The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 February 2018, 05:48 AM   #1
coralfarmer84
"TRF" Member
 
coralfarmer84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex, PP
Posts: 1,198
Thinking Patek 5726 or 5711r. Push me one direction.

I’ve got a decent collection of Rolex’s and now I’ve gotten the Patek bug. I know the 5711 in stainless ain’t happening so I’ve narrowed it down to the 5711r or 5726 both on bracelet. I’m kinda torn because I want an annual calendar/moon phase (hence why I’m looking outside rolex) but also eventually wanted something rose gold in my collection. Prices seem to be all over the place, I don’t plan to resell, but if I buy from a trusted seller which one would I likely lose less on down the road? Or should I get on a wait list at an AD. I know the rolex game but Patek is new to me, your input is appreciated.

My current collection

All rolex.
Hulk (green face stainless submariner)
smurf (blue face white gold submariner)
Green face yellow gold gmt
Ceramic Daytona white face
Day date 40 yellow gold black face diamond stick markers

Would be adding to this or possibly sacrificing the smurf.
__________________
Work hard in silence. Let your success make the noise
coralfarmer84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 05:51 AM   #2
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
like both. considering your collection i would get the 5726. You have PM and less complicated watches already
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:05 AM   #3
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,675
It seems like the 5726 would be a good fit on your collection


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:07 AM   #4
ars1g09
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SIN/LDN/JKT
Watch: R, AP, PP
Posts: 161
5726 I would argue.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ars1g09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:14 AM   #5
Roovain
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Ou il fait froid.
Posts: 80
I have a new Rolex Daytona Oysterflex, a Submariner, an Omega Planet Ocean, and a Zenith El Primero. I was in the same situation as you; and TODAY, I committed to the 5726 SS, and will swap out the black leather strap for a brown leather strap. Can't wait. Go for it !!
Roovain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:24 AM   #6
coralfarmer84
"TRF" Member
 
coralfarmer84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex, PP
Posts: 1,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roovain View Post
I have a new Rolex Daytona Oysterflex, a Submariner, an Omega Planet Ocean, and a Zenith El Primero. I was in the same situation as you; and TODAY, I committed to the 5726 SS, and will swap out the black leather strap for a brown leather strap. Can't wait. Go for it !!
That’s Awesome. Big congratulations!
__________________
Work hard in silence. Let your success make the noise
coralfarmer84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:32 AM   #7
nyc2la
"TRF" Member
 
nyc2la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,176
I tried on the 5711/1r once (about 6 months ago). I cannot get it out of my head. Without question in my mind, the 5711/1r is the way to go here.

Calling Neil and Kevin for some pics..........
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE
nyc2la is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:34 AM   #8
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
I agree with Steve. Get the 1r
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:35 AM   #9
Toony
"TRF" Member
 
Toony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: Gatchaman
Posts: 1,873
I’m a precious metal lover. 5711r is just gorgeous.
Toony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 06:48 AM   #10
Vipes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,838
Both excellent choices. I would go for the 5711r over the 5726. The beauty of RG, heft and thinness of this piece beats the AC function for me. Add a Patek AC later like the 5396.
Vipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 07:23 AM   #11
kneedeep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
I'm in the 5711/1R camp. Just an exquisite PM piece.
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018
kneedeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 07:53 AM   #12
kingofthehill
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: World
Posts: 485
5711/1R (or 15202OR...)
kingofthehill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 08:12 AM   #13
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
You have enough PM watches, I would get the 5726, will give you cool complications
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 08:33 AM   #14
ap1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,041
5726 fits better as you have DD but one v. One I like the 1r
ap1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 08:47 AM   #15
rolexrookie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2
All your Rollies will make up for the 5711.
You're short of a complication in your collection, 5726 will suit the bill.
Good luck!

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
rolexrookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 08:50 AM   #16
incontrol
"TRF" Member
 
incontrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
Nothing more beautiful than the 5711 /1R. It is stunning.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Patek Philippe
Rolex
incontrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 08:51 AM   #17
Roovain
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Ou il fait froid.
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
You have enough PM watches, I would get the 5726, will give you cool complications
I agree. To me, one of the primary attractions to Patek is their innovative attention to complications. They're literally the "father of the Annual Calendar", and have perfected the perpetual calendar. To get a Patek, and NOT take advantage of one of those milestones/hallmarks, is (to me) missing the boat. No offense to those who have Calatrava's, 5711's, 5712's, etc....just my 2 cents. To me, the Patek name is synonymous with meticulous complications. That's why I bought the 5726 today....not because it's stainless steel....not because it's got a unique rounded octagonal shape, or is in great demand (and highly coveted)....but because I adore the style of this case and face, and, at the same time, respect what Patek can do with complications. A true masterpiece of workmanship. The 5726 says it all.....without having to spend $125,000++++++.
Roovain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 09:14 AM   #18
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by incontrol View Post
Nothing more beautiful than the 5711 /1R. It is stunning.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's beautiful, brother. OK let's ramp up the pressure.

AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 09:14 AM   #19
vtsyrlin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Posts: 141
I am in the same predicament at the moment and have identical two to choose from.
I want a daily watch so 5726 seems like a more pragmatic option. I hear that 5711/r scratches way too easy?!
vtsyrlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 09:45 AM   #20
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtsyrlin View Post
I am in the same predicament at the moment and have identical two to choose from.
I want a daily watch so 5726 seems like a more pragmatic option. I hear that 5711/r scratches way too easy?!
in most cases i would get the 5711/r. Its that nice. In the context of a collection its a toss up depending on what you have. I wouldn't get it as a daily though.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 09:53 AM   #21
vtsyrlin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Posts: 141
In my collection I have 5167 (which I use as a daily), the hulk and few other ss watches.
Don't have any RG. I've been told that RG doesn't quite work with my skin tones.
IMHO RG looks great on a darker, tanned skin
vtsyrlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 10:50 AM   #22
myporsche
"TRF" Member
 
myporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: LA<>NY
Watch: Rolex♠Lange
Posts: 2,277
I vote 5711r, not only is it absolutely gorgeous, it will cover all the metals in your collection. If you need to get rid of watch keep the smurf, the ultimate SUB IMO, and get rid of one of the SS that way you will have all the metals. I'm more of a sub fan than Daytona so for me it would be the Ceramic Daytona and as a bonus you will get a good return on secondary market.

Quote:
Originally Posted by coralfarmer84 View Post
I’ve got a decent collection of Rolex’s and now I’ve gotten the Patek bug. I know the 5711 in stainless ain’t happening so I’ve narrowed it down to the 5711r or 5726 both on bracelet. I’m kinda torn because I want an annual calendar/moon phase (hence why I’m looking outside rolex) but also eventually wanted something rose gold in my collection. Prices seem to be all over the place, I don’t plan to resell, but if I buy from a trusted seller which one would I likely lose less on down the road? Or should I get on a wait list at an AD. I know the rolex game but Patek is new to me, your input is appreciated.

My current collection

All rolex.
Hulk (green face stainless submariner)
smurf (blue face white gold submariner)
Green face yellow gold gmt
Ceramic Daytona white face
Day date 40 yellow gold black face diamond stick markers

Would be adding to this or possibly sacrificing the smurf.
myporsche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 10:53 AM   #23
myporsche
"TRF" Member
 
myporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: LA<>NY
Watch: Rolex♠Lange
Posts: 2,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roovain View Post
I agree. To me, one of the primary attractions to Patek is their innovative attention to complications. They're literally the "father of the Annual Calendar", and have perfected the perpetual calendar. To get a Patek, and NOT take advantage of one of those milestones/hallmarks, is (to me) missing the boat. No offense to those who have Calatrava's, 5711's, 5712's, etc....just my 2 cents. To me, the Patek name is synonymous with meticulous complications. That's why I bought the 5726 today....not because it's stainless steel....not because it's got a unique rounded octagonal shape, or is in great demand (and highly coveted)....but because I adore the style of this case and face, and, at the same time, respect what Patek can do with complications. A true masterpiece of workmanship. The 5726 says it all.....without having to spend $125,000++++++.
A great counterargument, Patek is complications, but I just couldn't get over the simple moonphase when I held this watch at the AD, why can't Patek step up the Moonphase like ALS?
myporsche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 11:39 AM   #24
Defiancekofb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,999
5726, You have two PM watches, an AC would be a great addition to your lineup.
Defiancekofb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 12:43 PM   #25
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
I love the 5711r however in your case I would go 5726
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 12:56 PM   #26
Roovain
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Ou il fait froid.
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by myporsche View Post
A great counterargument, Patek is complications, but I just couldn't get over the simple moonphase when I held this watch at the AD, why can't Patek step up the Moonphase like ALS?
I absolutely agree. Just checked out the A. Lange & Sohne moonphase watches...and they're stunning. Even the Breguet and IWC watches are very artistic. I wonder why Patek's moonphases are so simplified and stencil-looking? They even use that same simplified stencil-look on their $1M++ watches !! Really?
Roovain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 02:33 PM   #27
incontrol
"TRF" Member
 
incontrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
That's beautiful, brother. OK let's ramp up the pressure.





Haha! Great job My friend! The pressure is real!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Patek Philippe
Rolex
incontrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 03:15 PM   #28
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,859
I can’t help chose as they are both great. Find an AD that will work with you and get it that way. Not worth acquiring on second hand market.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 03:31 PM   #29
nyc2la
"TRF" Member
 
nyc2la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by incontrol View Post
Nothing more beautiful than the 5711 /1R. It is stunning.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
That's beautiful, brother. OK let's ramp up the pressure.





And the calling for the enablers is having it’s desired effect, but on me?!?! These pictures are awesome and troubling, beautiful and dangerous.

I still remember the day I tried this one on - it has the perfect balance of the heft of gold and the silky / buttery feel of the gold Nautilus bracelet wrapping the wrist.

__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE
nyc2la is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2018, 11:11 PM   #30
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by myporsche View Post
A great counterargument, Patek is complications, but I just couldn't get over the simple moonphase when I held this watch at the AD, why can't Patek step up the Moonphase like ALS?
I do agree with this, but the RG finishing on the Nautilus is so exquisite that it kind of counts as a comp itself.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.