The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 August 2019, 08:17 PM   #31
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogdogg View Post
Don't give up hope just yet Grady. It could still happen. There's still time!
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 08:28 PM   #32
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle3130 View Post
I’ll probably get flamed for this but IMHO, the Daytona is the hardest for me to love. I will explain. I don’t care for all of the polished surfaces, I think sport/professional watches should be brushed. The ceramic bezel is too shiny and also more brittle than the aluminum/steel of the past that provided more character to the watch. The proportions are small. The dial is too busy and sometimes hard to read depending on dial color and lighting conditions. If Paul Newman never wore one, way less people would care about it and it wouldn’t be overpriced. Just my thoughts on why the Daytona doesn’t do anything for me. (Flame suit donned)
Dont think you are alone in that regard...there are quite a few other too but each to their own I suppose.
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 08:31 PM   #33
Aztro
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Perth, Australia
Watch: Rolex Milgauss Z
Posts: 84
YMII and any Sea Dweller
Aztro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 08:36 PM   #34
huba01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,425
Another vote for YM2, way to busy for me
huba01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:07 PM   #35
Monty22
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Rob
Location: Ballgames, O’Hare
Watch: 126715CHNR, 116400
Posts: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle3130 View Post
I’ll probably get flamed for this but IMHO, the Daytona is the hardest for me to love. I will explain. I don’t care for all of the polished surfaces, I think sport/professional watches should be brushed. The ceramic bezel is too shiny and also more brittle than the aluminum/steel of the past that provided more character to the watch. The proportions are small. The dial is too busy and sometimes hard to read depending on dial color and lighting conditions. If Paul Newman never wore one, way less people would care about it and it wouldn’t be overpriced. Just my thoughts on why the Daytona doesn’t do anything for me. (Flame suit donned)


+ 1. Sorry to all of the fans. I have desired the WG OF 116519 for a while and recently tried one on that was already sold at my AD...wears a bit too small, IMHO.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Monty22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:12 PM   #36
Camel
"TRF" Member
 
Camel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Willem
Location: Pretoria RSA
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 1,072
YMII, BLNR and Daytona.
__________________
Rolex Datejust II WG/SS Blue 116334 "8368xxxx"
Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 126600 "94A6xxxx"
Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660 "V84xxxx"
Rolex Deepsea D-Blue Horizon 116660 "3170xxxx"
Rolex Explorer II Polar 16570 "T20xxxx"
Rolex Explorer II Black 216570 "G53xxxx"
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "P32xxxx"
Rolex GMT-Master II Ceramic 116710LN "V97xxxx"
Rolex Submariner 16610 "Z61xxxx"
Rolex Submariner Ceramic 116610LN "G79xxxx"
Camel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:23 PM   #37
jvb.nc
"TRF" Member
 
jvb.nc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NC / CA
Watch: 228206meteorite
Posts: 1,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle3130 View Post
I’ll probably get flamed for this but IMHO, the Daytona is the hardest for me to love. I will explain. I don’t care for all of the polished surfaces, I think sport/professional watches should be brushed. The ceramic bezel is too shiny and also more brittle than the aluminum/steel of the past that provided more character to the watch. The proportions are small. The dial is too busy and sometimes hard to read depending on dial color and lighting conditions. If Paul Newman never wore one, way less people would care about it and it wouldn’t be overpriced. Just my thoughts on why the Daytona doesn’t do anything for me. (Flame suit donned)
no flame!!

a) the polished surfaces are subjective. i don’t find it insanely flashy or shiny, but clearly YMMV.
b) ceramic can be brittle, but lord it’s an improvement IMHO on the scratch-magnet polished bezels of precious models (which were also shinier, to my eyes).
c) it is fairly small in comparison to other models and to other brands.
d) i’ve been confused by this whole legibility question. a lot of folks have this issue, and i just don’t understand it myself. i find it easier to read than some of my other watches, but again i find this subjective.

e) this is an issue for me, but i’m not flaming. when i discovered the daytona in 1998, i had no idea that Newman had ever worn one, that it was hard to acquire in steel (even then!), or that it had a crazy cult following. a lot of folks these days are putting emphasis on the newman connection or that folks are just buying them because of their secondary value; i just bought my first because i truly, deeply love it. and i will buy more, because i clearly am mad for it.

again, this is completely subjective and there’s no problem with any of us feeling the way we do. in fact it makes collecting super interesting IMO. it is possible to debate and disagree without flame suits being necessary!



but lordy that air king is just atrocious and i could never be bothered to consider owning one. i find it gross, difficult to read, and although i like the green bit of color on the dial, it just drives me nuts.



it’s so interesting to see people that collect the same brand but are so highly polarized.
__________________
116710blnr / 116610lv / 216750 polar / 126600 mk1 / 116500ln / 126710blro / 228206 meteorite / 126719 meteorite / Pelagos 25600 // insta @jvbphotos
jvb.nc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:25 PM   #38
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunylw View Post
Yachtmaster 2. I wouldn’t wear it for free.

This
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:30 PM   #39
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
1. Modern GMT LN. Looks terrible in person, on my wrist at least.
2. OPs, other than black and white which I absolutely love
3. Anything worth 30k on Oysterflex. No thank you, rubber strap for 30k+.
4. 116660 wayyyy to big. Wears and looks awful on the wrist, even though it is a very cool watch.
5. Anything TT, with exception of bluesy and champagne jubilee flutted DJ41 which are fantastic!
6. Smooth bezel datejust actual hurts my eyes. It is my least favorite watch variation possible in the Rolex lineup. Looks unbearably boring on oyster and incomplete on jubilee.
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:41 PM   #40
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,475
One man’s trash is another man’s treasure....
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:48 PM   #41
samson66
2024 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 12,898
Never been a fan of the standard YM series - just too small and dainty and feminine for me. I actually love the YMII. The YM42 is a step in the right direction

samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:48 PM   #42
badass09
"TRF" Member
 
badass09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: prabhu
Location: singapore
Watch: ROLEX 116613LBD
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brny11 View Post
1. Modern GMT LN. Looks terrible in person, on my wrist at least.
2. OPs, other than black and white which I absolutely love
3. Anything worth 30k on Oysterflex. No thank you, rubber strap for 30k+.
4. 116660 wayyyy to big. Wears and looks awful on the wrist, even though it is a very cool watch.
5. Anything TT, with exception of bluesy and champagne jubilee flutted DJ41 which are fantastic!
6. Smooth bezel datejust actual hurts my eyes. It is my least favorite watch variation possible in the Rolex lineup. Looks unbearably boring on oyster and incomplete on jubilee.
I strongly agree with you on the oysterflex.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
badass09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:49 PM   #43
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,205
Milgauss black. Looks dull to me.
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:49 PM   #44
jvb.nc
"TRF" Member
 
jvb.nc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NC / CA
Watch: 228206meteorite
Posts: 1,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
One man’s trash is another man’s treasure....
so very very true.
__________________
116710blnr / 116610lv / 216750 polar / 126600 mk1 / 116500ln / 126710blro / 228206 meteorite / 126719 meteorite / Pelagos 25600 // insta @jvbphotos
jvb.nc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 09:53 PM   #45
PureCoconut
2024 Pledge Member
 
PureCoconut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Coco
Location: ��&
Watch: 5711
Posts: 611
Yachty 2
PureCoconut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 10:16 PM   #46
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
Hardest to love for me are the Sub and Sub Date. Because I want to love them but can't see past those lugs that only a mother could love.

Brilliant, popular, iconic, robust, a fantastic all rounder. But man. Those lugs!
This is a common thought.

When I first saw the 'new' Sub years ago I was truly appalled. I thought it looked awful compared to the classic 5 digit and I would have agreed with you.

It took me quite some time to come to terms with what they did to it, however now that I own one and have become familiar with it my attitude has changed. Now to me the 5 digit looks weedy and feels fragile.

The 6 digit may not be very photogenic, the lugs appear large in pictures but when the watch is wrapped around a wrist they seem less pronounced and blend in just fine. I guess it was designed to be worn rather than have pictures taken.
Rolex got it just right.
thesharkfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 10:28 PM   #47
iliketime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: NYC
Watch: 16570, 16710
Posts: 1,534
i dont care for any thing in the six digit serial but i suppose its a tie between the air king and milgauss. there is nothing redeemable about those models to me.
iliketime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 11:20 PM   #48
Chester01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
The 116900 Air King.

So badly wanted to love this watch. Even with the second coolest ref# , I still can’t.

What’s yours?
All watches with the maxi case. Just can’t get past it. No functional purpose other than to increase the wrist presence. In my mind increasing the wrist presence only has one purpose and that’s to add to the hey look at me factor. It also looks unbalanced and out of proportion.
Chester01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2019, 11:51 PM   #49
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,587
For me it’s the Milguass. I love the case, the green crystal, the size. Can’t stand the second hand
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 12:14 AM   #50
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Milgauss. All of them.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 12:42 AM   #51
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
For me, the Skydweller. Seriously ugly.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 01:06 AM   #52
JohnGingerwood
2024 Pledge Member
 
JohnGingerwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Real Name: Zach
Location: USA
Posts: 1,481
A milgauss. A lightening bolt second hand???
JohnGingerwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 01:18 AM   #53
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by chewbacca View Post
the 116900 air king.

So badly wanted to love this watch. Even with the second coolest ref# , i still can’t.

What’s yours?
ymii
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 01:24 AM   #54
JDsnewwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: JD
Location: NJ
Watch: 116710LN with BCL
Posts: 414
Any GMT on a jubilee. I respect the love but it’s not something I would ever want.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
JDsnewwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 01:30 AM   #55
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,741
Wanted to love the AK 116900 but sold it within days. Also not a fan of anything on Oysterflex.
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 01:59 AM   #56
Halifax Daytona UK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: North England
Posts: 377
Air king and YM2 and maybe the milguass
Halifax Daytona UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 02:08 AM   #57
TreiseKL
"TRF" Member
 
TreiseKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 258
YMII, Airking, Milgauss

I would add Batgirl to the addition, no wonder prices tanked.
__________________
♛ Independent owner of a bunch of stud's watches = Rolex ♛
TreiseKL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 02:12 AM   #58
Totoro
"TRF" Member
 
Totoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: Omega PloProf
Posts: 273
Airking, Milgauss, YM2 and skydweller. Yeah I said skydweller.

/ducks for cover

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Totoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 02:19 AM   #59
Carry The Interest
"TRF" Member
 
Carry The Interest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: LA
Watch: RLX, ALS
Posts: 3,410
Not much new to add here. I have a hard time embracing the AK -- the different colors and fonts on the dial just don't work me. I tend to embrace whimsical dials but this one just looks like a confused mess in my opinion.

I think a lot more of us would be willing to embrace YMII if the bezel didn't say "YACHT-MASTER II" on the bottom third of the bezel. That's the real deal killer for me. If it weren't for that, I think you'd have more people here promoting the watch as a niche piece with a very different complication.

Not trying to generalize here either -- I know both of these references a have a lot of fans on TRF and elsewhere.
Carry The Interest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2019, 02:26 AM   #60
JR16
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,186
Agree w a lot of posters - air king and ym2
Are a no-go for me and I don’t see that changing no matter the influence of SM


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
JR16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.