Submariner 40 - Sea Dweller 43 - DeepSea 44

[R Douglas]

I find it curious that Rolex did the new Sea Dweller at 43mm, with the Submariner 40mm and Deepsea 44mm, the Sea Dweller should have come in at 41.5mm to 42mm and keep the 20mm bracelet, it still would be larger for the folks who want a larger size but not so big as to push away other buyers, kind of sweet spot for a size.

[And1dre]

Everyone has their own definition of sweet spot.

Haven't seen one in person yet but from what I've read and heard the Sea Dweller does not seem like a 43mm watch. Definitely interested to try it on.

[watchwatcher]

Yeah...numbers-wise, a lot of us were thinking the new SD (if released) would be in that 41-42mm range.

But, I will have to say, I don't think 43mm is going to push away as many potential buyers as you think.

[brandrea]

I can see where you're headed with this, but it truly wears smaller than 43mm IMO.

The tapered lugs and 22mm bracelet make it the perfect fit and feel at least for me

You really have to try it on to see if it's right for you.

[Nycturbovr6]

Looks great!

[kilyung]

Maybe ithe 126600 is really intended as a DSSD replacement?

[ap1]

Originally Posted by brandrea

I can see where you're headed with this, but it truly wears smaller than 43mm IMO.

The tapered lugs and 22mm bracelet make it the perfect fit and feel at least for me

You really have to try it on to see if it's right for you.

Amazing the wine doesn't spill in this pic

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by ap1

Amazing the wine doesn't spill in this pic

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk

[fishingbear]

Originally Posted by kilyung

Maybe ithe 126600 is really intended as a DSSD replacement?

^^^This is a thought that I've been surprised has not been discussed much on TRF. No one knows where Rolex will drive their diver lineup but it does make sense.

[Dyim]

DSSD represents the pinnacle of Rolex dive watch technology. I doubt it will be replaced unless something better comes out.

I tend to think of SD43 as Rolex bowing to the trend of bigger watches. I am guessing they don't have to make it 43 to accommodate the new movement.

Now there are 3 different dive watch sizes for different folks. Good way to capture more market share.

[Chewbacca]

imop, the sweet spot is how it wears, and the sd43's 43mm looks more proportional than the sub-c's 40mm

[javier]

Some president once said...."It is the wrist stupid never the watch"

[G'ed]

I thought DSSD is 43mm in actual dimension but Rolex marketed it as 44mm? Initial press kit detailed it as 43mm.

[watchwatcher]

Originally Posted by brandrea

I can see where you're headed with this, but it truly wears smaller than 43mm IMO.

The tapered lugs and 22mm bracelet make it the perfect fit and feel at least for me

You really have to try it on to see if it's right for you.

Agreed, and it looks great on you, Brian.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by watchwatcher

Agreed, and it looks great on you, Brian.

Thank you Travis

Yours looks like it's made for your wrist as well

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk

[JR16]

People pay way too much attention to mm specs marketed by Rolex and other companies. Watches 40-42mm can wear exactly the same depending on the model and brand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[eonflux]

Originally Posted by G'ed

I thought DSSD is 43mm in actual dimension but Rolex marketed it as 44mm? Initial press kit detailed it as 43mm.

Yes, the DSSD was initially advertised as a 43mm watch
My DSSD bezel measures 43 mm
I haven't seen a SD43 in person yet to compare, but from what I can see online, it may use the same bezel as the DSSD

Would make sense since it saves on production costs
The dial size and hands look the same between the DSSD and SD43 as well

The diameter of the new 3235 movement is the same as the 3135
Both 28.5 mm

[locutus49]

The real question is: why are some people on this forum so desperate for Rolex to make a larger Sub when there are DSSD and SD43 for larger wrists?

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by watchwatcher

Agreed, and it looks great on you, Brian.

Oops, Thank you Larry! I'm sure Travis will chime in

[Lemieux66]

The SD43 doesn't seem like a replacement for the DSSD as it's only similarity is that it's a Rolex dive watch of approximately the same bezel diameter.

The DSSD is a special and unique piece. The Submariner is the classic dive watch. Not really sure what the Sea-Dweller does except fill the gap between the two. Of course, you could get one just because you like it!

I heard a rumour from an AD not long ago that the DSSD will be discontinued soon, then re-released in titanium a couple of years later.

[33JS]

Originally Posted by Lemieux66

The SD43 doesn't seem like a replacement for the DSSD as it's only similarity is that it's a Rolex dive watch of approximately the same bezel diameter.

The DSSD is a special and unique piece. The Submariner is the classic dive watch. Not really sure what the Sea-Dweller does except fill the gap between the two. Of course, you could get one just because you like it!

I heard a rumour from an AD not long ago that the DSSD will be discontinued soon, then re-released in titanium a couple of years later.

I'd suggest that AD was messing with you. We're there laughs coming from the back of the shop?

And, not knowing where the archetypal tool watch that is the Rolex Seadweller sits?

The DSSD's days are numbered...

Sent from my SM-G355H using Tapatalk

[eonflux]

Originally Posted by Lemieux66

The SD43 doesn't seem like a replacement for the DSSD as it's only similarity is that it's a Rolex dive watch of approximately the same bezel diameter.

The DSSD is a special and unique piece. The Submariner is the classic dive watch. Not really sure what the Sea-Dweller does except fill the gap between the two. Of course, you could get one just because you like it!

I heard a rumour from an AD not long ago that the DSSD will be discontinued soon, then re-released in titanium a couple of years later.

DSSD would be awesome in titanium!
Should have been ti from the start...

[VicLeChic]

The SD43 is an experiment, they're trying something new and waiting to see if it's going to stick. The previous SD4K didn't work. I personally think the SD43 sits nicely between the Sub and the DSSD, has enough personality to survive and addresses the main issues from the previous model.

[stevedssd]

DSSD in Titanium now that would be interesting

[tkerrmd]

Originally Posted by R Douglas

I find it curious that Rolex did the new Sea Dweller at 43mm, with the Submariner 40mm and Deepsea 44mm, the Sea Dweller should have come in at 41.5mm to 42mm and keep the 20mm bracelet, it still would be larger for the folks who want a larger size but not so big as to push away other buyers, kind of sweet spot for a size.

personally I think it is the diver watch of Rolex diver watches and they should just stop making all the other ones

[Rags]

My sweet spot for a watch is 39-40mm. I do have on 42mm Seiko diver & I love it but I won't buy anything that large again.

[coleburns]

Originally Posted by locutus49

The real question is: why are some people on this forum so desperate for Rolex to make a larger Sub when there are DSSD and SD43 for larger wrists?

Lords knows.

[Subtiki]

Originally Posted by locutus49

The real question is: why are some people on this forum so desperate for Rolex to make a larger Sub when there are DSSD and SD43 for larger wrists?

I think personally, because some people like the looks of the Sub. The clean bezel, no date clean look. The SD43 looks ok, but could do without the cyclops and the busy bezel. I would love a Sub no date in a 42.
They should have two or three sizes
Small for women
Regular 40 for purist
Large 42 do larger men.

[G'ed]

All these while I thought DSSD was too big for my 6.5-6.75in. Glad I give it a go. It's my fav diver bar none. I owned SubC, SD4K and AP Royal Oak diver.

This is the only production Rolex without cyclop now. Long live the Beast.

[Ruud Van Driver]

Originally Posted by G'ed

All these while I thought DSSD was too big for my 6.5-6.75in. Glad I give it a go. It's my fav diver bar none. I owned SubC, SD4K and AP Royal Oak diver.

This is the only production Rolex without cyclop now. Long live the Beast.

Long live the D-Blue Beast