Imperfections in 5711

[KarlS]

Originally Posted by Patton250

Could be a J

thats a good point...

[11imartinez]

Sorry guys. I'm traveling overseas and quite busy. Here are the photos... done with the iPhone so they are not great but no more equipment here.

IMG_7251.jpg

IMG_7252.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[KarlS]

It's a nice watch that I think you over magnified and disappointed yourself in the process.

[topcat30093]

Originally Posted by unknown

Sir,
Don't take it personal. If I offended you, accept my apologies. Never intended to take it personal

But since this was you first post here I thought you could be here just to complain, you wouldn't be the first

That aside, These imperfections are really very acceptable. Quite a few members agreed with you ... But also to them ... if a scratch , probably smaller than 0.5 mm is unacceptable to you I think you should think about finding another passion.

I don't drive a fancy car but if I could afford a Rolls Royce, you think I would make pics from every square centimeter , enlarge it to 50 square cm .... search for very tiny faults, and if I found one start complaining ?

I'm sure I can find 500 of these faults on a new Rolls. Maybe a little scratch on a rim, an imperfection on the leather seats, a not 100% straight stitching, an air vent that isn't 100% exactly aligned in the dashboard , etc

Originally Posted by Chadridv

I've said it before but it's just a hilarious funny notion... My first AP had some issues, and when I brought them up, I was more or less told...

"Audemars Piguet, Patek Philippe are hand made pieces of art, if you want laser precision and accuracy buy a Rolex."

When my Rolex has had issues...

"Rolex are mass produced and made by machines, there will of course be errors. If you want perfection, buy a Patek Philippe or Audemars Piguet!"

haha

Originally Posted by mwilson

Well look at the bright side - the inevitable scratch on the bezel will draw your attention away from the dial and hand.

All of the above.
Loved the post by charidv
Based on the new photo provided by the OP, I really can't see an issue.
But as the OP is now aware of them and has concerns, than they should take it back to their AD. So they have peace of mind.

[RussW]

Thanks for the better photos. I can see the marks on the hands you were referring to, but maybe that's because I know they are there. If they are obvious irl (and maybe they catch the light) I'd take it back to your AD with your concerns.

Also is that a mark on the top right of the nine o'clock marker?

[kitsgq]

I would definitely send it to Patek for their expert opinion. Good luck. I would be equally as annoyed as you. I will make sure to bring a loupe with Mr before I take delivery of my 5712, which I've been told arrives in the next 3-4 months.

[kitsgq]

Originally Posted by kitsgq

I would definitely send it to Patek for their expert opinion. Good luck. I would be equally as annoyed as you. I will make sure to bring a loupe with Mr before I take delivery of my 5712, which I've been told arrives in the next 3-4 months.

With me*

[toucan]

To the cynics I guess it wasn't a fake. Apologies or you only apologize for Patek.

[RussW]

Originally Posted by toucan

To the cynics I guess it wasn't a fake. Apologies or you only apologize for Patek.

I was skeptical, not cynical, and based on the initial photos with every reason

[texasmade]

That's definitely imperfections visible to the naked eye. I'd be quite upset also if that were my watch.

[Xerxes77]

send it back

[KarlS]

Guess thus thread didn't go anywhere! N

[GoingPlaces]

I'd send it back without hesitation. Handmade or machine made, both irrelevant. You spend ten's of thousands and have this flaw, unacceptable. Im certain Patek will take care of this.

[KarlS]

I think last post 15 March and with a total of 5.....we know where this has gone!!

[lapince]

Originally Posted by HorologyK

If comfort is your riding factor, I'd pick up a new ceramic Daytona. My Daytona is more comfortable than some former Patek's I've owned.

We have one, but letting my wife wear it, stil think my 5711/12 and 5167R are more comfy

Originally Posted by GB-man

Agree and arnuad is picking one up soon.

No question 5711/5712/5167 are more comfortable than the 116500 but as we all know the ceramic bezel allows a certain level of comfort that you can't deny.

I know arnuad felt like his former Rolex were somewhat bulky, the Daytona case takes care of that.

I agree that my 3 are more comfy than the 116500

Originally Posted by Chadridv

I've said it before but it's just a hilarious funny notion... My first AP had some issues, and when I brought them up, I was more or less told...

"Audemars Piguet, Patek Philippe are hand made pieces of art, if you want laser precision and accuracy buy a Rolex."

When my Rolex has had issues...

"Rolex are mass produced and made by machines, there will of course be errors. If you want perfection, buy a Patek Philippe or Audemars Piguet!"

haha

Originally Posted by AK797

Yes, well spotted, even with a flash they should look darker surely. Need to see more pics of the watch front and back to know if this is real.

Nope real, I guess the huge magnification made it look not black

Originally Posted by KarlS

Guess thus thread didn't go anywhere! N

Well maybe he sent it back but I think we would have known about it

[soundserious]

Been off the forum for about 2 months, nice to see things haven't changed much lol.

[Murcielagoboy2]

I can't believe that people are staring into the dial at 6600% magnification. I mean, please forgive me, but this is some of the saddest behaviour I've ever seen. What happened to opening the seal with glass of champagne, slapping it on your wrist, scratching the hell out of the case immediately on your first night out and laughing and smiling about it?

Patek QC isn't what it was - we know that. But nor are the customers. Was it Thierry Stern's grandfather who said "I make watches for Industrialists" ??
Well not now they don't - make them for some seriously saddo nerds.

I'm sorry to be offensive but I have no better way to articulate my thoughts.

Don't send it back. It's FINE. Live your life.

[KarlS]

Or he is a troll