ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

aksd · 21 March 2019, 01:45 AM

To throw a spanner into the mix, I'm thinking Breitlings look a whole lot more interesting this year, especially the 806 1959 re-issue

Wrist Watcher · 21 March 2019, 01:45 AM

Not sure Omega is laughing at Rolex, but I do love my SMP!

RTG · 21 March 2019, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern

Omega... might ass well buy a Tissot.

Well said! Omega goes to sleep and dreams about being Rolex.

strafer_kid · 21 March 2019, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandpit

What a ridiculous thing to say

Was just wondering myself about that comment. Not sure what the problem is with Omega?

darkside7 · 21 March 2019, 01:58 AM

They can laugh when they overtake Rolex in sales.

richard371 · 21 March 2019, 02:01 AM

I realy like this watch. Bang for the buck better then a sub and can be obtained

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrist Watcher

Not sure Omega is laughing at Rolex, but I do love my SMP!

richard371 · 21 March 2019, 02:02 AM

Is the bezel insert ceramic?

Quote:

Originally Posted by richard371

I realy like this watch. Bang for the buck better then a sub and can be obtained

Wrist Watcher · 21 March 2019, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by richard371

I realy like this watch. Bang for the buck better then a sub and can be obtained

Thanks! I agree that it's a better buy from a value standpoint. I love both the SMP and the Sub, however, for different reasons.

Quote:

Originally Posted by richard371

Is the bezel insert ceramic?

Yes.

2nastie · 21 March 2019, 02:28 AM

Are you sure it's not the other way around. Omega brings "fancy" new models and probably gets the same reception as the previous years...

Rolex makes little tweaks and spits out stuff we don't want yet their older models will now be selling quicker and more than ever... meanwhile their "new" lineup picks off the individuals who just wants a Rolex or those who want to say they have the newest thing.

Pretty ingenious. Does nothing, yet increases value and demand on their watches.

Props to Rolex.

904VT · 21 March 2019, 02:32 AM

Lol Omega is not laughing and I'm sure Rolex isn't worried at all. If anything Omega is worried about Tudor.

Doesn't mean I'm happy about it, and the approach. But Rolex compared to this year's Omega releases will not be out of date next year anyway, so what's the point with Omega and so many updates.

Boba Fett · 21 March 2019, 02:32 AM

So your average guy decides to buy a watch to celebrate something. He walks into Rolex store "I'd like to buy a chronograph or a GMT please".
"Yes sir we have these in precious metal or you can wait ten years for one in steel"
Man laughs assuming it's a joke as the GMT is on the cover of the catalogue and in lots of advertising.
After being told this is not a joke he leaves.
Next door in omega....

dtwer · 21 March 2019, 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cabaiguan

Right because Rolex models that people want are so accessible?

At least you can walk into an AD or OB and actually get a desirable model and walk out the door with it THAT DAY. Rolex may be the more coveted brand-name but most people (not us) wanting a timepiece don't want to wait years to put something on their wrist. Swatch, Richemont and others are no doubt taking the customers that Rolex refuses to service. That's a fact.

I think that depends on what "people" you are referring to. For the WIS who want very specific, more tool-like references among all the Rolex offerings, accessibility may be difficult.

The problem is, the WIS are a small minority among Rolex's existing and potential customers.

For the broader consumer base that wants Rolexes, they can still walk in an AD and get a nice YM, DJ, DD or OP in various configurations. To them, it's the Rolex crown that matters, not the specs.

greywolf617 · 21 March 2019, 02:38 AM

Nice! I like the wave dial.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrist Watcher

Not sure Omega is laughing at Rolex, but I do love my SMP!

reddog4063 · 21 March 2019, 02:38 AM

does anyone know when IWC announces? I hope they come out a winner.

Sub King · 21 March 2019, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boba Fett

So your average guy decides to buy a watch to celebrate something. He walks into Rolex store "I'd like to buy a chronograph or a GMT please".
"Yes sir we have these in precious metal or you can wait ten years for one in steel"
Man laughs assuming it's a joke as the GMT is on the cover of the catalogue and in lots of advertising.
After being told this is not a joke he leaves.
Next door in omega....

Well said

johneh · 21 March 2019, 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RTG

Well said! Omega goes to sleep and dreams about being Rolex.

Ha! I highly doubt it. Rolex is becoming a joke. I get it, you're clearly a fan boy judging by your signature, but try opening your eyes to something else.

Omega is turning things around, while Rolex seems to enjoy pissing on your head and telling you it's raining.

oldman2005 · 21 March 2019, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrist Watcher

Not sure Omega is laughing at Rolex, but I do love my SMP!

Beautiful!

Thanos · 21 March 2019, 03:10 AM

Omega light years ahead of Rolex other than marketing

LuminousMaximus · 21 March 2019, 03:13 AM

no

ejj · 21 March 2019, 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reddog4063

does anyone know when IWC announces? I hope they come out a winner.

I think they presented at SIHH, no? New Spitfire watches looked really good...

Rokoru · 21 March 2019, 03:26 AM

Maybe it is time to get a Seamaster 300m with that awesome movement....

Carry The Interest · 21 March 2019, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ejj

I think they presented at SIHH, no? New Spitfire watches looked really good...

This is correct. They presented at SIHH and had quite a production for the Spitfire collection. Here is a link to the official site with some great photos of their display.

rudestew · 21 March 2019, 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman2005

Beautiful!

Cannot argue with that.

Ravager135 · 21 March 2019, 03:42 AM

Honestly, I'm not so sure Omega has been knocking it out of the park either. Omega has two main watches (for argument's sake): the Speedmaster and the Seamaster. The Speedmaster occasionally get an interesting release, but Omega has certainly overdone with a lot of forgettable variations. Honestly, the most interesting variations that Omega has done with the Speedmaster all come from the Hodinkee collaboration. The "Speedy Tuesday" and most recent "Anniversary" releases are excellent re-imaginings. Otherwise, not so much.

The Seamaster has felt lost for some time. It is not a threat to the Submariner in any way and other than adding a ceramic bezel or adding waves on the dial, hasn't really changed a whole lot. That's not to say it isn't a good looking watch. The vintage inspired Seamasters are interesting, but what buyers really want is something more similar to the sword-handed WatchCo Seamaster 300. Omega has yet to deliver on that.

strettyend · 21 March 2019, 03:48 AM

I actually quite like the 50th anniversary Speedmaster in Gold and the provenance is way better than the TT Sea-Dweller monstrosity that Rolex decided to give us today. Omega is a great brand, as is Rolex and many others. There is no reason to be a fanboy and hate on any one brand, we can enjoy all brands and watches.

Ravager135 · 21 March 2019, 03:52 AM

As far as IWC, their Spitfire releases are decent looking (everyone is doing the drab green dial). It was an interesting choice to call this collection the Spitfire Collection considering IWC has typically reserved its silver dials for Spitfire models. Perhaps, they are pivoting the aesthetic of the line.

The only problem with IWC is outside of the Pilot and Portuguese references, IWC still lacks depth. Sure the Portofino is beautiful and there are some great Aquatimer releases in years past, but neither line makes a statement the way the Pilot line does. To credit IWC, they know what they are good at and hypermasculine pilot's watches will always be their forte, but I think they need broader appeal.

wrxsti · 21 March 2019, 04:18 AM

i think the OP meant, Omega is relieved and not laughing at Rolex.

GoingPlaces · 21 March 2019, 04:23 AM

Absurd statement and comparison. Omega is the aspirational brand. Rolex is the aspiration.

j-watch · 21 March 2019, 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johneh

Ha! I highly doubt it. Rolex is becoming a joke. I get it, you're clearly a fan boy judging by your signature, but try opening your eyes to something else.

Omega is turning things around, while Rolex seems to enjoy pissing on your head and telling you it's raining.

Right, talk about fanboy????

I've opened my eyes, and actually own several Omega's. Nice watches, but not the same as a sports Rolex. Never have, never will be and always trying to play catch up to you know who.

Love your comment, "Rolex becoming a joke". Yeah......if you say so.....

deedle · 21 March 2019, 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrist Watcher

Not sure Omega is laughing at Rolex, but I do love my SMP!

Looked at this yesterday with the grey face! Love it!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

21 March 2019, 01:45 AM	#62
Wrist Watcher 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: USA Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 1,443	Not sure Omega is laughing at Rolex, but I do love my SMP! __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610LV (Hulk) Rolex GMT Master II 126710BLRO (Pepsi) Rolex Daytona 116500LN (White)

21 March 2019, 01:58 AM	#65
darkside7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Austin Tx Watch: Sub-C Posts: 504	They can laugh when they overtake Rolex in sales. __________________

21 March 2019, 02:38 AM	#74
reddog4063 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: NYC Posts: 216	does anyone know when IWC announces? I hope they come out a winner. __________________ King of the Air Please note, all of my posts are meant to spark discussion to make the board fun. I do not need advice and consent, I am having fun here

21 March 2019, 03:13 AM	#79
LuminousMaximus "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Watch: me hit Huge Lotto Posts: 6,502	no __________________ “Every man Dies... Not Every Man, Really Lives.” – William Wallace - To really lives means to live your life to the fullest. It means to chase your dreams, take risks, and to love life. Since everyone’s fate is the same, why not live the best life that you possibly can? In order to really live,you must seize the day. Live each day as if it's your last and overall just do it! Today is a gift, that’s why it’s called the present...

21 March 2019, 03:48 AM	#85
strettyend "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: Miami Posts: 1,654	I actually quite like the 50th anniversary Speedmaster in Gold and the provenance is way better than the TT Sea-Dweller monstrosity that Rolex decided to give us today. Omega is a great brand, as is Rolex and many others. There is no reason to be a fanboy and hate on any one brand, we can enjoy all brands and watches. __________________ AP ROC 26315or; AP RO 15450st; Vacheron Fiftysix; Day Date RG 228235 Olive; Daytona YG 116528; Daytona YG Oysterflex 116518; Cartier Santos de Cartier Rose Gold; Panerai PAM 0048; IWC Portofino Chrono; Girard-Perregaux Richeville

21 March 2019, 01:45 AM	#61
aksd "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Real Name: Akshay Location: London Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 18	To throw a spanner into the mix, I'm thinking Breitlings look a whole lot more interesting this year, especially the 806 1959 re-issue

21 March 2019, 02:28 AM	#69
2nastie "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: YVR Watch: Time Only Posts: 2,332	Are you sure it's not the other way around. Omega brings "fancy" new models and probably gets the same reception as the previous years... Rolex makes little tweaks and spits out stuff we don't want yet their older models will now be selling quicker and more than ever... meanwhile their "new" lineup picks off the individuals who just wants a Rolex or those who want to say they have the newest thing. Pretty ingenious. Does nothing, yet increases value and demand on their watches. Props to Rolex.

21 March 2019, 02:32 AM	#70
904VT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: USA Watch: All Rolex Posts: 6,976	Lol Omega is not laughing and I'm sure Rolex isn't worried at all. If anything Omega is worried about Tudor. Doesn't mean I'm happy about it, and the approach. But Rolex compared to this year's Omega releases will not be out of date next year anyway, so what's the point with Omega and so many updates.

21 March 2019, 02:32 AM	#71
Boba Fett "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: Kamino Watch: Star Wars Posts: 382	So your average guy decides to buy a watch to celebrate something. He walks into Rolex store "I'd like to buy a chronograph or a GMT please". "Yes sir we have these in precious metal or you can wait ten years for one in steel" Man laughs assuming it's a joke as the GMT is on the cover of the catalogue and in lots of advertising. After being told this is not a joke he leaves. Next door in omega....

21 March 2019, 03:10 AM	#78
Thanos "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: Toronto Posts: 199	Omega light years ahead of Rolex other than marketing

21 March 2019, 03:26 AM	#81
Rokoru "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Location: Europe Posts: 759	Maybe it is time to get a Seamaster 300m with that awesome movement....

21 March 2019, 03:42 AM	#84
Ravager135 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: New Jersey Posts: 4,144	Honestly, I'm not so sure Omega has been knocking it out of the park either. Omega has two main watches (for argument's sake): the Speedmaster and the Seamaster. The Speedmaster occasionally get an interesting release, but Omega has certainly overdone with a lot of forgettable variations. Honestly, the most interesting variations that Omega has done with the Speedmaster all come from the Hodinkee collaboration. The "Speedy Tuesday" and most recent "Anniversary" releases are excellent re-imaginings. Otherwise, not so much. The Seamaster has felt lost for some time. It is not a threat to the Submariner in any way and other than adding a ceramic bezel or adding waves on the dial, hasn't really changed a whole lot. That's not to say it isn't a good looking watch. The vintage inspired Seamasters are interesting, but what buyers really want is something more similar to the sword-handed WatchCo Seamaster 300. Omega has yet to deliver on that.

21 March 2019, 03:52 AM	#86
Ravager135 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: New Jersey Posts: 4,144	As far as IWC, their Spitfire releases are decent looking (everyone is doing the drab green dial). It was an interesting choice to call this collection the Spitfire Collection considering IWC has typically reserved its silver dials for Spitfire models. Perhaps, they are pivoting the aesthetic of the line. The only problem with IWC is outside of the Pilot and Portuguese references, IWC still lacks depth. Sure the Portofino is beautiful and there are some great Aquatimer releases in years past, but neither line makes a statement the way the Pilot line does. To credit IWC, they know what they are good at and hypermasculine pilot's watches will always be their forte, but I think they need broader appeal.

21 March 2019, 04:18 AM	#87
wrxsti "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Earth Posts: 1,694	i think the OP meant, Omega is relieved and not laughing at Rolex. __________________ PP Geneva

21 March 2019, 04:23 AM	#88
GoingPlaces "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 5,341	Absurd statement and comparison. Omega is the aspirational brand. Rolex is the aspiration.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)