ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

FanFromLakeMary · 22 November 2007, 03:37 PM

Looking for an honest opinion on David Yurman watches. I saw the one pictured, called the Belmont, at a David Yurman retail store at the mall.

Picture taken from their website. Also from their website:

Movement:
• Swiss automatic self-winding chronograph, ETA 2894-2.

jordo9998 · 23 November 2007, 05:51 AM

nice watch but IMO i think it's more of a style high fashion watch that will not be a
"time less" design unlike Rolex's.. they last forever or Patek,or RogerDubuis,Cartier,Breitling,ect ect..

If you just like the watch for what it is and have money to throw around then buy it and plan on dumping the watch in 3-5 years.. those style bracelets do not hold up well over years to come, it will need replacing if they still even make that style watch by then..

When it comes to watches i only buy sure things, I look at it as an investment and I can at the same time have fun with.

sharp looking watch in any case.

cheers.

Spencer · 23 November 2007, 09:38 AM

I like the look, and like their jewelry, but Cartier aside, I say leave the watch buying to watch companies, and not jewelry manufacturers. Just my humble opinion.

krlyuzh · 23 November 2007, 01:02 PM

don't get it. just TRUST my words.

FanFromLakeMary · 24 November 2007, 01:05 PM

Thanks for the feedback - I'm of the same opinion that David Yurman is a jeweler not a watch company - just wanted to hear if anybody had some other experience.

jordo9998 · 25 November 2007, 10:15 AM

come to think of it i know where i have seen this watch before... it looks just like the kenneth cole watch i saw. haha

FanFromLakeMary · 26 November 2007, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jordo9998

come to think of it i know where i have seen this watch before... it looks just like the kenneth cole watch i saw. haha

True - and it costs like $4k

23 November 2007, 09:38 AM	#3
Spencer "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: US Posts: 1,338	I like the look, and like their jewelry, but Cartier aside, I say leave the watch buying to watch companies, and not jewelry manufacturers. Just my humble opinion. __________________ I'm a perpetual kind of guy Resident Audemars Piguet Fanatic

23 November 2007, 05:51 AM	#2
jordo9998 Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 118	nice watch but IMO i think it's more of a style high fashion watch that will not be a "time less" design unlike Rolex's.. they last forever or Patek,or RogerDubuis,Cartier,Breitling,ect ect.. If you just like the watch for what it is and have money to throw around then buy it and plan on dumping the watch in 3-5 years.. those style bracelets do not hold up well over years to come, it will need replacing if they still even make that style watch by then.. When it comes to watches i only buy sure things, I look at it as an investment and I can at the same time have fun with. sharp looking watch in any case. cheers.

23 November 2007, 01:02 PM	#4
krlyuzh 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Kirill Location: USA Posts: 11,867	don't get it. just TRUST my words.

24 November 2007, 01:05 PM	#5
FanFromLakeMary Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: FL Posts: 73	Thanks for the feedback - I'm of the same opinion that David Yurman is a jeweler not a watch company - just wanted to hear if anybody had some other experience.

25 November 2007, 10:15 AM	#6
jordo9998 Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 118	come to think of it i know where i have seen this watch before... it looks just like the kenneth cole watch i saw. haha

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)