ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 June 2015, 09:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Ceramic diver dial
Hi all,
I've just read that the ceramic diver dial is not tapisserie as most, but is instead stamped, does anyone know about this, Won't stop me from getting mine but I thought it was tapisserie dial, when you look at pics you see it's different than the FC diver dial for example. |
16 June 2015, 10:26 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: JF
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680
Posts: 1,426
|
I am not sure how the dial on the Ceramic is made but it looks better than the dial on the FC. I had the previous version (non-display back) of the SS Diver which had the same dial as the FC.
I thought the dial looked kind of sloppy. For some reason the combination of the engine turned concentric circles when juxtaposed with the waffle squares, the edges of the squares look crooked. The Ceramic dial looks a bit more "sterile" but cleaner, like the dials they use in the 44MM and the latest 42MM ROOs and I prefer it. |
16 June 2015, 01:34 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,875
|
Yeah you don't see the texture on the dial that exists with 15202/15300/15400. I would rather have that beautful texture because it evokes craftsmanship to anyone who has seen the dial making process. That said, I can forgive because it's a great package.
|
16 June 2015, 10:02 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Florida
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 156
|
I believe all Offshore dials are stamped; for tapisserie you have to buy the original Royal Oak.
|
16 June 2015, 10:13 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: .
Watch: AP 15703 & PP 5990
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
definately looks stamped for the ceramic in hi-res photos http://professionalwatches.com/asset...1769-24193.jpg also noticed it in the 15710st http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=407583 But my 15703 Diver's dial is definately made using a pantograph. macro dial comparison |
|
17 June 2015, 12:36 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
|
|
17 June 2015, 01:13 AM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,520
|
definitely more sporty without the texture, which is appropriate for the ceramic diver.
|
17 June 2015, 01:21 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 1,791
|
Yes, the dial of ceramic and FC are different. Personally, I find the stamped mega tapisserie dial looks more clean-cut and modern which suits the RO Offshore better. For petit and grand tapisserie dials, engine-turned is the only way for me
|
17 June 2015, 01:39 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: JF
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680
Posts: 1,426
|
|
20 June 2015, 09:59 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 232
|
That is correct, the dials which do not have fine texture (most modern offshores except 15703 and fc diver) are made using a stamping technique rather than cut on a pantograph.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.