bezels on the 16800 thinner than other references? At first I just figured these to be polished/worn out examples, but as I look at more examples I'm noticing they are consistently thin. Even unpolished ones seem to have thin bezels. And by "thin bezels" I'm referring to the teeth or scalloped part of the bezel.

saskmh · 15 May 2019, 07:54 AM

The fluted part of the bezel on the 16800 is narrower than that on the previous sub models (1680, 5513, 5512, etc) It is the same however as the 16610 and five digit GMT models.

2 May 2019, 11:22 PM	#1
mastersub "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: West Coast Posts: 80	Submariner 16800 bezel thinner than others? Is it just me or are the bezels on the 16800 thinner than other references? At first I just figured these to be polished/worn out examples, but as I look at more examples I'm noticing they are consistently thin. Even unpolished ones seem to have thin bezels. And by "thin bezels" I'm referring to the teeth or scalloped part of the bezel.

15 May 2019, 07:54 AM	#2
saskmh "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 1,027	The fluted part of the bezel on the 16800 is narrower than that on the previous sub models (1680, 5513, 5512, etc) It is the same however as the 16610 and five digit GMT models. __________________ RCN (Canadian) Tudor Milsub database co-manager

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)