ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Juggernaut · 16 May 2021, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sierra2kilo

I get 114g. 16710 at 124 by comparison.

Nice...lighter than I thought....let’s just say, another box is checked for me for getting the 124270.

Thank you.

jakjuventus · 16 May 2021, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juggernaut

Nice...lighter than I thought....let’s just say, another box is checked for me for getting the 124270.

Thank you.

Just answered to ur thread.

124g for 124270 and 107g for 114270

Source from different guys and not sure how many links though.

124270 is heavier and I can definitely can feel that but mostly are from the bracelet.

Not as comfortable as 114270 with older style bracelet but you get a a feeling of modern Oyster bracelet instead. Both are unique in it own.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Brich436 · 17 May 2021, 05:49 AM

117g for the 124270 w 1 link removed.

120g with all links. ;)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

fskywalker · 17 May 2021, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brich436

117g for the 124270 w 1 link removed.

120g with all links. ;)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We need a third scale to see whether it is 120 or 124g with full links!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Juggernaut · 17 May 2021, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brich436

117g for the 124270 w 1 link removed.

120g with all links. ;)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly what I estimated....thank you!

Goose 104 · 17 May 2021, 04:43 PM

Thanks for doing this

importstunna · 17 May 2021, 05:22 PM

Wow, thank you for the great pictures and doing this. Lug to lug at 43mm, which is slightly shorter than 114270's 44mm, correct?

Are other aspects in line to say this is slightly smaller than the 114270 generation?

Brich436 · 17 May 2021, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by importstunna

Wow, thank you for the great pictures and doing this. Lug to lug at 43mm, which is slightly shorter than 114270's 44mm, correct?

Are other aspects in line to say this is slightly smaller than the 114270 generation?

43.1 but it wears much larger if you include the solid end links. I don’t have a 114270 to know those dimensions.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rossi46 · 18 May 2021, 05:02 AM

Bookmarking this thread - thank you, faz!

gnuyork · 18 May 2021, 07:13 AM

Thank you for this... looks like it's a genuine 36mm (and bit) vs what I thought I read was 35mm and change. This is good!

Juggernaut · 19 May 2021, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by importstunna

Wow, thank you for the great pictures and doing this. Lug to lug at 43mm, which is slightly shorter than 114270's 44mm, correct?

Are other aspects in line to say this is slightly smaller than the 114270 generation?

I just measured my 114270 and got 44mm lug to lug and 45mm SEL to SEL.

McDusty · 20 May 2021, 12:35 AM

Thanks.

I wonder how this compares to the 37mm Yachtmaster oyster bracelet. I think that may be slightly smaller still, perhaps 17mm or 18mm at the lugs.

I hope to see a 37mm Yachtmaster with a slightly larger bracelet closer to this size.

dannyp · 20 May 2021, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McDusty

Thanks.

I wonder how this compares to the 37mm Yachtmaster oyster bracelet. I think that may be slightly smaller still, perhaps 17mm or 18mm at the lugs.

I hope to see a 37mm Yachtmaster with a slightly larger bracelet closer to this size.

Wouldn't surprise me if the YM37 is narrower. Even though it's 1mm larger than DJ/OP/Exp 36, this one is specifically marketed towards women (based on Rolex.com watch finder).

afjag256 · 20 May 2021, 01:41 AM

Very nice and understated. This won’t be the watch for those trying to flex with a big, chunky, brightly colored, and overpriced trophy.

dannyp · 20 May 2021, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by afjag256

Very nice and understated. This won’t be the watch for those trying to flex with a big, chunky, brightly colored, and overpriced trophy.

I partially agree. Smaller watches, IMO, tend to make the wearer look larger, particularly in photos. With oversized pieces, it always looks like the watch is wearing the wearer instead of the other way around. In fact I think this may have something to do with larger, looser fitting watches becoming popular with women.

LC23 · 20 May 2021, 03:10 AM

Nice

JRique · 22 February 2024, 02:22 PM

36 is the one, super classy.

painexpert · 22 February 2024, 06:39 PM

Great info!! Thanks for your time and effort.

17 May 2021, 05:49 AM	#33
Brich436 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Brian Location: East Coast Watch: 124270 Posts: 821	117g for the 124270 w 1 link removed. 120g with all links. ;) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 16234 "Y" SS Datejust 16570 "Z" Explorer 2 116610LN "R#" Submariner 124270 "R#" Explorer 1 79030B Black Bay 58

17 May 2021, 04:43 PM	#36
Goose 104 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2019 Location: UK Watch: 126622 Posts: 884	Thanks for doing this __________________ ♛126622 Rhodium // ♛126234 Blue //♛126613LB // ♛126000 Green + more ♛ 76213 Prince Date+Day // Black Bay 58 // Black Bay Harrods // Heritage Advisor // Vertex M100 + more...

18 May 2021, 05:02 AM	#39
rossi46 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Dan Location: CT, by a lake Watch: 16570 Posts: 1,498	Bookmarking this thread - thank you, faz! __________________ A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob

22 February 2024, 06:39 PM	#48
painexpert 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Lake Titicaca Posts: 627	Great info!! Thanks for your time and effort. __________________ "No Good Deed Goes Unpunished"-Oscar Wilde "Never Allow Someone To Be Your Priority While Allowing Yourself To Be Their Option"-Mark Twain

17 May 2021, 05:22 PM	#37
importstunna "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: World Watch: BLNR Posts: 855	Wow, thank you for the great pictures and doing this. Lug to lug at 43mm, which is slightly shorter than 114270's 44mm, correct? Are other aspects in line to say this is slightly smaller than the 114270 generation?

18 May 2021, 07:13 AM	#40
gnuyork "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Marietta, GA Posts: 3,249	Thank you for this... looks like it's a genuine 36mm (and bit) vs what I thought I read was 35mm and change. This is good!

20 May 2021, 12:35 AM	#42
McDusty "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: New York Posts: 85	Thanks. I wonder how this compares to the 37mm Yachtmaster oyster bracelet. I think that may be slightly smaller still, perhaps 17mm or 18mm at the lugs. I hope to see a 37mm Yachtmaster with a slightly larger bracelet closer to this size.

20 May 2021, 01:41 AM	#44
afjag256 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: New Orleans Posts: 175	Very nice and understated. This won’t be the watch for those trying to flex with a big, chunky, brightly colored, and overpriced trophy.

20 May 2021, 03:10 AM	#46
LC23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: Up Up North Posts: 615	Nice

22 February 2024, 02:22 PM	#47
JRique "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Brazil Posts: 212	36 is the one, super classy.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)