ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 November 2017, 07:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
GMT caseback on a Submariner?
I know this is blasphemy and the lynch mob will put me on their hit list, but....
Has anyone tried a GMT caseback on a Submariner? I love the slimness of my 14060M and played with the idea of making it even slimmer by swapping on the thinner caseback from a GMT Master or Explorer II. It's a very reversible mod and I don't plan on SCUBA diving with it, or worse....having Rolex Authorized service handle the watch and was just curious if I'm the first one with this crazy idea....? |
10 November 2017, 08:28 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas tx
Watch: 16610,1675,16030
Posts: 1,135
|
|
10 November 2017, 08:43 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,848
|
Never measured the thread depth on either watch but you probably aren’t engaging all the threads on the sub case when using a gmt caseback.
|
10 November 2017, 08:44 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 215
|
I thought about it, but am too lazy to buy the tool to try it. I'd imagine a Submariner 100m would be way more comfortable.
|
10 November 2017, 09:51 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
|
10 November 2017, 10:01 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
The guy at Custom Watch Concepts would certainly know this, and you could buy a GMT caseback from him too if it fits. My concern would be that even if it fits the gasket might not provide a proper seal, since it wouldn't be properly squished into place.
|
10 November 2017, 11:15 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
Quote:
|
|
10 November 2017, 02:49 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
|
10 November 2017, 04:39 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
Yeah, that case back shape with the raised center section is one of my least favorite thing about Rolex watches over the last number of years. It actually gives me arm pain from time to time. Something about the way it presses into me. I switched from a Sub to an Exp II, which was better, but it still bothered me. If I were to get another vintage style sport watch, it'd likely be a Tudor Sub (or a much older Sub.)
|
11 November 2017, 02:09 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: TN
Posts: 185
|
Why would you want to tamper with the engineering, design and pressure proofing of this watch? Rolex case backs are not designed to be interchangeable with other models even if it might seem to fit.
|
11 November 2017, 02:32 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
The same could be said about any car mod. I don’t see any problem with experimentation, it’s thats what one desires. These are basic little mechanical watches, not some space module from the future.
|
19 February 2018, 01:50 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Update!
I have acquired a GMT caseback and I'm waiting for an opportunity to visit my trusted watchmaker...I'll report back! |
23 March 2018, 03:37 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Update: Taking in the Sub to my Watchmaker today.
|
23 March 2018, 04:01 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
I hope that it fits.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
23 March 2018, 04:10 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,063
|
At one point didn’t both models use the same case? I’d say there is a good chance it will work.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
7 April 2018, 07:25 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
it DID work!
Here are some photos: So here's my 14060M Sub with the standard Sub caseback: Here's the Sub caseback: And here's how it measures, just over 1.5mm: Here's is the GMT caseback I sourced: And it measures just under 0.9mm...wow!...pretty thin... My watchmaker said it went it without any issues and he swapped the gasket and pressure tested the watch to 100m Now it's a little slimmer, similar to the 5513 which is pressured rated to 200m instead of 300. I doubt it will ever go past 10 feet. If I ever sell it (doubtful), I will obviously fit the original caseback on again.... |
7 April 2018, 08:31 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 318
|
Wow oh wow, no one will even know the difference in the caseback unless you tell them. Thanks for sharing, I’m sure everyone here benefits from your experience. You won’t know until you try it. Good job
|
7 April 2018, 08:42 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: Big Land
Posts: 233
|
it seems to stick out a bit opposed to the factory flush seating.
are any caseback threads exposed after proper torquing? |
7 April 2018, 09:02 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 441
|
Loss of water resistance, cost of GMT case-back, and install labor - all to save .6 mm. ???
Hardly seems worth it. |
7 April 2018, 09:30 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
I kinda get it. If you have smaller / flatter wrists you do notice the difference in the two case backs when it’s on your wrist. I’ve tried on the both the sub and gmt and opted for the gmt due to the way it sat better on my wrist. Now had that beautiful Hulk I was looking had the GMT case back Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
7 April 2018, 10:06 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Quote:
Also, the bracelet fit was kind of "in between" holes on the clasp and so the biggest difference I notice with the GMT caseback is the fit of the bracelet is such that now I don't have to fine adjust the fit in the middle of the day like I used to. |
|
7 April 2018, 10:16 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: RI
Watch: blusylvx2blnrsmpbb
Posts: 723
|
Great job !!!
|
7 April 2018, 11:29 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
|
Quote:
Good job OP, now you have the perfect sub!
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue | |
|
7 April 2018, 11:33 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Georgia
Watch: All of them
Posts: 569
|
Glad it worked out for you.
Was curious about a similar swap, except a Sub back on a Sea Dweller.
__________________
Current:
Rolex Daytona 116500 | Rolex Submariner 116610 | Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69 Past: Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 | Rolex Submariner 16610 | Rolex Submariner 1680 |
7 April 2018, 12:10 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
Casebacks aren't expensive, and the WR matters only to a very hardcore diver. Seems like a negligible cost for a small but not insignificant improvement.
|
7 April 2018, 12:15 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
Interesting...never thought about doing this swap bt the two refs but definitely understand why you performed this little experiment...good to know and thanks for sharing
|
7 April 2018, 12:21 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
Just noticed the case back to your 14060 has 2160 stamped inside but your GMT back is stamped with the reference number, as I thought it would...anyone know what the 2160 stamp indicates?
|
7 April 2018, 12:33 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
|
7 April 2018, 04:08 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Nope, it's an optical illusion. In real life, the case fits as flat as the original, no protrusion....just looks like that in that photo for some reason.
|
9 April 2018, 12:47 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Plus, I love the fact that the 14060/M has a flatter bezel than that of 16610 and I just thought it would be cool to create the lowest profile Sub possible without having to go with a Tudor (not that there's anything wrong with the 200M Tudor Subs!)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.