The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 January 2018, 02:51 AM   #31
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhanddds View Post
Correct
Very sound advice. You can't wear the wardrobe, and that's where the Box and Papers are.👍👍👍
Paulie 50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 03:44 AM   #32
Julz75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Julien
Location: Paris, France
Watch: 5513 MKV
Posts: 20
Thx you all for your answers and help, glad to have opened this thread and benefit from your knwoledge.

First of, I think most of you agree that #2 is a better choice than #1.
Happy to hear that as I also like #2 very much with its stunning patina and perfect match between dial and hands.
It is clearly my first choice and I kind of got a crush on it to be honest.
Not to mention it is cheapper than the #1.

I also agree - as said in my opening post - that #2 weakness is the case.
I'm usually pretty demanding regarding the case, but it doesn't bother that much here. I don't know why ; I think the patina catches my attention too much.
In any case I will have the possibility the see and touch the MK II this week, so I'll see if its case/lugs really bother me or not.

For the full set approach, I'm a bit divided especially for really old watches.
I bought my first three Rolex with full set (quite easy for the Airking and Exporer II, less for the 5513 MKV). It will clearly be a plus when/if I sell them, but honestly the papers sit in a box and I never look at them. In contrary to my watches.
And when I see the prices of a 1675 full set on Chrono24 (and not always in good shape), I'm really cooled of.

I will keep you updated.
Let's see if my (patina) crush on this watch fades away when I see it.
Julz75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 04:14 AM   #33
Wiener48
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,299
Keep us updated, good luck
Wiener48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 04:23 AM   #34
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Skip box and papers. Top condition watches sell easier and better than less great watches with papers so focus on condition. Of course box and papers are good if that perfect watch has it but only see it as a bonus. A 100% watch will give much more enjoyment than a 90% one and it will also be a better buy if you ever decide to sell.

Best of luck!
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 05:58 AM   #35
mattedialdoc
"TRF" Member
 
mattedialdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by roh123 View Post
Skip box and papers. Top condition watches sell easier and better than less great watches with papers so focus on condition. Of course box and papers are good if that perfect watch has it but only see it as a bonus. A 100% watch will give much more enjoyment than a 90% one and it will also be a better buy if you ever decide to sell.

Best of luck!

This is a great point : always choose the BEST condition watch you can afford. If you had the luxury of choosing btwn two equally perfect examples, and one had papers, then you could decide if the premium is worth it to you. Cheers!



------
Instagram: @mattedialdoc
mattedialdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 06:23 AM   #36
Julz75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Julien
Location: Paris, France
Watch: 5513 MKV
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattedialdoc View Post
This is a great point : always choose the BEST condition watch you can afford. If you had the luxury of choosing btwn two equally perfect examples, and one had papers, then you could decide if the premium is worth it to you. Cheers!



------
Instagram: @mattedialdoc
Noted, thx.
Julz75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 06:56 AM   #37
rootbeer7
"TRF" Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 5,932
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattedialdoc View Post
This is a great point : always choose the BEST condition watch you can afford. If you had the luxury of choosing btwn two equally perfect examples, and one had papers, then you could decide if the premium is worth it to you. Cheers!



------
Instagram: @mattedialdoc
This exactly
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 07:27 AM   #38
CRM114
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
Of the 2 choices, I'd pick #1 MK iV (1977). They both have nice patina to my eyes, and I much prefer #1's bezel.

But the main reason is the lugs on #2 turn me right off, particularly the length of the top ones, especially the 1 o'clock lug, and depth, especially at the 1 o'clock & 5 o'clock. They both look particularly horrible (not that 2 remaining are good). The lugs aren't merely rounded, but polished down to a point they're either flush or much shorter in length and/or below the level of the endlink edges. The lug length should noticeably extend beyond the endlinks and the top surface of the endlink should be sunken between the lugs, not the other way around. Also, the lughole at 1 o'clock looks cratered.

I'd classify the lugs on #2 as worse than being merely "used", even for 1972, and wouldn't pay what they're asking. Some added box and misc. paperwork doesn't replace metal of the lugs/case forever gone. For a watch in poor condition or with major flaws that can't easily be rectified, they are thrown in by a seller to act as bait.

Given the prices of both, I'd keep looking and spend the money available on the best-condition/correct watch.
CRM114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 07:43 AM   #39
The Argonaut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: VA
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 1,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by rootbeer7 View Post
Box and paperwork are easily available on the market. Don't buy 2nd rate watch which you're gong to wear over paperwork that you'll store.
First class advice.
The Argonaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 08:17 AM   #40
Julz75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Julien
Location: Paris, France
Watch: 5513 MKV
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRM114 View Post
Of the 2 choices, I'd pick #1 MK iV (1977). They both have nice patina to my eyes, and I much prefer #1's bezel.

But the main reason is the lugs on #2 turn me right off, particularly the length of the top ones, especially the 1 o'clock lug, and depth, especially at the 1 o'clock & 5 o'clock. They both look particularly horrible (not that 2 remaining are good). The lugs aren't merely rounded, but polished down to a point they're either flush or much shorter in length and/or below the level of the endlink edges. The lug length should noticeably extend beyond the endlinks and the top surface of the endlink should be sunken between the lugs, not the other way around. Also, the lughole at 1 o'clock looks cratered.

I'd classify the lugs on #2 as worse than being merely "used", even for 1972, and wouldn't pay what they're asking. Some added box and misc. paperwork doesn't replace metal of the lugs/case forever gone. For a watch in poor condition or with major flaws that can't easily be rectified, they are thrown in by a seller to act as bait.

Given the prices of both, I'd keep looking and spend the money available on the best-condition/correct watch.
Thx for the advice
Julz75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2018, 06:47 PM   #41
Julz75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Julien
Location: Paris, France
Watch: 5513 MKV
Posts: 20
Hi all,

A quick update.
I've seen this week the #2 GMT 1675 and confirm the watch was overpolished with lugs in really bad shape.
Such a pity as the patina was increadibly atractive to my eyes. That's that, but thanks again because I couln't see just with pictures what some of you had immediatly seen. It is much easier for me to notice in "real life". Must train my eyes.

Anyway I'm persuing my quest and found those two models on Exotic Watches.
Both cases are in really good shapes and patina seems very nice (but not stunning) ; yet for patina I find it difficult to project from photo to real life at it really can change depending on light and photograph skills.

Both are around 12K€, so a bit expensive but couldn't find cheaper (don't hesitate if you know great websites to buy rolex and even in the US considering the current $/€ exchange rate)
#1 is a 1972 MKII
#2 is a 1978 MKIV

Happy to get your feedback
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img (5) 1.jpg (87.9 KB, 98 views)
File Type: jpg img (4) 1.jpg (62.0 KB, 98 views)
File Type: jpg img (3) 1.jpg (59.9 KB, 101 views)
File Type: jpg img (2) 1.jpg (81.2 KB, 100 views)
File Type: jpg img (1) 1.jpg (67.1 KB, 97 views)
File Type: jpg img 1.jpg (73.7 KB, 97 views)
Julz75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2018, 04:33 AM   #42
Julz75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Julien
Location: Paris, France
Watch: 5513 MKV
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRM114 View Post
Of the 2 choices, I'd pick #1 MK iV (1977). They both have nice patina to my eyes, and I much prefer #1's bezel.

But the main reason is the lugs on #2 turn me right off, particularly the length of the top ones, especially the 1 o'clock lug, and depth, especially at the 1 o'clock & 5 o'clock. They both look particularly horrible (not that 2 remaining are good). The lugs aren't merely rounded, but polished down to a point they're either flush or much shorter in length and/or below the level of the endlink edges. The lug length should noticeably extend beyond the endlinks and the top surface of the endlink should be sunken between the lugs, not the other way around. Also, the lughole at 1 o'clock looks cratered.

I'd classify the lugs on #2 as worse than being merely "used", even for 1972, and wouldn't pay what they're asking. Some added box and misc. paperwork doesn't replace metal of the lugs/case forever gone. For a watch in poor condition or with major flaws that can't easily be rectified, they are thrown in by a seller to act as bait.

Given the prices of both, I'd keep looking and spend the money available on the best-condition/correct watch.
As some people here seem to be be very sharp on lugs ;- ), a quick question I'd like to share with you.

I've spotted a very nice GMT with great patina on an US website recommanded on this forum, and it says that the watch has never been polished.
As a matter of fact lugs look very fat and untouched with very sharp bevels, yet the top surface of the endlink is not fully sunken between the lugs. as you can see on the photos below.

=> Is it normal and can it happen if the watch has never been polished ?
Could it be a problem of endlink ?

Happy to have your view on this.
Below some photos
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2018-01-27 (1).jpg (72.2 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg 2018-01-27 (2).jpg (66.4 KB, 83 views)
File Type: jpg 2018-01-27 (3).jpg (62.4 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg 2018-01-27.jpg (65.9 KB, 81 views)
Julz75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2018, 12:08 AM   #43
mattedialdoc
"TRF" Member
 
mattedialdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julz75 View Post
As some people here seem to be be very sharp on lugs ;- ), a quick question I'd like to share with you.

I've spotted a very nice GMT with great patina on an US website recommanded on this forum, and it says that the watch has never been polished.
As a matter of fact lugs look very fat and untouched with very sharp bevels, yet the top surface of the endlink is not fully sunken between the lugs. as you can see on the photos below.

=> Is it normal and can it happen if the watch has never been polished ?
Could it be a problem of endlink ?

Happy to have your view on this.
Below some photos

Pics are from Andrew’s site. Nice watch. Standard fit for an endlink. You can easily adjust.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
mattedialdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2018, 05:53 AM   #44
Julz75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Julien
Location: Paris, France
Watch: 5513 MKV
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattedialdoc View Post
Pics are from Andrew’s site. Nice watch. Standard fit for an endlink. You can easily adjust.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thx for your feedback.
Julz75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2018, 02:37 PM   #45
Wiener48
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,299
And, any news?
Wiener48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2018, 03:56 PM   #46
twnturbo
"TRF" Member
 
twnturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SoCal
Watch: 1675 GMT/1680 MKIV
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by rootbeer7 View Post
Box and paperwork are easily available on the market. Don't buy 2nd rate watch which you're gong to wear over paperwork that you'll store.
I'd disagree on this maybe box & booklets but how you not gonna get punched papers for your watch after the fact ,like Springer said box & booklet add very little value ,but a true full set is gonna cost you.But would agree i'd rather have a mint watch no papers than a beat up one with papers.I was lucky & found a mint full set gmt when i got mine & Op check out this great site for info on all Gmt models you where asking about.GLWS

https://gmtmaster1675.com
__________________
Rolex 1680 Red Submariner MKIV Full set
Rolex 1675 Pepsi GMT Full set
Rolex 1675 GMT Radial dial Full set
TAG Heuer Carrera Chronograph Day Date
Bell & Ross BR03-92
twnturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.