ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

AAMD11 · 27 February 2012, 11:18 AM

Just checking on our accuracies. Mine is doing very well. Some days it runs spot on other it gains 4 seconds a day, others it loses 2 seconds a day. How about yours?

Spikedlee · 27 February 2012, 11:29 AM

My old SMP co-ax was about +10 seconds per day which I wasn't too pleased with. My Bond Chrono w/ 7750 keeps way better time at -1 seconds per day

SynMike · 27 February 2012, 11:41 AM

My 2500C Planet Ocean varies just a little bit. I guess it probably has some variance based on whether I wear it or keep it in the box and if I leave it sitting longer so that power reserve starts to run down (I rarely leave it long enough to let it stop). But it always runs anywhere from -2s/day to +1s/day. With a little bit of that back and forth on my wrist and in the box it is generally within a couple of seconds over the course of a week.

Dan2010 · 27 February 2012, 11:56 AM

Currently my PO2500 runs 1.4 seconds a day fast.

FeelingTheBlues · 27 February 2012, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan2010

Currently my PO2500 runs 1.4 seconds a day fast.

That's quite a good rate!

ShortyB · 27 February 2012, 12:39 PM

Not very accurate.
My PO2500 will gain 2 seconds over night. The problem is when it is worn. After 8 hours on my wrist the watch will gain 2 plus minutes.

warrior · 27 February 2012, 01:06 PM

I've had many coaxial watches...from 2500 POs to Bonds to ATs. They've all been very accurate....all 0.5 seconds to +3 seconds per day.

AAMD11 · 27 February 2012, 01:55 PM

Two days ago my watch ran 4 seconds fast, I reset it and the last 24 hours 2 seconds fast. I guess it depends on how you wear it.

Dan2010 · 27 February 2012, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FeelingTheBlues

That's quite a good rate!

I'm happy with it. It's the first watch I have owned that was actually fast. All my others have been a second or two slow.

With what seems like all the 2500 Co Axial hating on the internet, I am expecting my watch to spontanously combust on my wrist at any time.............

FeelingTheBlues · 27 February 2012, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan2010

I'm happy with it. It's the first watch I have owned that was actually fast. All my others have been a second or two slow.

With what seems like all the 2500 Co Axial hating on the internet, I am expecting my watch to spontanously combust on my wrist at any time.............

Well it's okay, it's a divers' watch! You can put your burning wrist in the water without any risk of damaging the piece!

bcacncnc · 27 February 2012, 10:42 PM

My 2500c is very accurate. Whilst I hv never timed it, compared with my panerais it is much more accurate.

clarencek · 27 February 2012, 10:48 PM

My 9300 is very consistent at +2 per day

buddy13 · 27 February 2012, 11:27 PM

My two 2500D's (SMP-C and PO 42mm) are almost exactly +2 secs. each...

I had 5 co-axial Omegas and they have always mightily impressed me in this department

. State of wind and positional variation does not seem to affect these watches as much as others...

esm · 27 February 2012, 11:32 PM

not bad.

i have never missed a train/flight or a meeting. so that must be good enough for me

qwiklap · 28 February 2012, 12:49 AM

One of the best timekeepers in my collection.

The neck-and-neck with the Seiko movement in my Prometheus.

Dweller of the Sea · 28 February 2012, 01:11 AM

I have owned several, all has kept time within cosc.

My oldest co-axial is a caliber 3313 which for 10 years is still keeping +2 sec/day, as it did when I bought it.
Never been regulated or serviced

The best is my new POC 9300 which is about 0.75 sec/day

mboverst · 28 February 2012, 01:44 AM

I've taken in around 75 the past year and the WORST was keeping +10 seconds per day with 95%+ keeping within COSC.

Most of those being 2500's...I don't know where these 'faulty' 2500's are, but I've never come across one.

swiss ghost · 28 February 2012, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShortyB

Not very accurate.
My PO2500 will gain 2 seconds over night. The problem is when it is worn. After 8 hours on my wrist the watch will gain 2 plus minutes.

2 plus min after 8 hrs?

sounds magnetized and way way way way way way out of chrometer specs. time to take to omega for some warranty work if indeed still under warranty.

gaining 2 min after 8hrs is unacceptable

GEO_79 · 28 February 2012, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShortyB

Not very accurate.
My PO2500 will gain 2 seconds over night. The problem is when it is worn. After 8 hours on my wrist the watch will gain 2 plus minutes.

are you happy with that?

TswaneNguni · 28 February 2012, 02:00 PM

PLOPROF is +0.5s day.One of the most accurate watches I have owned.Equals my ex-Daytonas in accuracy.

AAMD11 · 28 February 2012, 09:28 PM

update, yesterday it was +2 sec a day, today its -2 sec a day haha, weird

Dedot · 28 February 2012, 09:44 PM

I have an AT 38.5mm (8500) which was purchased almost a year ago and it runs about -2 sec/day, crown up position.

Mystro · 28 February 2012, 11:26 PM

My 2500 PO has been documented to be + or - 0 seconds in 38 days. More accurate than my quartz. this was 2 years ago. It still is more accurate than any automatic I know of.

padi56 · 28 February 2012, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swiss ghost

2 plus min after 8 hrs?

sounds magnetized and way way way way way way out of chrometer specs. time to take to omega for some warranty work if indeed still under warranty.

gaining 2 min after 8hrs is unacceptable

If it gains only two seconds while off wrist over night why do you think its magnetised.A magnetised watch cannot tell whether its day of night,and in general a magnetised watch will run erratic all of the time day and night.

ShortyB · 29 February 2012, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swiss ghost

2 plus min after 8 hrs?

sounds magnetized and way way way way way way out of chrometer specs. time to take to omega for some warranty work if indeed still under warranty.

gaining 2 min after 8hrs is unacceptable

Omega has the watch as we speak......3rd time.

27 February 2012, 11:18 AM	#1
AAMD11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Illusive Man Location: NYC Watch: Omega Worldtimer Posts: 599	How accurate is your Co-Axial Just checking on our accuracies. Mine is doing very well. Some days it runs spot on other it gains 4 seconds a day, others it loses 2 seconds a day. How about yours? __________________

27 February 2012, 01:55 PM	#8
AAMD11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Illusive Man Location: NYC Watch: Omega Worldtimer Posts: 599	Two days ago my watch ran 4 seconds fast, I reset it and the last 24 hours 2 seconds fast. I guess it depends on how you wear it. __________________

27 February 2012, 10:42 PM	#11
bcacncnc "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Bryan Location: Hong Kong Posts: 1,577	My 2500c is very accurate. Whilst I hv never timed it, compared with my panerais it is much more accurate. __________________ Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko

27 February 2012, 10:48 PM	#12
clarencek "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: New York Posts: 400	My 9300 is very consistent at +2 per day __________________ Citizen AQ4020-54X, NB6005-05L, NB6006-02X, Casio GMW-B5000TFC, MRG-B5000B, MTG-B1000XB, Hamilton Field Khaki H70605731, IWC IW356501, IWC387902, Longines Spirit L3.810.4.93.0, MKII PMWF Graywater GMT, Project 300, Omega 210.92.42.20.01.001, 304.33.44.52.03.001, Rolex 116400GV, 116520, 116610LV, 126600, 326933, Seiko SBGA001, SLA019, Sinn U1-ST

28 February 2012, 12:49 AM	#15
qwiklap "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: CT Location: Scottsdale, AZ Watch: Rolex 16710 Pepsi Posts: 157	One of the best timekeepers in my collection. The neck-and-neck with the Seiko movement in my Prometheus. __________________ Rolex Sub LV "The Hulk" Rolex Exp II Black (42mm) Rolex GMT Master II (Pepsi and Coke) Omega Planet Ocean XL (Orange Bezel on Black Rubber) Prometheus Jellyfish (Blue) & G-Shock Wave Ceptor (<-- most accurate of the bunch)

27 February 2012, 11:29 AM	#2
Spikedlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Chicago, IL Watch: Too many to narrow Posts: 585	My old SMP co-ax was about +10 seconds per day which I wasn't too pleased with. My Bond Chrono w/ 7750 keeps way better time at -1 seconds per day

27 February 2012, 11:41 AM	#3
SynMike Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 72	My 2500C Planet Ocean varies just a little bit. I guess it probably has some variance based on whether I wear it or keep it in the box and if I leave it sitting longer so that power reserve starts to run down (I rarely leave it long enough to let it stop). But it always runs anywhere from -2s/day to +1s/day. With a little bit of that back and forth on my wrist and in the box it is generally within a couple of seconds over the course of a week.

27 February 2012, 11:56 AM	#4
Dan2010 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: South Carolina Watch: Panerai 914 Posts: 6,540	Currently my PO2500 runs 1.4 seconds a day fast.

27 February 2012, 12:39 PM	#6
ShortyB "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: SoCal Watch: 116600 Posts: 74	Not very accurate. My PO2500 will gain 2 seconds over night. The problem is when it is worn. After 8 hours on my wrist the watch will gain 2 plus minutes.

27 February 2012, 01:06 PM	#7
warrior "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: massachusetts Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,667	I've had many coaxial watches...from 2500 POs to Bonds to ATs. They've all been very accurate....all 0.5 seconds to +3 seconds per day.

27 February 2012, 11:27 PM	#13
buddy13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Etienne Location: Malta Watch: Orient star 300m Posts: 724	My two 2500D's (SMP-C and PO 42mm) are almost exactly +2 secs. each... I had 5 co-axial Omegas and they have always mightily impressed me in this department . State of wind and positional variation does not seem to affect these watches as much as others...

27 February 2012, 11:32 PM	#14
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	not bad. i have never missed a train/flight or a meeting. so that must be good enough for me

28 February 2012, 01:11 AM	#16
Dweller of the Sea "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: EU Watch: ing TRF Posts: 576	I have owned several, all has kept time within cosc. My oldest co-axial is a caliber 3313 which for 10 years is still keeping +2 sec/day, as it did when I bought it. Never been regulated or serviced The best is my new POC 9300 which is about 0.75 sec/day

28 February 2012, 01:44 AM	#17
mboverst "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Matt Location: Dallas Posts: 1,683	I've taken in around 75 the past year and the WORST was keeping +10 seconds per day with 95%+ keeping within COSC. Most of those being 2500's...I don't know where these 'faulty' 2500's are, but I've never come across one.

28 February 2012, 02:00 PM	#20
TswaneNguni "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: . Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs Posts: 12,608	PLOPROF is +0.5s day.One of the most accurate watches I have owned.Equals my ex-Daytonas in accuracy.

28 February 2012, 09:28 PM	#21
AAMD11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Illusive Man Location: NYC Watch: Omega Worldtimer Posts: 599	update, yesterday it was +2 sec a day, today its -2 sec a day haha, weird __________________

28 February 2012, 09:44 PM	#22
Dedot "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Australia Posts: 197	I have an AT 38.5mm (8500) which was purchased almost a year ago and it runs about -2 sec/day, crown up position.

28 February 2012, 11:26 PM	#23
Mystro 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 14,799	My 2500 PO has been documented to be + or - 0 seconds in 38 days. More accurate than my quartz. this was 2 years ago. It still is more accurate than any automatic I know of.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)