ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 June 2017, 08:40 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
|
Seiko SLA017 -- the first diver
What do you all think about this watch? I'm not especially interested in vintage Seiko, but it does seem cool -- the reasonable 40mm diameter is also nice, considering the size of most Seiko divers. Would definitely like to grab one of these
https://monochrome-watches.com/seiko...-review-price/ |
27 June 2017, 09:18 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
I have to agree with the comments in the linked review – the price is unjustified, even if you prefer it more than the MarineMaster 300.
|
27 June 2017, 09:25 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: HK/Malaysia
Watch: Lover
Posts: 1,222
|
It's a great watch Steve...glad to see fellow forumers appreciate a good watch which is not your everyday Seiko. But as stated, I would not spend this kind of money for this either. I love everything about this watch except for the price. I'd rather grab a GS for this money.
|
27 June 2017, 09:43 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Nice, although a tad expensive and I prefer a larger size. I would either go up to a GS model, or down to a less expensive Seiko.
__________________
|
27 June 2017, 09:50 PM | #5 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,504
|
If money wasn't an issue I would have jumped to get one immediately. Go for it if you can!
|
28 June 2017, 12:46 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
I am a buyer at 1500. Over that no thanks. And a unregulated 8l35 for that price is a no go.
|
28 June 2017, 01:31 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,215
|
I agree with the comments above. It's a great looking watch but too expensive at that price.
|
28 June 2017, 01:43 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
|
28 June 2017, 02:19 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
It's gorgeous.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
28 June 2017, 02:28 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Posts: 123
|
I would just like share my story on this piece. I made a reservation for this I believe is a limited edition to 2000pcs. Anyway yes it is a bit overpriced for the movement somewhat closed to GS movement. But in the end whatever sings to me is important, neither reasonable nor overly priced Seiko. It is what it is, this is what we live for.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
..it never ends .. " ang relo ni leroy ay Rolex " •• 16570 •• 114060 •• |
28 June 2017, 02:30 AM | #11 | |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,504
|
Quote:
If accuracy is not as pleased out of the box I would just get it regulated, yeah it's a trip to a watchmaker, so what. |
|
28 June 2017, 06:50 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 548
|
Re:
I picked up mine today! Having had two 62MAS previously, this one is a no-brainer for me.
Quote:
|
|
28 June 2017, 07:55 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
|
Absolutely love this, but yea I couldn't spend that over like a Black Bay or Speedmaster.
I would probably be a buyer at $1.5k, and definitely around $1k. |
28 June 2017, 08:43 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: One Degree North
Posts: 340
|
Nice looks stunning
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 June 2017, 09:17 PM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,957
|
Good looking watch but I would not get into any vintage Seiko's or others that demand a premium for purchase. I have been playing with the Seiko's for a few years now and I currently own a modern Turtle on the Rubber strap. For what it is, I think it is a great beater and keeps almost perfect time. You should be able to find some great Seiko's for around $300.00 give or take a little.
|
28 June 2017, 10:06 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure the retail price of the 62 MAS SLA017 would be in the range of USD 3000-3200 in Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok or Jakarta. It would be a tad more expensive in Singapore though. So if you are interested or a die hard Seiko fan ,my advice to you is to purchase this LE watch here |
|
29 June 2017, 12:32 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,883
|
Looks great. I wish GS divers had those hands. I can't get comfortable with the imo over stylized hands they use.
|
29 June 2017, 01:12 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Nice watch, but too expensive for what it is.
|
29 June 2017, 09:46 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Har
Location: Tukwila, WA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,569
|
I'll definitely get this one! It fits my parameter - a reissue, a diver and a smaller case size. To each his own as they say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Go for the timepiece you love. You will save more. ... |
29 June 2017, 10:15 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Northern VA
Watch: 126711, 126610
Posts: 1,803
|
Agree it should be priced around the MM300, which I own. I can't imagine paying what they're asking.
|
29 June 2017, 06:07 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,593
|
I like it very much & was only looking at the review pictures of it yesterday evening . Bit overpriced ,but being a LE no doubt it will sell out pretty soon, given there are lots of Seiko lovers out there including me . I think the price in Europe will be about €3800 = £3344 = $4343 at current exchange rates which will probably price me out .
|
29 June 2017, 06:43 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 108
|
good but way overpriced.. I wouldn't pay 200$ for it which is what I paid for my last Seiko Kinetic diver which had issues getting to full charge
|
29 June 2017, 07:14 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: -
Posts: 988
|
Would love one but at that price I'll stick to my MM300. Annoying.
|
29 June 2017, 07:15 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,593
|
I agree , forget Kinetic. The SKX007 is the one to go for in my view, just about bulletproof and if it ever breaks down just buy another
|
29 June 2017, 07:44 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
|
Nice watch but I prefer Seiko 5 diver models
__________________
|
29 June 2017, 07:49 PM | #26 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
|
Quote:
Quote:
I still want one. I just want to handle this watch in person first |
||
29 June 2017, 08:23 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,068
|
Nice.
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
29 June 2017, 09:59 PM | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
|
Quote:
Want to hear a story?A local Chinese seller here had made 2 pre order online bookings for the Seiko.When I asked him why two, he simply said he'll keep one and flip the second for a profit so that's a Win-Win situation ! Is the asking price for 'the ugly dolphin' justifiable? Perhaps not, but that's exactly why this timepiece might yet be Seiko's most important triumph card to break consumers 'cheap seiko mentality' This is Seiko's 1st ever Diving Watch, the Grand Daddy and the prototype of all future G of divers and deservingly so to be tagged at a premium.Dont like it Sir ? No problem.Just move along and some0ne else will gladly grab your spot. 1# Do you remember Omega's LE Speedy Tuesday Speedmaster ?That watch generated such an overwhelming response beyond expectations that all 2012 units were sold out in 4 hours ! And each Speedy Tuesday is a cool USD6.5 G 2 # Do you know which timepiece in Baselworld 2017 recorded the highest number of readers comments (both negative and positives)on twitter and watch blogsites? Was it the Rolex Red Sea Dweller Ref 126600 ? Dont be ridiculous.The answer is the Seiko Prospex Diver SLA 017.Of course it doesnt prove anything but every watch aficionados and bargain hunters alike seeking for a vintage reissue are giving this watch some serious consideration Correct me if I'm wrong but isnt the SLA 017 is the second cheapest vintage reissue after Benjamin Clymer of Hodinkee Longines Heritage 45 ? |
|
30 June 2017, 12:19 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Posts: 123
|
Quote:
Hello Meganfox, I couldn't agree with you more. Your observations were spot on. It is true that Seiko has been and always a favorite for critics, and onlookers alike for they have a vastly extensive lineup of watches from $100+ SKX to $10,000+ GS. Seiko caters a variety of enthusiasts, collectors and people who doesn't really care at all just for the sake of wearing a watch. With regards to Seiko, from their very reasonably priced watch (which I don't want to call them cheap ) to their most expensive lineup they always use in-house movement and yet Seiko was still being branded as a "not so ok" watch as opposed to the big boys of the industry, which I don't mind at all. Seiko will always be a Seiko that most people will always admire and love. A brand with a solid history and quality with their timepieces. In the end fairly priced or not, I will buy the watch that I think is worth buying and suits my budget. Not just because people say this or that, but because I like it and I want to own one. I would just like to share as well the story of my Tudor BBN, which I bought awhile back, people say it is not worthy granted that it houses a ETA. For me that is the beauty of it. It will add up to the history of the watch. Imagine 30+ plus years from now when people will start talking about the watch who ones used a ETA and had a limited production time. Will it be worthy? Who nows right? But still I bought it because There is a need for wanting it. Just let me know if I can help make some arrangements if you are interested with the Seiko SLA. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
..it never ends .. " ang relo ni leroy ay Rolex " •• 16570 •• 114060 •• |
|
30 June 2017, 09:52 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Har
Location: Tukwila, WA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,569
|
Seiko SLA017 -- the first diver
Hi Meganfox and Surefire,
Both of your comments are definitely spot on. Indeed beauty is in the eye of the beholder. We seek for things that we think are of value to us. No one can compel us, and definitely we are not obligated to listen, heed, or follow opinions of others, be it favorable or adverse. We the buyer will always make the final decision. For me, I never had a Seiko watch before, even when I was growing up. The closest that I got was an Alba watch, and at that time I wear my Alba watch proudly. But deep inside me, I always wanted a Seiko, but not just getting a Seiko for the sake of getting one. The Seiko that I would get must appeal to me first, pricing being secondary. Finally, I'm happy to pull the trigger on both the Grand Seiko 253 and the SLA017. Love those two reissue models, also fit my collection parameters, and most of all, finally was able to get the Seiko that is a beauty to me. Have a great weekend! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Go for the timepiece you love. You will save more. ... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.