ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
24 January 2020, 11:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 434
|
Aside from the fauxtina, I think the 321 is more appealing in almost every way. Far and away the most iconic chronograph of all time. Much better looking, too, imo.
|
25 January 2020, 06:25 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Watch: GMT IIc and PO
Posts: 1,638
|
|
25 January 2020, 05:15 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Great White North
Posts: 696
|
|
24 January 2020, 12:13 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 18
|
Really like the bracelet. Is it available on any of their other references?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
24 January 2020, 12:43 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Eastwest
Posts: 1,322
|
Quote:
Agree. Omega can’t compare/compete with Rolex....maybe they can compete with Tudor, Tag, Seiko.....but never Rolex! |
|
24 January 2020, 01:49 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,034
|
Quote:
The butterfly type clasp may or may not be the same on the new release?
__________________
|
|
24 January 2020, 01:57 PM | #7 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
|
Quote:
I just hate that they didn't do this in hesalite. That's a huge letdown. Irrespective of price, it has a lot of misses in my book. |
|
24 January 2020, 10:21 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,034
|
Quote:
Regarding the hesalite, also agree it is desirable. The hesalite is worlds apart in beauty and there is zero question for me which I prefer... but I dig sapphire for its quality of durability and find some joy in not having to deal with a scratch across the plexi. In the end, I would say you can bank on omega releasing a hesalite version of the 321 to follow.
__________________
|
|
6 February 2020, 02:46 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
|
|
24 January 2020, 02:24 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Milgauss / GMT II
Posts: 464
|
$10,000 up charge for 321 movement and ceramic bezel is insane.
__________________
. Rolex Milgauss Black GV / Rolex GMT II Slate Serti Rolex 2-Line Submariner / Bell & Ross 03-94 RS17 Breitling SOH II - Brown 42 / Breitling 806 Re-Edition |
24 January 2020, 03:02 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 210
|
The 321 is pretty nice, but if I was going to spend (relative) megabucks on a Speedmaster, it would be the Racing Master Chronometer. Not quite the same look as a traditional Speedy, but a thoroughly modern take with a beast movement.
|
24 January 2020, 03:21 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: miami
Watch: GMT II 16760
Posts: 1,676
|
I love my vintage Speedy but have given up on Omega due to it's dumb lazy upper management. If Brand and value destruction were an Olympic event they would be gold medalists.
Compare that to the upper management of Rolex. 30 second first round KO. My choice given they're the same price- Daytona even if I can't tell time with it. Will be happy to get my Speedy some family companionship when Omega gets their sh^t together. |
24 January 2020, 03:33 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,590
|
I'm not a fan of Chronos but I think Omega finally managed to make a good looking bracelet. Of course, it had to be a copy from Rolex's Oyster with a twist. Watch looks good, price is not.
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible. |
24 January 2020, 05:22 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: 5970
Posts: 1,980
|
Gus I agree with every one of your comments 100%.
Looking forward to the 321! |
24 January 2020, 05:28 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 250
|
what about this one?
the most underrated chrono from 2019, and my absolute favorite
|
24 January 2020, 08:47 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,594
|
|
25 January 2020, 05:40 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
|
|
26 January 2020, 04:39 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,034
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
25 January 2020, 06:17 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex DD
Posts: 306
|
Much prefer the Speedmaster. I love Rolex, but for chronograph Speedy is what I would buy. And SS Daytona market prices make zero sense to me.
|
26 January 2020, 06:43 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
|
I’ve had both speedmasters and Daytona’s and at mrsp and if it was possible to get these at mrsp I’d pick the Daytona of the 2. It’s a slightly poor comparison given that for the vast majority a Daytona can only be picked up at a vast percentage over mrsp. I like the new 321 but when you start to go over £11k for a steel speedy it’s a harder sell, and one where you really need to appreciate the movement, history etc to see the value.
I have 2 speedies currently including the Apollo 11 50th. If you take the Apollo 11, it has the new movement, sapphire, one of the best bracelet/clasp combos I’ve ever worn, ceramic bezel and gold bezel, hands etc and a sapphire case back with the footprint underneath. I struggle to think I’d spend another £4k on the 321, and it makes that one look pretty good value in my eyes. In fact if the Apollo 11 had 100m water resistance, it’s that one I’d take over the Daytona. |
28 January 2020, 05:33 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Great White North
Posts: 696
|
For those concerned about the value proposition of the Omega Speedmaster 321, I fixed it for you:
|
28 January 2020, 06:18 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: home
Posts: 43
|
|
28 January 2020, 08:58 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Great White North
Posts: 696
|
|
28 January 2020, 09:08 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
|
31 January 2020, 02:16 PM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,225
|
Quote:
Same point as my post! |
|
28 January 2020, 05:58 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,654
|
Epic pic! Loving the Version 4.1.6 of the black bezel and Watsamadder thin-lumed hands.
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
28 January 2020, 09:01 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
I want both, I'll only be able to get one of them at RRP.
|
28 January 2020, 02:31 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Australia
Watch: Speedy and Pepsi
Posts: 168
|
I'm sold on the 321.
Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk |
6 February 2020, 01:05 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: SD43
Posts: 447
|
If I could get the white Daytona at MSRP I would, in part because it's hard to get, and in part because it's a good chrono and I never owned one. Everyone knows that you'll get your cash out of that watch if you buy it at MSRP. If I didn't have the cash, I'd sell something else to get in on one of these. I'd never buy one grey...not a proponent of that stream of thinking.
I have always gravitated more towards stealth watches so the c321 is ideal for me from that perspective. It's one of the watches where it's probably best to imagine that resale is going to be harder (at least slower) than a Daytona, so I think if I got one I'd assume that I'm keeping it for an extended period. There's no detail on it that bugs me...I really like how it turned out. If they offered a c321-powered 105.012 or 145.012 with Hesalite and a steel caseback instead, I don't know if I'd jump out and get it. It somehow feels too much like my regular c861 SpeedyPro. |
13 February 2020, 11:33 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: pa
Posts: 313
|
The new 321 will be a handmade movement by one person as well as the rest of the watch. Where can you buy a handmade watch of this quality for less then the asking price. There is already a surplus of people paying 10 k for an original beat up speedy with the 321 and new one has a better bracelet, nicer finishing on the movement etc. This watch will restricted to something like a 1000 per year, the price is fair.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.