ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 May 2012, 10:41 PM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
Quote:
On why they decided to do away with a 39mm for the modern RO reiteration... I'd say to milk the cow till its dry... |
|
12 May 2012, 04:26 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Quote:
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
12 May 2012, 06:09 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
|
12 May 2012, 06:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
That sounds a bit odd, I would think they would take those working on the 15300 and put them on the 15400.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.